Never has an AppleInsider article with so little information garnered so much attention from posters who have so little to say.
Any mention of the terrible compensation package the PA folks received from Apple?
I did mention several times that some there didn't LIKE the package. You probably got that from my post. You don't know what that package was, so you can't say it was terrible. All you know is that they wanted more. Perhaps they are greedy. That's just as accurate a description of the situation.
I did mention several times that some there didn't LIKE the package. You probably got that from my post. You don't know what that package was, so you can't say it was terrible. All you know is that they wanted more. Perhaps they are greedy. That's just as accurate a description of the situation.
What's with the sheep-ish hate-on for a startup we know nothing about, aquired by a company whose free products we all use several times a day? This "Apple is always right and true, everyone else is wrong and evil" BS is weird, even on AppleInsider forums.
Back in the day you'd all be mocked on these very forums for being koolaid drinkers.
What's with the sheep-ish hate-on for a startup we know nothing about, aquired by a company whose free products we all use several times a day? This "Apple is always right and true, everyone else is wrong and evil" BS is weird, even on AppleInsider forums.
Back in the day you'd all be mocked on these very forums for being koolaid drinkers.
Comments
Never has an AppleInsider article with so little information garnered so much attention from posters who have so little to say.
Any mention of the terrible compensation package the PA folks received from Apple?
I did mention several times that some there didn't LIKE the package. You probably got that from my post. You don't know what that package was, so you can't say it was terrible. All you know is that they wanted more. Perhaps they are greedy. That's just as accurate a description of the situation.
I did mention several times that some there didn't LIKE the package. You probably got that from my post. You don't know what that package was, so you can't say it was terrible. All you know is that they wanted more. Perhaps they are greedy. That's just as accurate a description of the situation.
AFAIK, one issue was the AAPL stock valuation.
AFAIK, one issue was the AAPL stock valuation.
Can you link to a document stating what the valuation was? Or a link to an authoritative article spelling out exactly what their deal was?
Have to agree - it's like a early 90's design
http://www.9to5mac.com/files/u312/agniluxlogo.png
realy ugly!
Must be a "Photon Torpedo"
Or someone's gonna get "Beamed Up"
.
Back in the day you'd all be mocked on these very forums for being koolaid drinkers.
What's with the sheep-ish hate-on for a startup we know nothing about, aquired by a company whose free products we all use several times a day? This "Apple is always right and true, everyone else is wrong and evil" BS is weird, even on AppleInsider forums.
Back in the day you'd all be mocked on these very forums for being koolaid drinkers.
The logo is pretty bad though.