Because in a legal system that relies on due process and the presumption of innocence until someone has been proven guilty in a court of law, rather than the media, that is how things actually work...
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpamSandwich
I hate gen-Y thirtysomethings.
A 37 year old would actually be Gen-X, and we hate you too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkrupp
Just STFU. We have enough idiocy in this forum already.
This is easily the smartest thing posted in this forum.
At this level, He should have gotten a second mortgage on his home, bought a business with it, laundered the money though the business, paid off both his mortgages in a year or three, fixed his house, sold it, and repeat, until it was all disposed of. Real estate is the best way to launder in our country.
You speaking out of personal experience?
Honestly, I learned something today. Doing something like that would be very easy from the sounds of it.
this agreement is between this guy, the Fed Attorney General and Apple so that no apple secrets about how they do business are in the open record so any company could read about and learn about the inside dealings going on at Apple. This is probable as valuable as learning about new product ahead of time.
Apple wants to make sure that any of his specific testimony is not hear in a public court room and does not show up in the public transcript.
You're not a crook until convicted. In other words, YOU could be liable for some compensation due to the image loss caused by your words there, since as that man has NOT been convicted, he's not a crook... Fun eh?
Comments
Why would anyone take the word of a crook.
Because in a legal system that relies on due process and the presumption of innocence until someone has been proven guilty in a court of law, rather than the media, that is how things actually work...
I hate gen-Y thirtysomethings.
A 37 year old would actually be Gen-X, and we hate you too.
Just STFU. We have enough idiocy in this forum already.
This is easily the smartest thing posted in this forum.
He's right on the edge, so I vote to push him into Gen-Y categorization.
At this level, He should have gotten a second mortgage on his home, bought a business with it, laundered the money though the business, paid off both his mortgages in a year or three, fixed his house, sold it, and repeat, until it was all disposed of. Real estate is the best way to launder in our country.
You speaking out of personal experience?
Honestly, I learned something today. Doing something like that would be very easy from the sounds of it.
Apple wants to make sure that any of his specific testimony is not hear in a public court room and does not show up in the public transcript.
I hate gen-Y thirtysomethings.
There are none. The oldest of Gen-Y are 28. All current thirty-somethings are Generation X.
There are none. The oldest of Gen-Y are 28. All current thirty-somethings are Generation X.
See above. He's riding the razor's edge.
...they can't do much more apart from making the apple hq a max security prison
AppleMax?
Why would anyone take the word of a crook.
You're not a crook until convicted. In other words, YOU could be liable for some compensation due to the image loss caused by your words there, since as that man has NOT been convicted, he's not a crook... Fun eh?