Gnutella Alternative?

Posted:
in Mac Software edited January 2014
My campus networked has blocked the use of Gnutella, so my question is does anyone know of any Gnutella alternatives? Thanks.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 10
    [quote]Originally posted by Dogcow:

    <strong>My campus networked has blocked the use of Gnutella, so my question is does anyone know of any Gnutella alternatives? Thanks.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    LimeWire? or am I breing dim?
  • Reply 2 of 10
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    robster, LimeWire is a Gnutella client.



    Dogcow, have you tried OpenNap? XNap is a client for that.
  • Reply 3 of 10
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    If you can get Neo to work, you can try that.
  • Reply 4 of 10
    i think you can get around their evil anti-freedom muck, by connecting to non-standard port gnutella servents. also, set your servent to a nonstandard port (anything higher than 5500 and not equal to 6346.) if you search online you might find some active lists of gnutella servents, and possibly some on non standard ports. the way most of those firewall shits work is by blocking port numbers. gnutella was designed to weather the storm tho.



    there arent many good alternatives to gnutella on macs tho.
  • Reply 5 of 10
    One word, one activity:



    <a href="http://www.xlife.org/"; target="_blank">Acquisition </a>





    New version just came out, so I have to try it, but the previous one (.61) worked very well (up the connections to 15-20).



    It has a cocoa front end, so it runs very fast, but also makes it possible to only be run in OS X. It also lets you specify the port number you want to connect with.
  • Reply 6 of 10
    123123 Posts: 278member
    [quote]Originally posted by Gregory Paul:

    <strong>One word, one activity:



    <a href="http://www.xlife.org/"; target="_blank">Acquisition </a>





    New version just came out, so I have to try it, but the previous one (.61) worked very well (up the connections to 15-20).



    It has a cocoa front end, so it runs very fast, but also makes it possible to only be run in OS X. It also lets you specify the port number you want to connect with.</strong><hr></blockquote>





    Acquisitoin is also just a gnutella client.
  • Reply 7 of 10
    spartspart Posts: 2,060member
    But it is a very good gnutella client.
  • Reply 8 of 10
    [quote]Originally posted by Spart:

    <strong>But it is a very good gnutella client.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    It maybe be good, but it still doesn't work. Xnap will connect but not download files <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />
  • Reply 9 of 10
    baumanbauman Posts: 1,248member
    The only p2p client that I have found to work behind my school's network after playing with godzillions of port settings, etc, is . . . .



    <a href="http://www.mysternetworks.com/"; target="_blank">Myster</a>



    It has a pretty crappy interface, and not many files on the network, but at least I can download something. As far as I can tell, it is one of the few programs that doesn't require you to share files, and it uses an irregular port (6669, I believe).



    Just to let you know, I've tried each of these programs with no success: Acquisition, Carracho, Hotline, Direct Connect, iSwippe, KDX, Limewire, Neo, and xNap. Granted, my school's firewall may be different from yours, but that gives you an idea of what doesn't work.
  • Reply 10 of 10
    marcukmarcuk Posts: 4,442member
    Im needing a list of MAC OS 9 client software I can use, if anyone can supply a list.
Sign In or Register to comment.