Quicktime VR software for OS10

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Mac Software edited January 2014
I realize that Apple started this whole line of photographic tech, but do they or anyone else offer a program which creates panoramic, stitched images in OS10?



I would especially like to find something like PhotoSuite (windowsick) which allows you to build photo montages of items captured with a 360-degree unit (three rotating axis instead of just two) I want the printable images more than the movable ones in this case. (But creating the movable ones in OS10 would be nice as well)

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 11
    buonrottobuonrotto Posts: 6,368member
    Is any of the stuff <a href="http://www.kaidan.com/products/util-and-soft.html"; target="_blank">here</a> helpful or just old news?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 11
    escherescher Posts: 1,811member
    nosey: VRToolBox's <a href="http://www.vrtoolbox.com/vrthome.html"; target="_blank">VR Worx 2.1</a> is Carbonized/OS X native.



    Adobe's Photoshop Elements also includes a panorama stitching function. At $100 ($50 educational), it's probably the most affordable panorama-making tool.



    Escher
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 11
    noseynosey Posts: 307member
    Thanks guys...



    Most of the stuff mentioned on the Kaidan site (Thanks BuonRotto) hasn't been upgraded for OS10.



    But that there VRWorx2.1... Now that is something to try. And I shall check on Photoshop Elements. I wonder if whatever Elements has is available in Photoshop 7?



    Hmmm...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 11
    escherescher Posts: 1,811member
    [quote]Originally posted by nosey:

    <strong>But that there VRWorx2.1... Now that is something to try. And I shall check on Photoshop Elements. I wonder if whatever Elements has is available in Photoshop 7?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Hey nosey. VRWorx is definitely a great solution. I talked to the guys at MWNY last year. They've always shown great commitment to the Mac.



    As for the panorama function in Elements, Photoshop doesn't have it, AFAIK. I remember reading a review of Elements wondering out loud why the $100 consumer package included such great functionality while the $500 pro-level Photoshop didn't. I guess the real VR pros simply use VRWorx.



    I guess your choice will depend on whether you plan on using QTVR for personal fun or to make a living.



    Escher
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 11
    buonrottobuonrotto Posts: 6,368member
    Oddly, enough, PS doesn't have the "photomerge" feature that Elements does. The feature can be a bit flaky -- it's unable to stitch together any photos I took with a wide angle lense (less than 35 mm), and even then it sometimes has trouble (though you can do it manually obviously). It only works horizontally too.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 11
    leonisleonis Posts: 3,427member
    Also think about Stitcher from <a href="http://www.realviz.com"; target="_blank">www.realviz.com</a>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 11
    noseynosey Posts: 307member
    Thanks guys. The Stitcher, ez and otherwise, from Photoviz looks about right, but they didn't mention anything about horizontal and vertical stitching.



    In case you are wondering why this is important, I saw a magazine once which had a slew of photos from a location, all the edges haphazardly lying around, but the photo fitted perfectly to gether (well, almost. I think there was a bit of problems the closer the photos were to the ground and the camera)



    I would like to be able to offer this effect to clients, especially for convention spaces and the outside of presentation folders. You see, I have found more of a market for the printed panoramic than for the Quicktime movie. Where I work there are some big oil refineries (with BIG marketing budgets)



    I know there was a plugin for Photoshop which made adjustments for the barrel effect from a lens while allowing you to put the pictures in place. Almost seamless, and the blending was at you r discretion, but that filter would be useful to try. Cheaper than buying yet another program, too since I have to get a decent rig for holding the camera at the nodal point.



    But hey, thanks for the replies. I am downloading the Stitcher trial to see how it works.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 11
    escherescher Posts: 1,811member
    [quote]Originally posted by nosey:

    <strong>Cheaper than buying yet another program, too since I have to get a decent rig for holding the camera at the nodal point.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    You've obviously done your research. IMO, a good pano head will do more for a good panorama than high-end pano software. It's a shame good pano heads are so expensive.



    Escher
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 11
    noseynosey Posts: 307member
    Yup... you are right. If you can get one which has presets for your camera, even better!



    A friend has this Manfrotto

    <a href="http://www.manfrotto.com/products/index.html?doc_from=home"; target="_blank">http://www.manfrotto.com/products/index.html?doc_from=home</a>;



    and I have a Kiwi plus, which I bought because I was going to get a big fancy Nikon D1 (yeah, right...) <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> It was meant to last through two or three camera purchases, so it couldn't just handle one camera.



    When I was first playing, um... working with all this stuff the two-turny (?) ones were almost $2500. The Manfrotto my friend has was over $800 and the piddly little Kiwi I have was $450. Prices in Canadian dollars... move the decimal to the left to get American dollars... <img src="graemlins/embarrassed.gif" border="0" alt="[Embarrassed]" />



    I would love to build my own so I could vary the horizontal pitch of the camera, while adjusting the front plane... All while keeping the nodal point perfect...



    But then it would probably look like a cludged together bicycle tire balancing precariously on a tripod... Not the best thing for a client to see you using...



    [ 12-12-2002: Message edited by: nosey ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 11
    escherescher Posts: 1,811member
    [quote]Originally posted by nosey:

    <strong>I would love to build my own so I could vary the horizontal pitch of the camera, while adjusting the front plane... All while keeping the nodal point perfect...</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Do you mean like the <a href="http://www.kaidan.com/Detail.bok?no=43"; target="_blank">QuickPan Spherical</a>, so that you could to "cubic" QTVR panoramas? I went to an Apple-sponsored QTVR seminar last year at Apple's Offices in Northern Virginia. The pro photographer who taught the seminar had on of those, along with a neoprene-coated handle to make switching from click-stop to click-stop even easier. I'd love to be able to afford one of those. Of course it would be total overkill for my current entry-level PowerShot A20.



    Escher
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 11
    escherescher Posts: 1,811member
    I just noticed the release of a <a href="http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/17489"; target="_blank">Panotools Photoshop plugin</a> based on Helmut Dersch's Panotools. I have tried Panotools in the past. I found it to be very powerful, but impossible to use due to the lack of a simple and intuitive user interface. I bet this Photoshop plugin addresses a good number of those useability concerns. If you have Photoshop 7 (I don't), it's got to be worth a try.



    Escher
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.