Headline is very misleading, and not necessarily correct. "Steve Jobs unveils changes to Apple's environmental policy" they did not CHANGE anything, they are simply making public their plans..."
THANK YOU.
The title needs to be rewritten; the use of the word "change" is not only misleading, it's a lie! What has changed is their openness, not their policy. You could say their policy of openness changed!
This site is going down the tubes content and fact wise.
This site is going down the tubes content and fact wise.
To my knowledge, AI has always been amongst the most accurate rumour sites. This has been especially true over the last couple of years now that Think Secret has become a joke.
Sure AI don't post rumours all that often, but the ones they do are nearly always correct.
To my knowledge, AI has always been amongst the most accurate rumour sites. This has been especially true over the last couple of years now that Think Secret has become a joke.
Sure AI don't post rumours all that often, but the ones they do are nearly always correct.
I don't think he's referring to rumor accuracy. Rather, I think he's referring to the increasing number of news articles with misleading headlines and/or content, with odd, and seemingly arbitrary digs directed at apple.
Apple was simply protecting trade secrets by not making the policy public.
What has it to do with trade secrets, except for the part about LED displays to be introduced this year? Jobs acknowledged that Apple have failed to communicate its plans and apologized for leaving customers and shareholders in the dark.
I don't think he's referring to rumor accuracy. Rather, I think he's referring to the increasing number of news articles with misleading headlines and/or content, with odd, and seemingly arbitrary digs directed at apple.
Yeah. Thanks for the recognition. Couldn't have said it better myself, and I didn't!
I won't deny the accuracy AI has found wih their rumours, but the way they present their articles is just horrible now. There are plenty of examples in their archives.
Not to mention almost every big article needs a grammar correction. I'm not saying AI is WSJ, but it's not exactly a blog now, either.
To my knowledge, AI has always been amongst the most accurate rumour sites. This has been especially true over the last couple of years now that Think Secret has become a joke.
Sure AI don't post rumours all that often, but the ones they do are nearly always correct.
That is because they name names, quote sources and--I love this part--even remark when the source has a history of being incorrect.
admittedly the Sony monitor has to work in a broadcast capacity. So it will have functionality that the Cinema Display won't. I'm not sure how much different that would make the price.
Well since its a Sony Broadcast monitor 50% of the price will be the special Sony 'Pro' tax.
Comments
Headline is very misleading, and not necessarily correct. "Steve Jobs unveils changes to Apple's environmental policy" they did not CHANGE anything, they are simply making public their plans..."
THANK YOU.
The title needs to be rewritten; the use of the word "change" is not only misleading, it's a lie! What has changed is their openness, not their policy. You could say their policy of openness changed!
This site is going down the tubes content and fact wise.
-=|Mgkwho
This site is going down the tubes content and fact wise.
Sure AI don't post rumours all that often, but the ones they do are nearly always correct.
Sure AI don't post rumours all that often, but the ones they do are nearly always correct.
I don't think he's referring to rumor accuracy. Rather, I think he's referring to the increasing number of news articles with misleading headlines and/or content, with odd, and seemingly arbitrary digs directed at apple.
Apple was simply protecting trade secrets by not making the policy public.
What has it to do with trade secrets, except for the part about LED displays to be introduced this year? Jobs acknowledged that Apple have failed to communicate its plans and apologized for leaving customers and shareholders in the dark.
I don't think he's referring to rumor accuracy. Rather, I think he's referring to the increasing number of news articles with misleading headlines and/or content, with odd, and seemingly arbitrary digs directed at apple.
Yeah. Thanks for the recognition. Couldn't have said it better myself, and I didn't!
I won't deny the accuracy AI has found wih their rumours, but the way they present their articles is just horrible now. There are plenty of examples in their archives.
Not to mention almost every big article needs a grammar correction. I'm not saying AI is WSJ, but it's not exactly a blog now, either.
-=|Mgkwho
Sure AI don't post rumours all that often, but the ones they do are nearly always correct.
That is because they name names, quote sources and--I love this part--even remark when the source has a history of being incorrect.
admittedly the Sony monitor has to work in a broadcast capacity. So it will have functionality that the Cinema Display won't. I'm not sure how much different that would make the price.
Well since its a Sony Broadcast monitor 50% of the price will be the special Sony 'Pro' tax.