10.3....what does it need for you to pay for it??

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Mac Software edited January 2014
i am hoping for bochs to be up and running on os x 10.3, an apple version of VPC in every mac.....one more dig at that 800 pound gorilla, steve ballmer...i mean, microsoft



iChat 2 with video and audio





what else could we use in panther??



g

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 17
    davegeedavegee Posts: 2,765member
    Funny... Each day I spend with OS X I'm finding less and less a need to have VPC or someother x86 emulation on my machines.



    This is a GOOD thing!



    Dave
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 17
    true...and 10.2 is very nice...so i see little reason to pay for 10.3...so i am looking to see how can apple make 10.3 so good that i want to buy it....



    i probably would like a simple VPC type program built in...i would rarely use it, but it would be great for switchers and just nice to have as i am sure apple would do a great job with it (at least by version 2...we know version 1 will be slow and buggy..ha)



    what would make me buy 10.3 for my iMac FP 800 if it is mostly for improvements to run the new PM 970 chips running at 64??



    so, to make us old machine humans up-grade, what do i need, but don't know i need untill apple unveils it??



    g



    [ 02-28-2003: Message edited by: thegelding ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 17
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    Bochs? Bah.



    More speed (not that 10.2 isn't fast enough, but I'm spoiled by the rate of progress of previous releases ), a generous application of overall spit and polish, Carbon and Cocoa fully integrated, AppleScript 2, and metadata. Oh, and a less flaky Developer Tools than the current one, although that's admittedly not likely to be specific to 10.3.



    I'd be happy then. Heh.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 17
    yeah, but amorph, i don't program, i play....



    what can apple put in 10.3 that makes me (and my slow-witted kind) go, ohhhh, i gotta get that??



    yes speed is always nice, but i want to see something i didn't even think about, but then suddenly makes me go, "dang, i can't live without that"....sort of like viagra.... :eek:





    g
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 17
    lucaluca Posts: 3,833member
    1. Much faster (as fast as OS 9 while both single tasking and multitasking)



    2. More Mac-like, less UNIX-like. I'd love the option to run it just like the classic OS - single user, put your documents wherever you want, categorize your applications within your applications folder, etc. Apple has smart programmers, they'll figure out how to do this if they want to.



    3. Some GUI tools for various CLI things... every now and then, you have to tell a newbie to go into terminal and type something, and it's a scary, new thing. It would be nice if Apple added a "Terminal GUI" into their Utilities folder, letting you do basic stuff like fsck and rm without having to type it all into the terminal.



    4. Better, faster, stronger help system. Mainly faster. Like, 10x or 20x faster.



    5. Option to turn the dock off. Sure, you can put it on the side of the screen with just two icons and at minimum size with hiding on, but it'll still come back to bug you. Some people just don't like it, let them turn it off and use a third party add-on.



    6. Building from #5, they should be more accepting of third parties who want to make enhancements to OS X. It can only help them. If Apple makes it easy to develop little enhancers and utilities for OS X, they will generate a lot more interest among small-time programmers who want to do something. As it is now, it's a bit of a daunting task to do anything to modify OS X because Apple purposely makes it really hard. I'd like built in icon customization, themes, custom alert sounds, etc. They make it easy to do screen savers, why not do it with other aspects?



    7. Rendezvous actually IMPLEMENTED in areas that you'll notice. They made such a big deal about Rendezvous last MWNY, and I still haven't even seen it outside iChat. What ever happened to Rendezvous-enabled iTunes? Did it just disappear or something? That was freaking seven months ago!



    8. Read and write access to FTP servers through Finder. I have RBrowser Lite for FTP (it's free and easy to use) but if it was integrated with the finder it would be even easier.



    9. I would kinda like it if the terminal would autocomplete the names of files, folders, applications, etc, when you press tab. That's how the lab computers for my Java lab work... I don't know what version of Unix they run, but I do like that tab thing, a big time saver.



    10. In the same vein as the "One-click enhance" from iPhoto, I'd like a "Custom dynamic equalizer" for iTunes. One which listens to the music and automatically equalizes as the song progresses, enhancing the music while minimizing the Sounds of Static.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 17
    For Apple to charge for it. Simple.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 17
    kickahakickaha Posts: 8,760member
    [quote]Originally posted by Luca Rescigno:

    <strong>1. Much faster (as fast as OS 9 while both single tasking and multitasking)</strong><hr></blockquote>



    MacOS X never single tasks.



    [quote]<strong>

    2. More Mac-like, less UNIX-like. I'd love the option to run it just like the classic OS - single user, put your documents wherever you want, categorize your applications within your applications folder, etc. Apple has smart programmers, they'll figure out how to do this if they want to.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Apple has smart users, they'll figure out how to use the system if they want to...



    Sorry, I *have* my apps categorized, and except for my 'hard drive' from 9 being at ~&lt;username&gt; instead of the top level (which is completely irrelevant with that nice Home button on the Finder windows, and the ability to have new windows open up there by default), it's basically the same.



    ie, don't hold your breath.



    [quote]<strong>

    3. Some GUI tools for various CLI things... every now and then, you have to tell a newbie to go into terminal and type something, and it's a scary, new thing. It would be nice if Apple added a "Terminal GUI" into their Utilities folder, letting you do basic stuff like fsck and rm without having to type it all into the terminal.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    fsck: Disk Utility (it just runs fsck, after all)

    rm: Finder



    Oh, you meant for removing files the average user shouldn't. I don't see having a mild barrier being a problem. Heck, if it bothers you that much, whip up an AppleScript Studio applet that uses sudo rm -rf on anything dropped in it's panel.



    [quote]<strong>

    5. Option to turn the dock off. Sure, you can put it on the side of the screen with just two icons and at minimum size with hiding on, but it'll still come back to bug you. Some people just don't like it, let them turn it off and use a third party add-on.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    It would be nice to see them support further enhancements like they let you select which mailer, which browser, etc. Have core AppleScript functionality that "If your app conforms to these messages, you can replace app &lt;foo&gt;".



    [quote]<strong>

    9. I would kinda like it if the terminal would autocomplete the names of files, folders, applications, etc, when you press tab. That's how the lab computers for my Java lab work... I don't know what version of Unix they run, but I do like that tab thing, a big time saver.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Er, use tcsh as your shell. Voila.



    ctrl-D to see possible selections, tab to complete.



    [ 02-28-2003: Message edited by: Kickaha ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 17
    chychchych Posts: 860member
    [quote]<strong>



    5. Option to turn the dock off. Sure, you can put it on the side of the screen with just two icons and at minimum size with hiding on, but it'll still come back to bug you. Some people just don't like it, let them turn it off and use a third party add-on.

    <hr></blockquote></strong>

    You can write an apple script to kill the dock, or kill the dock in terminal... remove dock.app from coreservices and see what happens.



    [quote]<strong>

    7. Rendezvous actually IMPLEMENTED in areas that you'll notice. They made such a big deal about Rendezvous last MWNY, and I still haven't even seen it outside iChat. What ever happened to Rendezvous-enabled iTunes? Did it just disappear or something? That was freaking seven months ago!

    <hr></blockquote></strong>

    Well it's in Safari now as well. Though what ever happend to iTunes... I want that...

    [quote]<strong>

    8. Read and write access to FTP servers through Finder. I have RBrowser Lite for FTP (it's free and easy to use) but if it was integrated with the finder it would be even easier.

    <hr></blockquote></strong>

    This exists already, and I think it actually works in 10.2.4... just go to go -&gt; connect to server and type in the ftp addy





    I'd also like some themeing ability and some use for the Network thing which is at the directory your hard drive is. And C'mon, WINDOW RESIZING! Sooo slow...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 17
    buonrottobuonrotto Posts: 6,368member
    For a true single user OS 9-style of hard drive layout, I think this could be done in the Finder by appearances only witout having to re-engineer all of unix. In other words, they could make it look like your Desktop, Documents, Pictures, etc. folders are at the top level of the hard drive when under the hood they're still under users:home:xyz folder. I'm sure some purists would throw fits but, really, does it matter?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 17
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,464member
    I'm beginning to think that OSX 10.3 won't be a $129 OS upgrade but rather maybe a $69 upgrade with some new features and functionality but nothing groundbreaking.



    It seems like Apple is really going to have to do something nice to get people to fork out the money.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 17
    Bug fixes across the line. There are still many small irritating things that Apple should have fixed eons ago.



    A new 'Connect too..' dialog!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 17
    • bundle it with Mac-Link plus or comperable translation software again.

    • Release AppleWorks 7, with good support for Word file formats.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 17
    stunnedstunned Posts: 1,096member
    Keynote.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 17
    Extend Unicode support for additional languages. They added Arabic and Hebrew with 10.2. Let's add Hindi and some others. That could help the international market, as small as it is for Apple.



    [ 03-01-2003: Message edited by: gobble gobble ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 17
    ibrowseibrowse Posts: 1,749member
    The option to switch users instead of logging out, so I don't have to quit all my apps to switch accounts, like *sigh* WinXP.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 17
    ebbyebby Posts: 3,110member
    I would need great TWAIN support, SCSI support, and (wishing but not going to happen) old PCI video card support. (3dfx Voodoo 5) <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 17
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    I'll probably get it no matter what.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.