Yes 6c115 is the gm BUT the retail one has a fue minor bugs fixed then the one that was put on the adc server weeks back <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" />
It's amusing when people post this nonsense. The same build, 6c115, that was sent to developers, is the same one that is being copied and boxed for retail.
There are a few known bugs in this version which will be fixed in an update that will probably appear early in September. There _cannot_ be other builds, simply because the focus at the moment is bugs in 6c115. Apple can hardly release one version, work on bug-fixing it, while another version is being copied and boxed which may have other bugs caused by changes, can they?
<strong>Yes 6c115 is the gm BUT the retail one has a fue minor bugs fixed then the one that was put on the adc server weeks back <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Apple will not have two versions of the same build. That would defeat the purpose of a build number.
Development on OS X doees not stop. There are more builds inside of Apple which incorporates bug fixes to this current OS branch and Apple's engineers continue to work on it. Just because something is declared GM doesn't mean all the developers pack up and go home.
I dunno... I would have thought the final build number would be 10.2. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> Or maybe X.x (aka "big X little X"). Just a thought.
<strong>Escher you are totaly right one of the changes done was remove the debug stuff. Atleast some one eals here knows what they are talking about.</strong><hr></blockquote>
If they change anything then it becomes a different build.
This nonsense is truly quite amazing. What developers received (6c115) = what has been boxed.
I've got my hands on the actual FINAL Jaguar, Installed it, and it does look pretty much the same as the 6C115 posted on ADC site. THe real, Boxed version came with 2 install cd's and another grey one(i though it was an update cd) developer tools cd. not much difference.
<strong>Oh yeah... it is 6C115 by the way... Lol! </strong><hr></blockquote>
It's actually build 6c115xzyeitzeketnbatyaebd, Steve Jobs has supernatural powers allowing him to modify the CD's after they've been made and sent to customers
This is minor, but in 6C115, Apple has removed the Aqua Icons screen saver...I liked that screen saver...oh well. <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />
<strong>Escher you are totaly right one of the changes done was remove the debug stuff. Atleast some one eals here knows what they are talking about.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Uh, you complete f*cking idiot: there are NO changes between the ADC 6C115 and the retail 6C115. The ONLY builds that ever have anything remotely what some people like to call "debug code" are called checked builds, and aren't even built for CD...they can only be installed via NetInstall on internally at Apple.
NO SEEDED VERSION OF ANY VERSION OF MAC OS X HAS EVER HAD "DEBUG CODE" IN IT.
There is ONE 6C115, and ONE only. And what everyone is using right now is IDENTICAL to what you get on the 24th.
Comments
There are a few known bugs in this version which will be fixed in an update that will probably appear early in September. There _cannot_ be other builds, simply because the focus at the moment is bugs in 6c115. Apple can hardly release one version, work on bug-fixing it, while another version is being copied and boxed which may have other bugs caused by changes, can they?
Currawong
<strong>Yes 6c115 is the gm BUT the retail one has a fue minor bugs fixed then the one that was put on the adc server weeks back <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Apple will not have two versions of the same build. That would defeat the purpose of a build number.
Escher
<strong>Escher you are totaly right one of the changes done was remove the debug stuff. Atleast some one eals here knows what they are talking about.</strong><hr></blockquote>
If they change anything then it becomes a different build.
This nonsense is truly quite amazing. What developers received (6c115) = what has been boxed.
[ 08-13-2002: Message edited by: Currawong ]</p>
<strong>Oh yeah... it is 6C115 by the way... Lol!
It's actually build 6c115xzyeitzeketnbatyaebd, Steve Jobs has supernatural powers allowing him to modify the CD's after they've been made and sent to customers
<strong>Escher you are totaly right one of the changes done was remove the debug stuff. Atleast some one eals here knows what they are talking about.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Uh, you complete f*cking idiot: there are NO changes between the ADC 6C115 and the retail 6C115. The ONLY builds that ever have anything remotely what some people like to call "debug code" are called checked builds, and aren't even built for CD...they can only be installed via NetInstall on internally at Apple.
NO SEEDED VERSION OF ANY VERSION OF MAC OS X HAS EVER HAD "DEBUG CODE" IN IT.
There is ONE 6C115, and ONE only. And what everyone is using right now is IDENTICAL to what you get on the 24th.