If you shake it does it tell you who really carried out 911 and where the next false-flag will be?
Probably. You'll never know. I have yet to finish up the end product and submit it to Kasper for vetting. Till then, I'll improve more based on the comments here.
Here is an enlightening read for you, Mr. StateStudent. You might learn a few things about the way you'd like to use technology - tweet all your friends about it.
That you find a poorly executed social science survey to be "enlightening" is...ah...ironic.
Bauerlein study methodology was sloppy and the results predictably biased. The guy is an English professor without the formal training for conducting scientific research (even the fluffy social science ones) with any rigor.
Honestly, does anyone really give a s**t about this dictionary program? I mean come on.
What I really wanted to hear him respond to was the Google Voice rejection. That is what EVERYONE is upset about, yet Apple finally responds when it relates to some POS dictionary.
LOL, of course! Why do you think a high profile Apple executive responded to this particular case so publicly? Because this particular case of rejection IS justifiable -- it will therefore deflect public and judicial attention from the unjustified (and likely illegal) rejections. This is a basic PR damage control tactic.
There is always a reason for anything a corporation does. All you have to do to figure out the truth is to ask yourself what is it that is anomalous, and what explains the anomaly.
Comments
If you shake it, does it tell you where Apple is based?
You want that?
Sweet! Do you have a preview of it? Looking forward to it! I hope it'll be similar to m.digg.com
Right now it looks more like mobile Macrumors.
If you shake it, does it tell you where Apple is based?
If you shake it does it tell you who really carried out 911 and where the next false-flag will be?
If you shake it does it tell you who really carried out 911 and where the next false-flag will be?
Probably. You'll never know.
If you shake it does it tell you who really carried out 911 and where the next false-flag will be?
Which character was Apple in the 1984 ad again? I forget...
I would look it up but it got deleted from my Kindle.
I suggest you run to the nearest recruitment office and head to Afghanistan.
Here is an enlightening read for you, Mr. StateStudent. You might learn a few things about the way you'd like to use technology - tweet all your friends about it.
Amazon: The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future
That you find a poorly executed social science survey to be "enlightening" is...ah...ironic.
Bauerlein study methodology was sloppy and the results predictably biased. The guy is an English professor without the formal training for conducting scientific research (even the fluffy social science ones) with any rigor.
Honestly, does anyone really give a s**t about this dictionary program? I mean come on.
What I really wanted to hear him respond to was the Google Voice rejection. That is what EVERYONE is upset about, yet Apple finally responds when it relates to some POS dictionary.
LOL, of course! Why do you think a high profile Apple executive responded to this particular case so publicly? Because this particular case of rejection IS justifiable -- it will therefore deflect public and judicial attention from the unjustified (and likely illegal) rejections. This is a basic PR damage control tactic.
There is always a reason for anything a corporation does. All you have to do to figure out the truth is to ask yourself what is it that is anomalous, and what explains the anomaly.
You decide:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db7pKjUrNXQ
App store criticism or ultimate stupidity?
You decide:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db7pKjUrNXQ
Both IMO!