The 970 and OS X
When Apple later this year and next switches over to the 64-bit Power PC 970 platform I presume they will rewrite OS X for the 64-bit architecture. So my question is, what will happen with the old 32-bit OS X? Will they stop development of it? Then will everyone who has a 32-bit machine be permanently stuck with 10.(whatever)?
Comments
<strong>When Apple later this year and next switches over to the 64-bit Power PC 970 platform I presume they will rewrite OS X for the 64-bit architecture. So my question is, what will happen with the old 32-bit OS X? Will they stop development of it? Then will everyone who has a 32-bit machine be permanently stuck with 10.(whatever)?</strong><hr></blockquote>
I may be wrong, but I think that OS X is portable enough that they'd pretty much just have to change a flag or two and recompile it to get a 64 bit version. I would expect them to continue updating the 32 bit version as long as it remains that easy to change.
[ 02-25-2003: Message edited by: RodUK ]</p>
Since IBM guarantees full compatibility with old 32-bit code, I don't think many users will ever see the difference. Indeed, I don't have to ask my wife about 32/64 bits to know what she thinks.
A 64-bit version vs 32-bit version isn't any different than a G3 optimized version vs a G4 optimized version. It's a simple compiler switch to convert the resultant binary. And, as has been pointed out, any 32-bit code will continue to run unaltered, without a penalty.
So the same OS will continue to be developed for both 32- and 64-bit machines, and only the end binary will be different. You're not going to be left behind on 32-bit hardware.