Apple's arrogance
Apple should wake up and give users what they want instead of what Apple thinks is best for users. AI members feel that way about the xMac.
What arrogance! This article points that out:
Apple began working with the U.S. retail chain Best Buy in the spring of 2006 on a pilot project to obtain shelf space for Macs. Given Apple's long, tempestuous history with many retail chains, restoring trust has been tough. In 1999, Best Buy dropped the Mac when Apple continued to ship models and colors that pleased itself, and not those ordered by Best Buy.
The article that contained the above segment is 'Did Apple muff Mac's big chance?
'http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/09/16/news/digi17.php
What arrogance! This article points that out:
Apple began working with the U.S. retail chain Best Buy in the spring of 2006 on a pilot project to obtain shelf space for Macs. Given Apple's long, tempestuous history with many retail chains, restoring trust has been tough. In 1999, Best Buy dropped the Mac when Apple continued to ship models and colors that pleased itself, and not those ordered by Best Buy.
The article that contained the above segment is 'Did Apple muff Mac's big chance?
'http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/09/16/news/digi17.php
Comments
It's never good when you only want to please yourself and not your partner...
Save the "xMac" crap for future hardware. Other than a circle jerk group of about ten guys here, it doesn't seem that anyone is terribly interested.
Save the "xMac" crap for future hardware. Other than a circle jerk group of about ten guys here, it doesn't seem that anyone is terribly interested.
Of course it doesn't seem that more than a 'circle jerk' group of about two guys are actively disinterested in it.
Apple should wake up and give users what they want instead of what Apple thinks is best for users.
Yes they should and thanks for posting the article because it is starting to paint a picture of what is really wrong with Apple. I constantly think to myself when they come out with the coolest software, gadgets, operating system and hardware designs (minus the iMac) they are still so unpopular in the computer industry.
When Steve was on stage with Bill Gates, he mentioned how one of Apple's failures was not partnering well unlike Microsoft. Their arrogance was likely their downfall in those ventures too.
It must be tough I guess if you are the 'little' guy because you don't want to fold in every negotiation otherwise you become a weak target but obvious customer demand is different and not something to mess with or you're just asking for trouble.
you know what, i like apples arogance, sure they may make you mad at times, but its what gives us great products, they will eventually prob have somthin like an xmac, apple is not affraid to tell people whats what, a lot of times what they do seems stupid at first, its either not, or they fix it and appoligize for it, they dont lie and whoos out about it and leave it the same. if apple felt the need right now for the xmac, it would be out, who knows, they may be designing it right now... now. ...now
Well put. It's one thing to be arrogant and make poor products. It's an interesting argument that Apple's arrogance is what leads to their greatness, and it's one that actually makes sense. You are your own biggest critic.
Anyway, I guarantee Apple has a reason for not producing the "xMac." I guarantee they hit the case studies and have made predictions, roadmaps, and analyses. That's without question. If it beats you up so much, there's still not really anything the rest of us can do about it.
Selfish Apple.
It's never good when you only want to please yourself and not your partner...
I'm surprised that a totally subjective comment with no further support in a commentary that definitely has the Apples pooch is screwed tenor means much. The only thing Apple has shipped in colors since Best Buy began partnering is the Nano and Shuffle. Black MacBooks hardly even count there. Pretty small potatoes to compare against especially since the article was about Macs, not iPods. So what was the authors point again?