March 7, 2003 10:02AM
edited January 2014
when will apple update the icon to wide screen cinema aspect ratio?
Reply 1 of 4
March 7, 2003 10:50AM
I say the icon is fine now for two reasons:
1. The default terminal window size is still 80 columns by 24 rows. This still gives a size of the approzimate 4*3 ratio. There is no reason to change this size.
2. Icons are still 128*128 in size. The closer to the shape of a square the icon is, the more area you maximize from the total available area. Would the icon really look any better if it was short and squatty? I don't think so. Note that a lot of Apple's "utility" icons are very close to the square shape.
Reply 2 of 4
March 8, 2003 1:49AM
ONLY on a mac would people talk about an ICON :eek: :eek: LMAO <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
Reply 3 of 4
March 8, 2003 3:57AM
[quote]Originally posted by frank_t:
<strong>ONLY on a mac would people talk about an ICON</strong><hr></blockquote>
And it shows that Microsoft doesn't care about icons on Windows.
Reply 4 of 4
t'hain esh kelch
March 8, 2003 7:04AM
*In on geek thread*
Seriously, due to Apple having switched, and still doing, it seems logically to update all icons to widescreens..
Oh.. My mac has spoiled my!