Though, I agree with eboy. Apple should have gone OSX-only with the picture or used something like the G4 PowerBook's screen so that less attention was drawn to the monitor/computer and more to the operating system.
They should use something else than the "official MacOS X screendump". It have always looked too crowded for my taste. I also use a 1024*768 but my screen never look like that.
Perhaps they should have used the 17 inch. The 15 inch look a bit small on pictures and a Ti or the cinema display look too expensive
<strong>They should use something else than the "official MacOS X screendump". It have always looked too crowded for my taste. I also use a 1024*768 but my screen never look like that.
Perhaps they should have used the 17 inch. The 15 inch look a bit small on pictures and a Ti or the cinema display look too expensive</strong><hr></blockquote>
Yeah, I've always thought so too. I never understood why Apple did that.
Comments
Though, I agree with eboy. Apple should have gone OSX-only with the picture or used something like the G4 PowerBook's screen so that less attention was drawn to the monitor/computer and more to the operating system.
Nice try, Apple.
Perhaps they should have used the 17 inch. The 15 inch look a bit small on pictures and a Ti or the cinema display look too expensive
<strong>They should use something else than the "official MacOS X screendump". It have always looked too crowded for my taste. I also use a 1024*768 but my screen never look like that.
Perhaps they should have used the 17 inch. The 15 inch look a bit small on pictures and a Ti or the cinema display look too expensive</strong><hr></blockquote>
Yeah, I've always thought so too. I never understood why Apple did that.