I think suing Apple because the iPhone can display ebooks is insane. I have been reading ebooks on a Windows Mobile enabled smartphone since a couple of years before the first iPhones became available in the United States. Why would Switzerland-based MONEC Holding Ltd accuse Apple of patent infringement when any smartphone capable of running PDF or CHM reading software makes an effective ebook reader?
I think suing Apple because the iPhone can display ebooks is insane. I have been reading ebooks on a Windows Mobile enabled smartphone since a couple of years before the first iPhones became available in the United States. Why would Switzerland-based MONEC Holding Ltd accuse Apple of patent infringement when any smartphone capable of running PDF or CHM reading software makes an effective ebook reader?
...because it's owned by Bill Gates???*
*the conjecture in the above post is fictional, any resemblance to any character either living or dead is purely unintentiional.
Comments
Exactly. Kindle is sold specifically as a book-reading device, the iPhone is not.
Sounds like a load of arse to me.
Maybe because Kindle is not touch screen, nor is LCD at all..?
I think suing Apple because the iPhone can display ebooks is insane. I have been reading ebooks on a Windows Mobile enabled smartphone since a couple of years before the first iPhones became available in the United States. Why would Switzerland-based MONEC Holding Ltd accuse Apple of patent infringement when any smartphone capable of running PDF or CHM reading software makes an effective ebook reader?
...because it's owned by Bill Gates???*
*the conjecture in the above post is fictional, any resemblance to any character either living or dead is purely unintentiional.
No LCD screen, they use e-paper.