6D44 is up at ADC

Posted:
in macOS edited January 2014




[ 09-03-2002: Message edited by: JJ_WI ]</p>
«13

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 50
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    W00t.



    I mean... can't you give a brief description of what has changed since 6C115? Should be a lot, judging by the build # difference.
  • Reply 2 of 50
    defiantdefiant Posts: 4,876member
    junior members
  • Reply 3 of 50
    Well, i installed it and the only thing that is imrpoved a bit is quartz extreme. It seems to be accelerated a bit. But FTP still sucks ass. Especially in finder! They didn't do any effort to fix that. The same goes for ftp in terminal.
  • Reply 4 of 50
    What about the help viewer? Has that little problem been fixed?



    -Mike
  • Reply 5 of 50
    [quote]Originally posted by Defiant:

    <strong>junior members </strong><hr></blockquote>Watch it, Defiant. <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" />



    Just because someone doesn't post here all the time like you, that does NOT necessarily discredit his information. There are several very reliable "moles" that only post very rarely. Some use a separate, infrequently used account just because they don't want the leak pinned to their regular poster names.
  • Reply 6 of 50
    kedakeda Posts: 722member
    I'll throe a very specific question out there...



    Has/will anyone try this build on a Mac w/a PCI Radeon? Is the bug fixed?







    You sure thats not you, Mr. Senior VP of $atan.
  • Reply 7 of 50
    [quote]Originally posted by Defiant:

    <strong>junior members </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Why would I lie about something that's so easily disproven?



    My points in posting were to indicate that 10.2.1 must be close to release, as they only post the major stuff on ADC, and to give anyone here who has a seed key a heads-up to go get it before the email notification gets sent and the servers get flooded. Help Viewer, yes, Radeon PCI dunno.
  • Reply 8 of 50
    defiantdefiant Posts: 4,876member
    alright... I'm sorry JJ_WI for being rude.

    excuse me.



    and btw. I didn't wanted to say that it isn't true what he posted, I just wanted to express my anger because he didn't posted anything more specific.

    [quote] I mean... can't you give a brief description of what has changed since 6C115? Should be a lot, judging by the build # difference. <hr></blockquote>



    and, btw. I'm here running Jaguar 6C115 with a dual monitor setup.

    one of the graphics cards is a RADEON PCI, and I had no crashes or problems yet. Was there a bug ?
  • Reply 9 of 50
    SCSI any better?
  • Reply 10 of 50
    overhopeoverhope Posts: 1,123member
    According to *cough* Thinksecret, 6D47 has been seeded...
  • Reply 11 of 50
    10.2.1. is 6D42 I think. I'm pretty sure 6D47 is the latest build.
  • Reply 12 of 50
    akacakac Posts: 512member
    [quote]Originally posted by milanjazz:

    <strong>Well, i installed it and the only thing that is imrpoved a bit is quartz extreme. It seems to be accelerated a bit. But FTP still sucks ass. Especially in finder! They didn't do any effort to fix that. The same goes for ftp in terminal.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    ftp in terminal is totally separate from the Jag Finder or anything having to do with the GUIness of 10.2. So if you're having problems with FTP on the command line as well - it may not be anything Apple can really fix.



    I've installed 6D44 and the FTP is noticeably improved for me.
  • Reply 13 of 50
    WHAT? no fixes to finder-level ftp??? no, that would be a shame. :/



    from what i´ve heard, 10.2.1 brings the windowmanager recompiled unter gcc3, so that could be what you are referring to as improved quartz extreme... surely i wouldn´t mind another tiny speedboost.
  • Reply 14 of 50
    ah, Akac seemingly has had a better experience with ftp... so i´m optimistic again. <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" />
  • Reply 15 of 50
    overhopeoverhope Posts: 1,123member
    I've had no issues with FTP in the Terminal (except having to dredge up decade-old Unix knowledge <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> ), but the Finder FTP issue bugs me slightly.



    I really hope there's a fix for it soon: I wanna use this!
  • Reply 16 of 50
    <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />



    Has anybody got an old SCSI cd burner he could test in this new build? I still haven't given up hope that one day mine will work =) (Waitec WT624S)
  • Reply 17 of 50
    Overhope: i´d just like to have this clear... are you using a beta of 10.2.1 or not?
  • Reply 18 of 50
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    To clarify for Defiant...



    [quote]Originally posted by Chucker:

    <strong>W00t.



    I mean... can't you give a brief description of what has changed since 6C115? Should be a lot, judging by the build # difference.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    ...what I was trying to point out is that the creator of this thread made the topic headline so that everyone would immediately have a look at the thread ("6D44! YAY! Gotta have a look!"), while not posting any additional content. He could have at least said "I haven't tried it out yet though" or "These seem to have changed: ..." or so.
  • Reply 19 of 50
    overhopeoverhope Posts: 1,123member
    [quote]Originally posted by dr. zoidberg:

    <strong>Overhope: i´d just like to have this clear... are you using a beta of 10.2.1 or not?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Nope, I'm using vanilla 10.2: I've had no problems using FTP in the Terminal on the servers that I've logged into, though maintaining websites that way is a pain, especially when you really desperately want to reorganize the directory structure of one of them.

    <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />
  • Reply 20 of 50
    moogsmoogs Posts: 4,296member
    Can only select ADC people get at this? Is it in the form of an update (vs. the whole OS)? If so, how large is it? I've also heard something has been done to improve QE in this update. Guess Apple just wanted to make good on their Aug 24 promise, and decided to fix the rest later. Such is life in OS land.



Sign In or Register to comment.