terminal icon

in Mac Software edited January 2014
when will apple update the icon to wide screen cinema aspect ratio?


  • Reply 1 of 4
    I say the icon is fine now for two reasons:

    1. The default terminal window size is still 80 columns by 24 rows. This still gives a size of the approzimate 4*3 ratio. There is no reason to change this size.

    2. Icons are still 128*128 in size. The closer to the shape of a square the icon is, the more area you maximize from the total available area. Would the icon really look any better if it was short and squatty? I don't think so. Note that a lot of Apple's "utility" icons are very close to the square shape.
  • Reply 2 of 4
    frank_tfrank_t Posts: 428member
    ONLY on a mac would people talk about an ICON :eek: :eek: LMAO <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> :eek:

  • Reply 3 of 4
    jlljll Posts: 2,713member
    [quote]Originally posted by frank_t:

    <strong>ONLY on a mac would people talk about an ICON</strong><hr></blockquote>

    And it shows that Microsoft doesn't care about icons on Windows.
  • Reply 4 of 4
    *In on geek thread*

    Seriously, due to Apple having switched, and still doing, it seems logically to update all icons to widescreens..

    Oh.. My mac has spoiled my!
Sign In or Register to comment.