Dreamweaver CS3 vs. Freeway 5.0
I'm finally looking to move from GoLive to something more modern and ready for the future.
I got RapidWeaver as part of MacHeist, but I find it a bit too restrictive. I'm a WYSIWYG kind of guy.
Adobe, in their infinite wisdom, does not allow for an upgrade from their old web development program to their new one. This means I'll have to pay the full $399. for Dreamweaver if I decide to go that route.
I'm intrigued with the news about Softpress' new version of Freeway, which is out this month. Anybody here have experience with this product?
I'm less than enamoured with SoftPress' own site, which is text-heavy and lacks screenshots and clean design. Not a great advertisement for the software itself.
However, the Pro version is half the price of Dreamweaver and seems to have a lot of the core functionality.
Being an InDesign user, their appeal to designers who want to engage in web design is compelling.
Can anybody here vouch for this approach? Is there any good reason to pay double the cost for Dreamweaver?
I got RapidWeaver as part of MacHeist, but I find it a bit too restrictive. I'm a WYSIWYG kind of guy.
Adobe, in their infinite wisdom, does not allow for an upgrade from their old web development program to their new one. This means I'll have to pay the full $399. for Dreamweaver if I decide to go that route.
I'm intrigued with the news about Softpress' new version of Freeway, which is out this month. Anybody here have experience with this product?
I'm less than enamoured with SoftPress' own site, which is text-heavy and lacks screenshots and clean design. Not a great advertisement for the software itself.
However, the Pro version is half the price of Dreamweaver and seems to have a lot of the core functionality.
Being an InDesign user, their appeal to designers who want to engage in web design is compelling.
Can anybody here vouch for this approach? Is there any good reason to pay double the cost for Dreamweaver?
Comments
I hate the conforming-to-the-pack mentality, but I hate wasting money too.
Yikes. If nobody wants to admit using Freeway, I may end up going with DW just to ensure compatibility with the majority.
I hate the conforming-to-the-pack mentality, but I hate wasting money too.
i don't know if this will help or not, but i started out by cutting my teeth on web design/development with golive (or cyberstudio as it was known before adobe purchased it). i then used dreamweaver almost exclusively after i changed jobs and that was what they used. for the most part i got to the point that i liked it more than golive. just seamed like it was more flexible and allowed me to develop my skills beyond the wysiwyg interface. it got to the point that i began spending more time in the code view of the app. now i've recently made the move from dw to coda and couldn't be happier?due in part to it's lighter weight and more responsive interface. just seems to fit where i'm at in my evolution as a design/developer.
that said, i never got into this biz thinking i wanted to learn markup or code, but the longer i did i would pick up tidbits out of necessity. next thing you know, i fairly comfortable poking around in code, if not writing it from scratch. so my one piece of advise would be to pick a product that will allow you to evolve your skills. relying too heavily on the app to do things for you will at some point come back to bite you in the ass.
Code auto-complete is almost a necessity when you are trying to make sure all your div tags are closed properly. I would love an editor that color coded div tags automatically so you could see where they start and end.
I wish they'd use vertical tabs though. I tend to have a lot of file open at once and they keep wrapping off the end. I don't like this in Safari either.
How does RAGE WebDesign compare with Dreamweaver and Golive or other WYSIWYG HTML Editors?