Chimera 0.2.3 (another update)

2

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 43
    bill mbill m Posts: 324member
    [quote]Originally posted by starfleetX:

    <strong>Bill M:

    I've never dealt with proxies myself, but I thought you could use the System Prefs Network pane to set your proxies. No? :confused:



    [ 04-21-2002: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Yeah, Mozilla and Exploder both run fine with the proxy settings under the System Network Prefs Pane... but somehow Chimera 0.2.1 just won't work on my LAN, albeit it works if I go dial-up (no proxy).
  • Reply 22 of 43
    bophasabophasa Posts: 36member
    How is it that I use Mozilla, and this just creams it? This is just as fast as IE on XP. It kicks major ass! I logged into 3 different banks. Mozilla rc1 won't even get into 2 of them.
  • Reply 23 of 43
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    Later .9.9 and 1.0 builds and this Chimera render images dark and sometimes even totally messed up...hmmm.
  • Reply 24 of 43
    [quote]Originally posted by Bophasa:

    <strong>How is it that I use Mozilla, and this just creams it?</strong><hr></blockquote>Chimera isn't Mozilla as you probably know it. Mozilla 1.0 RC 1 is a CFM-linked Carbon app whereas Chimera uses a newer, leaner Mach-O version. The Mach-O version has one less abstraction layer to go through for system calls than the CFM version. Also, Mach-O takes advantage of Mac OS X's UNIX core for network calls and a few other things. The only major problem with using Mach-O is that no one has gotten plug-ins properly working with it yet.
  • Reply 25 of 43
    [quote]Originally posted by Eugene:

    <strong>Later .9.9 and 1.0 builds and this Chimera render images dark and sometimes even totally messed up...hmmm.</strong><hr></blockquote>That's because they've started tinkering with gamma controls. Technically, they will render more "correct" than Mozilla had been before and I think it will hook into ColorSync too. Right now, though, it's just kinda buggy.



    [ 04-21-2002: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</p>
  • Reply 26 of 43
    Anyway to import my 1100 bookmarks from IE?
  • Reply 27 of 43
    odinn5odinn5 Posts: 107member
    Just thought I would give a heads up about the Gamma/Picture problem. David Hyatt posted today on the mailing list.... [quote]I'm going to post a new version of chimera 0.2.2 at midnight tonight

    (Sunday) that fixes the gamma correction regression and that adds (gasp!)

    the Aqua look to form controls. <hr></blockquote>

    ...Looks like another late night waiting for the new update, if you into that type of thing
  • Reply 28 of 43
    IE5.1 seems to be faster.
  • Reply 29 of 43
    Chimera 0.2.3 is out. Here are the official changes: [quote]Chimera 0.2.2 was compiled with correct ATSUI (ATSUI with kerning and ligatures enabled). Yes, we have that working, but as you saw, it slows things down substantially. Chimera 0.2.3 returns to the fast ATSUI as the default. This pref will eventually be exposed in Advanced preferences (along with the ability to use Quickdraw as well).



    The gamma correction regression present in 0.2.2 has been fixed in 0.2.3.



    The form controls are now Aqua. This includes button, checkboxes, radio buttons, textfields, listboxes and menulists. Most importantly menulists now function!



    Some more crash fixes also made it into 0.2.3.<hr></blockquote>
  • Reply 30 of 43
    foamyfoamy Posts: 55member
    I really like the aqua form controls. Since I rarely use Omniweb, I forgot how tasty they are.
  • Reply 31 of 43
    Changes since 0.2.2 I've noticed.



    * Damnit! Default size for text is too small again. Fortunately, selecting "bigger text" gets it up to the right size.

    * Colors are wonky. It's gotta be more gamma problems. AI, for example, is way darker than in other browsers.

    * Rendering is faster, as noted in the changes above, giving no more Spinning Disk Cursors of Death.

    * Aqua widgets are working, but because you have to increase the font size (as I mentioned before) the elements are WAY too big. See:









    * Still no plugins.

    * Text entry fields still can't keep up with fast typing.

    *
  • Reply 32 of 43
    foamyfoamy Posts: 55member
    StarfleetX,



    Have you tried changing the font size in the prefs?



    Here's what I put in my user.js file (in the same folder as prefs.js) and I haven't had to use the 'bigger text' option in the menu. The drop downs still look bolded, but not as badly as in your pics.



    user_pref("font.minimum-size.x-western", 8);

    user_pref("font.name.sans-serif.x-western", "Lucida Grande");

    user_pref("font.name.serif.x-western", "Lucida Grande");

    user_pref("font.size.fixed.x-western", 12);

    user_pref("font.size.variable.x-western", 14);



    I haven't noticed any real lag in typing, but then again I type pretty slowly <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" />



    [ 04-22-2002: Message edited by: foamy ]</p>
  • Reply 33 of 43
    Thanks for the prefs info, foamy. I erase my prefs before each review so I know I'm not getting a different experience from Average Joe User.



    I'll try those changes you suggested for a while, though, and see if things are any better.



    As for the text speed, just try randomly tapping all your fingers on the keyboard really quick to "emulate" how faster people type. You'll see a lag almost instantly. Compare to OmniWeb or IE or even TextEdit to see how text should flow.



    [ 04-22-2002: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</p>
  • Reply 34 of 43
    Well, the text size and color problems have already driven me back to OmniWeb. Yeesh. Below are some examples of text on this page rendered in browsers with their default settings, in windows all the same size.



    Internet Explorer 5.1.4:





    Mozilla 1.0.0 "latest" (not rc1):





    Navigator 0.2.3:





    OmniWeb 4.1 sp 69:





    [ 04-22-2002: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</p>
  • Reply 35 of 43
    One last example of text size and color changes before I leave this thread for a while.



    Internet Explorer, Mozilla, Navigator, OmniWeb



  • Reply 36 of 43
    g4dudeg4dude Posts: 1,016member
    Holy shit dude, Chimera is WAY faster at loading web pages than ANY Mac browser out there. This is going to make web browsing on the Mac comparable to browsing on the PC!!! Chimera is great and it's only at 0.2.3! Everyone needs to congratulate the Chimera team for making the best Mac browser ever. Web browsing has been a big problem area for the Mac, no more! And the aqua buttons on the pages look really cool. I still can't load espn.com except for the main page though.
  • Reply 37 of 43
    Wow. I was impressed by Mozilla, Chimera blows me away! It's got a beautiful GUI, and it's fast!



    For now, the lack of plugin support, and other little things like the aforementioned color/gamma issues are going to keep Mozilla as my default and primary browser, but once Navigator comes into its own, it will definitely be my first choice.



    Here's looking forward to Chimera/Navigator 1.0!
  • Reply 38 of 43
    I'm having a little trouble with Chimera (and almost all the Mozilla builds).



    --Mozilla Mach-o : compiles. double click on icon, it starts to launch, but then quits.

    --Mozilla Fink Style: compiles. does not launch from commandline.

    --Chimera Binary download: double clock on the icon, it starts to launch, but then quits.

    --Chim Chim source: does not compile.



    The only thing I have gotten to work for me is the .9.8 Mozilla binary. UGH. Can anyone out there offer a suggestion? (#mozilla on irc was useless. )
  • Reply 39 of 43
    ricrocketricrocket Posts: 142member
    Though still very obviously in beta, Chimera is definately the future of mac browsing. My only complaint: don't call it "Navigator", geez...Chimera actually sounds cool and not so...well, not so 1995!



    rr.
  • Reply 40 of 43
    g4dudeg4dude Posts: 1,016member
    word to that riceRocket
Sign In or Register to comment.