iDVD Update - Oh No!, Wrong Info From MacSurfer

Posted:
in Mac Software edited January 2014
According to Insanely Great Mac iDVD 2.1 is posted for free. So there!



[ 01-05-2003: Message edited by: MacsRGood4U ]



[ 01-05-2003: Message edited by: MacsRGood4U ]</p>

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 4
    dwsdws Posts: 108member
    [quote]Originally posted by MacsRGood4U:

    <strong>According to Insanely Great Mac iDVD 2.1 is posted for free. So there!



    [ 01-05-2003: Message edited by: MacsRGood4U ]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    IGM did publish an article earlier today, filled with inaccurate information. The article has since been pulled.



    While you get points for seeing an article for the brief time it was on the web, those points get taken away because you didn't know that iDVD 2.1 was released on July 17th, 2002!



    So there!
  • Reply 2 of 4
    macsrgood4umacsrgood4u Posts: 3,007member
    oops! MacSurfer had it on their page. Since I don't use it i didn't know. I'll go to my room now. :o



    P.S. IGM has not addmitted their mistake, they just removed the article with no explanation. No responsibility and maturity on their part I'm afraid.



    [ 01-05-2003: Message edited by: MacsRGood4U ]</p>
  • Reply 3 of 4
    dwsdws Posts: 108member
    According to IGM...



    "The article was up for about an hour on a Sunday morning, and I pulled it after I realized it was wrong. My software update for some reason picked up iDVD 2.1 after having iDVD installed since the day it came out.



    If I would have left the article up with a correction, people would be complaining we're doing this on purpose to get banner hits. I realized there's no winning with you people years ago, so I just pulled it and moved on."



    "There's no winning with you people"... Ouch!



    Insanely Great Mac isn't looking so insanely great right now. <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />



    Oh well, he's right that we should all just move on (though we might make deleting a certain bookmark part of that process!).
  • Reply 4 of 4
    macsrgood4umacsrgood4u Posts: 3,007member
    As I said, "immature". If they don't have tough skins they shouldn't be in journalism (if you can call what they do that.) Blame others. Geez.
Sign In or Register to comment.