One of the most absurd things Apple has ever done...
I received a 12" PB for a client last night. I open it up and begin setting it up for him. I decide to go in ASP to see what brand HD he has and low and behold:
The new 12" Powerbooks ship with 256MB of RAM...which are TWO 128 CHIPS, ONE BEING SOLDERED ON THE MB <img src="graemlins/surprised.gif" border="0" alt="[surprised]" />
I realize that one would have been soldered but I find this to be the most petty cheap ass thing Apple has ever done, why didn't they just solder 256 on the MB? I mean for anyone to upgrade the ram they are stuck with a 128 chip...christ, just ship it with 128 and make it cheaper.
Sorry...I just found that to be the most ridiculous thing I have seen Apple do in a long while.
<img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[oyvey]" />
The new 12" Powerbooks ship with 256MB of RAM...which are TWO 128 CHIPS, ONE BEING SOLDERED ON THE MB <img src="graemlins/surprised.gif" border="0" alt="[surprised]" />
I realize that one would have been soldered but I find this to be the most petty cheap ass thing Apple has ever done, why didn't they just solder 256 on the MB? I mean for anyone to upgrade the ram they are stuck with a 128 chip...christ, just ship it with 128 and make it cheaper.
Sorry...I just found that to be the most ridiculous thing I have seen Apple do in a long while.
<img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[oyvey]" />
Comments
I hope when the 1GB DDR SoDIMM modules come out, they will be supported.
I guess you could sell it to a new 1GHz iMac owner who has an empty slot that will hold it... to bump their memory to a mind-blowing 384 MB.
Or hey, you could BTO a 512 in there from Apple... I wonder if they thought of that...
Exactly how much in $$$s are they actually saving doing this given that RAM is pretty cheap at the moment?
<strong>But this is DDR ram...</strong><hr></blockquote>
Well.... ****!
640 - 512 = 128
Yep. 128 is soldered to the board. Did this really need a thread?
Apple infomercial is the most absurd thing Apple has ever done.
If you want to up the RAM, you're stuck with an expensive drink stirrer.
yeah you seem to be missing the point. like murbot said.. why even include the second 128, or at least offer the option of not having it in there since it's just going to get thrown away anyway!
it's that or they are just ****ing stupid <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
<strong>The anger is more over the fact that they stick you with a useless 128 MB chip, not the soldered-on 128.
If you want to up the RAM, you're stuck with an expensive drink stirrer.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I see now, I still vote for Apple infomercial.
<strong>Probably because they're overstocked. I guess Apple bought tons of 128MB sticks a couple of year ago when they thought it would be standard for some years. It seems they were wrong
it's that or they are just ****ing stupid <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
They bought tons of 128MB DDR RAM years ago? Impressive, since no mac laptops used DDR until the new Aluminum models.
I agree it is dumb, but I ordered mine from Apple to get the hard drive upgrade and superdrive, so I just had them install the memory at the same time. Didn't have to throw anything away.
[ 02-14-2003: Message edited by: icruise ]</p>
I'm sure rev. B 12" will have 2 fully accessable slots. and if the timing is right hopefully i will be the owner of one such machine
I'm sure rev. B 12" will have 2 fully accessable slots. and if the timing is right hopefully i will be the owner of one such machine <hr></blockquote>
Where's the confusion? The iMac isn't packing all the internals into a tiny rectangular enclosure. There's room in the dome of the iMac and room on the motherboard for more than one slot. Not the case for the PowerBook. I disagree with the certainty you have that the next revision will add another slot. Extremely unlikely; this would require a new motherboard and some serious reworkings of the arrangment of the components, among other issues.
[ 02-15-2003: Message edited by: FrostyMMB ]</p>