Apple absent from universal phone charger push
Although AT&T and several other iPhone partners joined an industry initiative to standardize mobile phone chargers over the next few years, Apple has yet to follow suit and may remain committed to its proprietary dock-connector interface .
The GSMA and 17 mobile operators plan to develop a universal charging solution that would appear by January 1, 2012. Micro-USB will be the common charging interface.
The group includes AT&T, LG, Motorola, Nokia, Orange, Qualcomm, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, T-Mobile, and Vodafone. According to the GSMA, which represents the interests of GSM operators, the change would make things simpler for the consumer, who could use the same charger with all future phones and charge anywhere with any available unit.
The chargers will boast a 4-star or higher efficiency rating in order to be three times more energy-efficient than an unrated charger and consume 50% less stand-by energy. The GSMA estimates greenhouse gas reduction by 13.6 to 21.8 million metric tons as the replacement rate for existing chargers decreases.
Noticeably absent from the list of supporters is Apple. Its ubiquitous dock connector was introduced on the third-generation iPod in 2003 and has appeared on every iPod and iPhone since. By the time of the 2012 deadline, the dock connector will have been around for almost a decade.
In a possible nod to the iPhone's exemption, the GSMA targets only "majority" adoption by 2012. The BBC notes that the move may be a response to pressure from the European Commission, which has observed more than 30 different kinds of chargers in use across the European Union.
The GSMA and 17 mobile operators plan to develop a universal charging solution that would appear by January 1, 2012. Micro-USB will be the common charging interface.
The group includes AT&T, LG, Motorola, Nokia, Orange, Qualcomm, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, T-Mobile, and Vodafone. According to the GSMA, which represents the interests of GSM operators, the change would make things simpler for the consumer, who could use the same charger with all future phones and charge anywhere with any available unit.
The chargers will boast a 4-star or higher efficiency rating in order to be three times more energy-efficient than an unrated charger and consume 50% less stand-by energy. The GSMA estimates greenhouse gas reduction by 13.6 to 21.8 million metric tons as the replacement rate for existing chargers decreases.
Noticeably absent from the list of supporters is Apple. Its ubiquitous dock connector was introduced on the third-generation iPod in 2003 and has appeared on every iPod and iPhone since. By the time of the 2012 deadline, the dock connector will have been around for almost a decade.
In a possible nod to the iPhone's exemption, the GSMA targets only "majority" adoption by 2012. The BBC notes that the move may be a response to pressure from the European Commission, which has observed more than 30 different kinds of chargers in use across the European Union.
Comments
It is the those wall rats, or transformers that are the problem, not the cord or the connection. Transforming the connectors with adapters the way we use to use adapters to change from serial to USB. There are plenty of third party manufacturers that could and will do this if given the opportunity.
Since Apple products use USB to charge anyway, Apple is ahead of the game. Leading by domination.
This is welcome news. It's good to see the entire industry work together to achieve a common goal.
I dunno, better this than not this, but it seems to me like it's way overdue. That the industry is only able to get together on standards, when under pressure from outside sources, and just as the technology is going obsolete anyway does not speak *that* well for the industry IMO.
The way the article talks about energy savings is a bit weird also. Changing the type of plug to mini USB shouldn't have any effect on energy savings. It almost sounds like what they are really doing is changing the "brick" part to a smaller, more energy efficient USB connected thing, (like Apple has been doing for years and years). At least that's the only way I could see any energy savings, but I am hardly an expert in such matters.
Since Apple products use USB to charge anyway, Apple is ahead of the game. Leading by domination.
The point would be that any charger could plug into any phone AT THE PHONE END. It doesn't really matter if it's USB or a wall adapter, it's whether you can connect it to any model phone.
Apple will resist this as much as possible. They LOVE their proprietary connections (display ports, ac adapters, iPod/iPhone connectors) it's a great way to nickle and dime their customers.
Want to connect to HDMI? You'll need an Apple brand converter. Oh, you lost or broke your power cord? $79 please.
I dunno, better this than not this, but it seems to me like it's way overdue. That the industry is only able to get together on standards, when under pressure from outside sources, and just as the technology is going obsolete anyway does not speak *that* well for the industry IMO.
The way the article talks about energy savings is a bit weird also. Changing the type of plug to mini USB shouldn't have any effect on energy savings. It almost sounds like what they are really doing is changing the "brick" part to a smaller, more energy efficient USB connected thing, (like Apple has been doing for years and years). At least that's the only way I could see any energy savings, but I am hardly an expert in such matters.
Apologies to cowhide & Virgil if I'm wrong, but isn't the idea that the mini-USB will be the connection to the phone, not the power source? I wish Apple would do something like this, for when you are in need of power in a pinch, like the airport.
The point would be that any charger could plug into any phone AT THE PHONE END. It doesn't really matter if it's USB or a wall adapter, it's whether you can connect it to any model phone.
Apple will resist this as much as possible. They LOVE their proprietary connections (display ports, ac adapters, iPod/iPhone connectors) it's a great way to nickle and dime their customers.
Want to connect to HDMI? You'll need an Apple brand converter. Oh, you lost or broke your power cord? $79 please.
I'll take the benefits of Apple's ac adapter for laptops over the standard any day. Plus - what other adapter can you just go to the store and get a replacement for? With most laptops you'd have to order one.
That said - I agree Apple could do better in some areas. I never fully understood why their red-white-yellow ipod - RCA connectors had to be different.
I can see why they wanted the dock connector: for docking. And charging a royalty for access to the port. Could they have docked with mini-usb? Probably. But now it'll be ugly to go back.
Someone needs to slap Sony upside the head; no two products of theirs seems to share the same power adapter, or even voltage. I wonder what their CEO's home looks like in terms of power strips stashed under couches or behind furniture, all loaded with a menagerie of Sony wall-warts...
I wish Apple would do something like this, for when you are in need of power in a pinch, like the airport.
Why? The iPhone's is easily the smallest and most convenient AC charger available in the industry. The body of it is roughly a 1" cube and it's universal 100-240V. If you can't manage to fit one of these in your pocket/purse/briefcase/underwear you're in bigger trouble than any industry standard is going to help with.
An advantage of Apple's proprietary connector is that it's self-aligning, which isn't the case with any size of USB connector, making them fiddly to insert and unsuitable for a dock.
Apple, from the start, has used the the 30pin dock charger. Thats what they decided to use on their iPods (except the shuffle) and thats what they are using on their iPhones. Apple thinks different.
**NEWS FLASH** do you want to know why Apple has not come out with copy and paste or flash? Apple wants to see how other companies use this technology. When they see that others failed at it, they strive to learn from others mistakes and make it 10X better. Thats simple logic.
The touchstone from Palm is awesome. They should stick with it. Just because Palm and Aplpe are in the cellphone market doesnt mean they have to do the same thing every other comapny is doing
Why? The iPhone's is easily the smallest and most convenient AC charger available in the industry. The body of it is roughly a 1" cube and it's universal 100-240V. If you can't manage to fit one of these in your pocket/purse/briefcase/underwear you're in bigger trouble than any industry standard is going to help with.
An advantage of Apple's proprietary connector is that it's self-aligning, which isn't the case with any size of USB connector, making them fiddly to insert and unsuitable for a dock.
I wasn't suggesting that Apple makes an inferior product. But if you need to borrow a charger, you are often SOL, unlike PC users who can swap cords the live long day. And they can walk into a lot more stores to buy a replacement. This is becoming less of a problem as Apple has gained so much market share, but tell that to the G4 Powerbook owner who's lost or broken his charger.
The USB port as is or the mini is a universal plug, Several products from flashlights, to cell phones use the USB port to charge up. The computer is ubiquitous, and is the place from which charging can come from. If not the computer there are plenty of USB charges out there. All we need from manufactures is an adapter that fits on the end of the USB cord as a transitional device. By next year we could all eliminate most of the wall rat energy drains.
It is the those wall rats, or transformers that are the problem, not the cord or the connection. Transforming the connectors with adapters the way we use to use adapters to change from serial to USB. There are plenty of third party manufacturers that could and will do this if given the opportunity.
Since Apple products use USB to charge anyway, Apple is ahead of the game. Leading by domination.
Unfortunately, it's not just the shape of the plug. My Moto phone has miniUSB but refuses to charge unless it's a Moto brand charger or cable. There's no excuse for not letting me use the USB port on my computer or off a powered hub. I charge my iPods off the USB port on my Airport Express and my monitors USB ports all the time.
Apologies to cowhide & Virgil if I'm wrong, but isn't the idea that the mini-USB will be the connection to the phone, not the power source? I wish Apple would do something like this, for when you are in need of power in a pinch, like the airport.
You could throw this in your bag. It's a small adaptor that will let you use any regular USB or Firewire cable to charge your iPod. I assume it would also work fine with an iPhone. $5
I can see why they wanted the dock connector: for docking. And charging a royalty for access to the port. Could they have docked with mini-usb? Probably. But now it'll be ugly to go back.
Except then you'd also need a 2nd port on the iPod/iPhone because the dock connector does more than sync data and recharge the battery. There are pins for audio/video out, audio in for microphones, control signals from remotes and car head units, and the connections for Apple's radio tuner. The royalties can't be that much considering that the adaptor I mention above is only $5.
Not only people can change any cell-phone but also iPod all with ONE CABLE.
Welcome back to 2003 Mobile Industry.
Apologies to cowhide & Virgil if I'm wrong, but isn't the idea that the mini-USB will be the connection to the phone, not the power source? I wish Apple would do something like this, for when you are in need of power in a pinch, like the airport.
I don't know. I found the whole article confusing, thus my post.
All I'm sure of is that inductive charging and batteries that last days instead of hours is on the horizon which is the meaning behind my comment of them only getting together when the technology is almost obsolete anyway.
Whoever said it's a way for Apple to nickle and dime their customers is correct. Just because other comanies do the same thing doesn't make it right (like having to buy a $45 chord to get pictures off of your phone...e.g. Verizon).
The only other beef I have is having to have my iPod Touch tethered to iTunes (which, can barely handle the load of music I have.. while every other program I use runs peppy, iTunes crawls at a snails pace). It would be much easier if you could dock, and then just copy music to it like a drive (like most other MP3 players). That, would be simplistic. Not having to use a bloated mandatory software package.
Apple, from the start, has used the the 30pin dock charger. Thats what they decided to use on their iPods (except the shuffle) and thats what they are using on their iPhones. Apple thinks different.
No, they didn't. They started using a firewire connection. I have an original 10GB iPod that doesn't have a dock connector on it. It was the first model that was marketed as being PC compatible out of the box. I don't know my Apple history that well, but I believe the dock connector was introduced shortly after Apple decided to sell PC compatible iPods because most PCs/laptops at the time didn't have firewire. I bought a SB Live! or some such card with a firewire port on it specifically for this purpose.
Without the move to USB compatible cables, I don't think the iPod would be the massive success it is today. I don't think most consumers would go buy a card just to hook up an iPod like I did.
Just goes to show that sometimes Apple does bend to the market and not the other way around. If they thought firewire was such a bang up idea, they could have made the dock connector go to a firewire port instead of USB.
I wasn't suggesting that Apple makes an inferior product. But if you need to borrow a charger, you are often SOL, unlike PC users who can swap cords the live long day.
If you're talking about desktops, sure. Macs can do the same, for the most part.
If you're talking about laptops, I'm going to call BS on this, sorry. At my workplace, ThinkPads are (were, actually - we're about 50% MBPs now) the norm, standardized on only a handful of models.
Guess how many kinds of AC adapter plugs the conference rooms need to have? One for each model.
Same manufacturer, same line, different AC plugs.
If you're talking about the *cell* charger, then again, I call shenanigans. A 'PC user' has zero advantage here, unless the cell phone is charging off of the PS/2 port.
And they can walk into a lot more stores to buy a replacement.
If the store carries the charger and plug configuration for their particular model, sure. Much easier to just order it online from the manufacturer for most people, which puts it back in the same ballpark as Apple.
This is becoming less of a problem as Apple has gained so much market share, but tell that to the G4 Powerbook owner who's lost or broken his charger.
Since the PBG4 didn't use MagSafe (which is what I assume you take exception with), several companies produced a charger for it. Still do, actually.
okay, so why does Apple have to do what every other
company is doing?? I hate when websites post crap like this.
And I hate it when Apple fanboys post stupid stuff like the rest of your post.
Yes its good that multiple cell companies are working together to develop a same charger, but why does Apple have to conform to this just because others are doing it?
Because they're making a cell phone now. Because from what others have posted, it sounds like the EU is going to mandate a standard cell phone charger. So either Apple will conform to the standard or exit the EU cell phone market (though there might be some chance of getting a waiver).
Apple, from the start, has used the the 30pin dock charger. Thats what they decided to use on their iPods (except the shuffle) and thats what they are using on their iPhones. Apple thinks different.
Rolling eyes at the last comment...
**NEWS FLASH** do you want to know why Apple has not come out with copy and paste or flash? Apple wants to see how other companies use this technology. When they see that others failed at it, they strive to learn from others mistakes and make it 10X better. Thats simple logic.
So basically, Apple follows the Microsoft policy so many people on this site like to mock. They wait for someone else to do something and then copy it. Good to know. That really does sound like thinking different...