Whats Wrong in OS X
I just upgradded to OS X on my original Tangerine iBook 300 (4MB, 96MB, 3GB) and it looks really pretty there. Nothing runs at a speed I can handle put it certainly is pretty. I took it off.
Then I put it on my G3/400 (B/W 512MB, 27GB) and again, it is really pretty. It skips a little here and there, but Classic is a little sluggish. These speed isues are not a problem - my equipment is old.
Within OS 9.2.2 I am able to fly around the interface finding what I need and be productive. In X I am usually hunting and pecking around. I am new, its expected, right? Well, I am a 5 year verteran of the Mac OS... Should I need more than a week to get a new OS down?
Perhaps, but what I am really driving at is Apple has not shown me that they have taken function into consideration along with that pretty UI and hardware.
I woudl like to see something functional like the Apple Menu from 9: Y'know, click on it and Bam! There is everything you want! Apps, Files, Drives - and you can custom build it.
What is this nonsense where you click on a menu in the middle of the menu bar to get a submenu for Applications!?
The thought seems to have been put into their gigaflops. Excellent idea, but if that is the only place you put thought... Giga-Flop!
Then I put it on my G3/400 (B/W 512MB, 27GB) and again, it is really pretty. It skips a little here and there, but Classic is a little sluggish. These speed isues are not a problem - my equipment is old.
Within OS 9.2.2 I am able to fly around the interface finding what I need and be productive. In X I am usually hunting and pecking around. I am new, its expected, right? Well, I am a 5 year verteran of the Mac OS... Should I need more than a week to get a new OS down?
Perhaps, but what I am really driving at is Apple has not shown me that they have taken function into consideration along with that pretty UI and hardware.
I woudl like to see something functional like the Apple Menu from 9: Y'know, click on it and Bam! There is everything you want! Apps, Files, Drives - and you can custom build it.
What is this nonsense where you click on a menu in the middle of the menu bar to get a submenu for Applications!?
The thought seems to have been put into their gigaflops. Excellent idea, but if that is the only place you put thought... Giga-Flop!
Comments
<strong><a href="http://forums.appleinsider.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=000178" target="_blank">http://forums.appleinsider.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb. cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=000178</a></strong><hr></blockquote>
It is too bad that it has come to outsiders doing Apple's job...
<strong>
It is too bad that it has come to outsiders doing Apple's job... </strong><hr></blockquote>
It's not Apple's job to make Mac OS 9 again - the Dock can do what you want.
Or make a folder with only aliases of apps you want and drag it to the dock.
Much easier, especially for newbies, than looking for a special folder in the "sacred" system folder.
Just drag anything you want to the dock. Or for that matter you can drag any folder to the toolbar (the place where the applications folder resides).
Also, you know that you can rearrange the toolbar however you like right?
It just takes a little getting used to is all.
The Apple Menu was a shaky pile of hacks by the time MacOS reached version 9. Good riddance.
I'm still waiting for a replacement for labels, though. Preferably a more robust implementation than classic MacOS'.
SdC
That sucker came to a grinding halt six times in the last hour. Force restart Finder all day while performing easy tasks, the cpu gets hardly more than 40 per cent.
As Amorph said it's a pile of hacked waist.
I know he was talking about the Apple menu, I know.
For me the Finder is the most unproductive bottleneck so far. I do not mention the bugs here and there in the GUI in the filesystem, etc. it is a version 0.1.2 , but the Finder really must be 0.0.1 . <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />