Don't like the pricing on Jagwire? Do something about it!
Tell Apple how you feel! It's not reasonable for current OS X users to pay full price for an upgrade that finally makes the system usable. If Apple can't figure that out for themselves, then we have to tell them...
Remember, enough angry customers can make a difference (think Adobe InDesign 1.0-1.5).
<a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/feedback/" target="_blank">http://www.apple.com/macosx/feedback/</a>
[ 07-19-2002: Message edited by: Whyatt Thrash ]</p>
Remember, enough angry customers can make a difference (think Adobe InDesign 1.0-1.5).
<a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/feedback/" target="_blank">http://www.apple.com/macosx/feedback/</a>
[ 07-19-2002: Message edited by: Whyatt Thrash ]</p>
Comments
10.1.5 isn't usable? Please.
[ 07-19-2002: Message edited by: Jon Rubinstein ]</p>
I think thats what he means by saying "usable"...
<strong>I have found that most tasks in X do alright comparatively to OS9. But I still have to boot in 9 to play Warcraft III because it plays soooo much faster, even on a brand new high end iMac G4.
I think thats what he means by saying "usable"...</strong><hr></blockquote>
Then he doesn't understand the meaning of the word usable, may I suggest 'optimal'.
<strong>
Then he doesn't understand the meaning of the word usable, may I suggest 'optimal'.</strong><hr></blockquote>
When the game skips and slows down considerably I would call that realistically unusable. Yes, it can be used, but not very well at all. OS9 isnt even "optimal", most games including WC3, play faster under windows(compared with same speed processors)
Tell Apple how you feel! It's not reasonable for current OS X users to pay full price for an upgrade that finally makes the system usable. If Apple can't figure that out for themselves, then we have to tell them.. <hr></blockquote>
Darn. I thought from the subject you had a good link to a juarez site where I could pick up WinXP.
[ 07-22-2002: Message edited by: shillforsteve ]</p>
Then he doesn't understand the meaning of the word usable, may I suggest 'optimal'.<hr></blockquote>
Actually since "usable" was the original word used I'd hesitate to put another word, "optimal," which has a different meaning, into someone else's mouth.
System 1.0/Finder 1.0 (they had different version numbers in those days) worked rather well with MacWrite 1.0 and MacPaint 1.0. Of course there's always System 6.08 (they simplified the nomenclature) which many considered both more usable and optimal when compared to System 7.01 which was a real dog.
I believe the second post, however, points out that 10.1 and updates thereafter which have been eminently "usable" for most of us, can continue to be if we so choose, and I would hope that if we elect to purchase 10.2 (I have) it won't be the final story on OSX.
I hope that is both usable and optimal on the day it ships but I also hope that Apple is working on 10.2.1.
<strong>Play better under windows with the same speed processor or relative processor speed. I find it hard to believe a pc with sdram and a 100MHz bus and an 800MHz processor would play warcraft any better then the mac is os 9. I have a dual 533 and i find no problem with warcraft what so ever. How much ram do you have in your imac</strong><hr></blockquote>
Don't forget the iMac's CPU has to decode and produce sound while on a PC that is offloaded to the soundcard. This is an important factor when comparing framerates and such.
So, yes, I would expect a PC with the same specs as an iMac will play the game faster / better than the iMac.
<strong>Don't like thr pirce, at least you can get it cheaper than $129 from Amazon.com thorugh a $50 mail in rebate. $79 is not too bad.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Read the coupon. Only U.S residents are legible for the rebate. As if that's not all, the pricing on Jaguar where I live ain't 129$, but closer to 150$.
Sure, it might be worth it for a significant speed-increase of the system (that's why I'd be buying it), but should I be buying Steve Jobs a DVD-player for removing debug code?
The Solution? simple...git yo friends together and all chip in for ONE steekin copy and burn that mofo till the burna cahn't burn no mo!!!
uh huh uh huh! call it piracy...call it whatchu want...us po folk up here call it 'stickin it to tha man!!"
(pass me some weed yo...)
If you ever made an application to sell I think your veiws on piracy would be radically different. Pirateing is STEALING and it hurts the developers and the consumer base when developers stop producing as much software for the Mac OS because sales suck. If it's not worth it for you don't buy it!