Is OSX fast enough for you?

2

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 59
    nonsuchnonsuch Posts: 293member
    [quote]Originally posted by Whyatt Thrash:

    <strong>

    P.S and mouse tracking is too slow..

    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Download <a href="http://www.versiontracker.com/moreinfo.fcgi?id=12205&db=macosx"; target="_blank">MouseZoom</a> today.
  • Reply 22 of 59
    bradbowerbradbower Posts: 1,068member
    Yeah, OS X 10.1.2 is quite pleasant for me (faster than some other machines I've used, enough for me to get done what I want to get done, sometimes a little poky, but not enough for me to go into a no-holds-barred rampage bashing Apple for ruining the Mac or anything), on my 233MHz G3 iMac monster (160MB RAM, 8MB VRAM, 40GB/7200RPM HD)
  • Reply 23 of 59
    bungebunge Posts: 7,329member
    I'm doing find on a TiBook 667 (yes, I feel cheated after seeing the new iMac! ). I run the command line version of seti@home constantly and every once in a while I notice jittery dock behavior or something similiar, but then I remember that seti is running. Once I shut that down, it moves consistently well.



    I also work on a 733 Pentium Dell with Windows 2000 and it's a constant reminder of how much better OS X is than Windows. I can't believe how slow this system moves sometimes. My 667 PowerBook is definitely better than a 733 desktop.
  • Reply 24 of 59
    The reason I have hope that OSX has room to speed up in future versions, is that my problems with slowing in 10.1.2 are only intermittent and don't represent 100% CPU or memory usage when they DO occur. This tells me it's just something funky with one or more of the programs running when it happens (my guess is IE and/or Classic).



    Almost all the time, except these mysterious "waiting periods," I find OSX very usable on my iBook 600, and quite fast & smooth on my G4 450DP.
  • Reply 25 of 59
    iMac G3 SE with 768 MB RAM.



    Runs fine. But in running what? Mail? IE?



    I'll get back to you when there are some real native applications installed and run them through my usual work load.



    Right now I wait... <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />
  • Reply 26 of 59
    gfeiergfeier Posts: 127member
    [quote]Originally posted by Fluffy:

    <strong>Performance is acceptable. I'd say fair to good, but not excellent.



    Dual 800MHz G4, 768MB RAM, Dual Radeon, Hardware RAID (ATA/133 40GB 60GXP x 2).



    None of the apps run slowly, but the interface is slow.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Maybe it's because I moved up from a 120MHz 8500 last year, but I think OS X does have excellent performance on my dual 800. I can not think of a single area where I have felt it was slow in any way.
  • Reply 27 of 59
    I got a g4 466 w/128mb ram

    an osx is slow



    Entourage uses 20 sec to open, is this normal?
  • Reply 28 of 59
    [quote]Originally posted by eXistenZ:

    <strong>I got a g4 466 w/128mb ram

    an osx is slow



    Entourage uses 20 sec to open, is this normal?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Probably normal for people who run OSX with 128mb RAM. You could make OSX run a LOT faster by buying a few bucks worth of RAM.
  • Reply 29 of 59
    [quote]Originally posted by Nonsuch:

    <strong>



    Download <a href="http://www.versiontracker.com/moreinfo.fcgi?id=12205&db=macosx"; target="_blank">MouseZoom</a> today.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Nonsuch, I will worship thee as a demigod. Your noble visage will forever be imprinted on my coveting iris, fort it is thee that has solved the ailment of my non-scurrying mouse.



    I thank thee from the bottom of my wastebasket. Thou areth truly my idol.



    [ 01-11-2002: Message edited by: Whyatt Thrash ]</p>
  • Reply 30 of 59
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by eXistenZ:

    <strong>I got a g4 466 w/128mb ram

    an osx is slow



    Entourage uses 20 sec to open, is this normal?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    RAM is so cheap. Get some more.
  • Reply 31 of 59
    Yeah. Get some, go again.
  • Reply 32 of 59
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by Nonsuch:

    <strong>



    Download <a href="http://www.versiontracker.com/moreinfo.fcgi?id=12205&db=macosx"; target="_blank">MouseZoom</a> today.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Just downloaded it. Thanks for the link. it's great.
  • Reply 33 of 59
    [quote]Originally posted by EmAn:

    <strong>



    Just downloaded it. Thanks for the link. it's great.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    He EmAn, aint Nonsuch a great guy? Wanna join my new Nonsuch-worshipping club? What we do is, we stalk him and leave cryptic passages of T.S Eliot in his inbox every now and then...



    And, um... Got any ideas?
  • Reply 34 of 59
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    450Mhz Cube, 1GB RAM.



    Runs fine.



    I won't complain if Apple makes things a little snappier still, especially the Finder, but it's good enough that I can't go back to OS 9.
  • Reply 35 of 59
    [quote]Originally posted by EmAn:

    <strong>



    RAM is so cheap. Get some more.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    No, not any more, ram prices are 3 times higher than november last year, anyway i found a store where there are still some cheap ram left, so tomorrow i will go shopping



    i also changed the resolution from 1280x1024 to 1024x786, this made the interface react more quickly.
  • Reply 36 of 59
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    [quote]Originally posted by eXistenZ:

    <strong>



    i also changed the resolution from 1280x1024 to 1024x786, this made the interface react more quickly.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    yea, that pisses me off. there is a speed increase at lower resolutions. I like to run at 1280 x 960 but things just seem a bit more snappy at 1024 x 768
  • Reply 37 of 59
    [quote]Originally posted by Amorph:

    <strong>450Mhz Cube, 1GB RAM.



    Runs fine.



    I won't complain if Apple makes things a little snappier still, especially the Finder, but it's good enough that I can't go back to OS 9.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I think that the speed is good enough for most people to go to X forever. Having all of your apps on X is a different story though.

  • Reply 38 of 59
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by Whyatt Thrash:

    <strong>



    He EmAn, aint Nonsuch a great guy? Wanna join my new Nonsuch-worshipping club? What we do is, we stalk him and leave cryptic passages of T.S Eliot in his inbox every now and then...

    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Sure I'll join
  • Reply 38 of 59
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by eXistenZ:

    <strong>



    No, not any more, ram prices are 3 times higher than november last year, anyway i found a store where there are still some cheap ram left, so tomorrow i will go shopping

    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Really? I hadn't checked RAM prices in a while.
  • Reply 40 of 59
    Better than fair, but not quite excellent. How about 7 out of 10.



    G4/400 PowerMac 256M, and G3/466 iBook SE 320M, mostly IE, iTunes, iMovie, some games. Also a lot of Office and Photoshop under Classic, but I'm waiting anxiously for the arrival of my copy of Office X, and the release of Photoshop X...
Sign In or Register to comment.