I wouldn't be so quick to write him off. Like him or hate him, News Corp's WSJ is the only newspaper to have increased its circulation while others have seen double-digit drops.
Right- and we love the NY Post and its iPad app too.
aren't we missing something? how often does Steve do this? This is quite rare and may I suggest a possible opportunity to showcase the ipad2. They didn't say the event wouldn't be an Apple event, and we are due for another San Fran announcement.
aren't we missing something? how often does Steve do this? This is quite rare and may I suggest a possible opportunity to showcase the ipad2. They didn't say the event wouldn't be an Apple event, and we are due for another San Fran announcement.
Seems a little too soon for the iPad announcement but, I must admit, it does dovetail nicely with the Daily announcement.
Far better to have Murdoch picking content than the wacko editors at the New York Times...
Nihilistic drivel. Give us one example of "wacko" coverage of anything at the Times vs. its opposite at any Murdoch publication - that is, without simply saying that anything politically left of Rush Limbaugh, (or, just as subjectively/arbitrarily, right of Noam Chomsky) is "wacko".
What taints Jobs about this is it's going to be a colossal and embarrassing failure. Nobody wants periodicals. We have the web now. It's better. There is literally no argument that periodicals are superior to the Web.
Except that most of the "web" are blogs that re-tweet news from traditional news outlets.
Quote:
It's over, the Web won. Murdoch is a fool if he can't see it.
LOL - I guess we will see then eh?
I know I will be looking at it and if it's as good as it looks, a buck a week for a well put together and professionally edited source will be well worth it. It depends on how well they pull it off - time will tell.
He's got you fooled, eh? You think that's his total compensation? Or do you think maybe his accountants have figured out how to defer income, and thereby defer taxes? Could it be?
JOBS, STEVEN P'S COMPENSATION
SALARY\t$0.00 * mil \t \t\t
BONUS N/A
OTHER\t$646.60 mil
STOCK GAINS\tNA \t
TOTAL COMPENSATION\t$646.60 mil \t
Additionally, he owns over a half a billion dollars worth of Apple stock.
He's got you fooled, eh? You think that's his total compensation? Or do you think maybe his accountants have figured out how to defer income, and thereby defer taxes? Could it be?
JOBS, STEVEN P'S COMPENSATION
SALARY\t$0.00 * mil \t \t\t
BONUS N/A
OTHER\t$646.60 mil
STOCK GAINS\tNA \t
TOTAL COMPENSATION\t$646.60 mil \t
Additionally, he owns over a half a billion dollars worth of Apple stock.
That kinda taints Steve imho to appear on stage with Murdoch. But so be it, if this inspires other smaller publishers to use the ipad as a viable business option...
Why is that?
Personal feelings aside, both are exceptional, empire building CEO's, of the six billion people on earth very few are in the same class as Jobs and Murdoch.
Both are visionary and act on those visions to deliver new ways of doing things.
Is SJ aware of the repulsive bile this man spews over the planet?
SJ's ascendency into the Bilderberg echelons would have to entail some serious sodomy from fellow members. Is their no limit to the depths Job's will lower himself?
Personal feelings aside, both are exceptional, empire building CEO's, of the six billion people on earth very few are in the same class as Jobs and Murdoch.
Both are visionary and act on those visions to deliver new ways of doing things.
So did Hitler.
You live in a vacuum? How can you put "feelings aside" when Murdoch has made it his life's ambition to change people's feelings so they fit his poisonous right-wing agenda?
You live in a vacuum? How can you put "feelings aside" when Murdoch has made it his life's ambition to change people's feelings so they fit his poisonous right-wing agenda?
You sound like a knee-jerk lefty. Is a left-wing agenda (whatever that means) any less insidious? Communism was pleasant wasn't it? Anyways, back to the topic...
Murdoch has invested many millions developing an app that will aggrandise the iPad and take the platform to another level in digital news publishing. It would be odd if Steve Jobs didn't show support wouldn't it?
Personal feelings aside, both are exceptional, empire building CEO's, of the six billion people on earth very few are in the same class as Jobs and Murdoch.
Both are visionary and act on those visions to deliver new ways of doing things.
Murdoch's only vision was to give the stupid of the world what they want - either sleaze and naked breasts, or far right wing ultra conservative religious bile.
Why in he world would you want to read anything akin to FOX news. People who listen to FOX are given a lot of misinformation. They make stuff up and sensationalize the news in order to skew it for the Right Wing nutjobs. I'm really surprised that Steve Jobs would associate himself with Rupert Murdoch. They are one of the main reasons there is so much divisiveness in this country.
Why in he world would you want to read anything akin to FOX news. People who listen to FOX are given a lot of misinformation. They make stuff up and sensationalize the news in order to skew it for the Right Wing nutjobs. I'm really surprised that Steve Jobs would associate himself with Rupert Murdoch. They are one of the main reasons there is so much divisiveness in this country.
When Steve appears onstage with someone from a news outlet that isn't biased toward a political belief, let me know.
Comments
I wouldn't be so quick to write him off. Like him or hate him, News Corp's WSJ is the only newspaper to have increased its circulation while others have seen double-digit drops.
Right- and we love the NY Post and its iPad app too.
aren't we missing something? how often does Steve do this? This is quite rare and may I suggest a possible opportunity to showcase the ipad2. They didn't say the event wouldn't be an Apple event, and we are due for another San Fran announcement.
Seems a little too soon for the iPad announcement but, I must admit, it does dovetail nicely with the Daily announcement.
Far better to have Murdoch picking content than the wacko editors at the New York Times...
Nihilistic drivel. Give us one example of "wacko" coverage of anything at the Times vs. its opposite at any Murdoch publication - that is, without simply saying that anything politically left of Rush Limbaugh, (or, just as subjectively/arbitrarily, right of Noam Chomsky) is "wacko".
What taints Jobs about this is it's going to be a colossal and embarrassing failure. Nobody wants periodicals. We have the web now. It's better. There is literally no argument that periodicals are superior to the Web.
Except that most of the "web" are blogs that re-tweet news from traditional news outlets.
It's over, the Web won. Murdoch is a fool if he can't see it.
LOL - I guess we will see then eh?
I know I will be looking at it and if it's as good as it looks, a buck a week for a well put together and professionally edited source will be well worth it. It depends on how well they pull it off - time will tell.
He's got you fooled, eh? You think that's his total compensation? Or do you think maybe his accountants have figured out how to defer income, and thereby defer taxes? Could it be?
JOBS, STEVEN P'S COMPENSATION
SALARY\t$0.00 * mil \t \t\t
BONUS N/A
OTHER\t$646.60 mil
STOCK GAINS\tNA \t
TOTAL COMPENSATION\t$646.60 mil \t
Additionally, he owns over a half a billion dollars worth of Apple stock.
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2007/12/...Jobs_HEDB.html
Seriously, if you are going to be stupid, at least be funny about it so we can laugh.
He's got you fooled, eh? You think that's his total compensation? Or do you think maybe his accountants have figured out how to defer income, and thereby defer taxes? Could it be?
JOBS, STEVEN P'S COMPENSATION
SALARY\t$0.00 * mil \t \t\t
BONUS N/A
OTHER\t$646.60 mil
STOCK GAINS\tNA \t
TOTAL COMPENSATION\t$646.60 mil \t
Additionally, he owns over a half a billion dollars worth of Apple stock.
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2007/12/...Jobs_HEDB.html
Dimwit. That's a 2007 article that does not have any detail.
SPJ hasn't received any equity since 2003. No bonuses or salary greater than $1 since when he returned.
He just happens to have 5.5M shares of the company
and is the largest single shareholder (can't find the source right now). No unvested awards or any other compensation (bonus, ESPP, awards, nothing).
Dimwit.
EDIT : found it : http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...f053628S79.DTL
Far better to have Murdoch picking content than the wacko editors at the New York Times...
Agreed!
That kinda taints Steve imho to appear on stage with Murdoch. But so be it, if this inspires other smaller publishers to use the ipad as a viable business option...
Why is that?
Personal feelings aside, both are exceptional, empire building CEO's, of the six billion people on earth very few are in the same class as Jobs and Murdoch.
Both are visionary and act on those visions to deliver new ways of doing things.
Is SJ aware of the repulsive bile this man spews over the planet?
SJ's ascendency into the Bilderberg echelons would have to entail some serious sodomy from fellow members. Is their no limit to the depths Job's will lower himself?
Why is that?
Personal feelings aside, both are exceptional, empire building CEO's, of the six billion people on earth very few are in the same class as Jobs and Murdoch.
Both are visionary and act on those visions to deliver new ways of doing things.
So did Hitler.
You live in a vacuum? How can you put "feelings aside" when Murdoch has made it his life's ambition to change people's feelings so they fit his poisonous right-wing agenda?
So did Hitler.
You live in a vacuum? How can you put "feelings aside" when Murdoch has made it his life's ambition to change people's feelings so they fit his poisonous right-wing agenda?
You sound like a knee-jerk lefty. Is a left-wing agenda (whatever that means) any less insidious? Communism was pleasant wasn't it? Anyways, back to the topic...
Murdoch has invested many millions developing an app that will aggrandise the iPad and take the platform to another level in digital news publishing. It would be odd if Steve Jobs didn't show support wouldn't it?
Why is that?
Personal feelings aside, both are exceptional, empire building CEO's, of the six billion people on earth very few are in the same class as Jobs and Murdoch.
Both are visionary and act on those visions to deliver new ways of doing things.
Murdoch's only vision was to give the stupid of the world what they want - either sleaze and naked breasts, or far right wing ultra conservative religious bile.
Why in he world would you want to read anything akin to FOX news. People who listen to FOX are given a lot of misinformation. They make stuff up and sensationalize the news in order to skew it for the Right Wing nutjobs. I'm really surprised that Steve Jobs would associate himself with Rupert Murdoch. They are one of the main reasons there is so much divisiveness in this country.
When Steve appears onstage with someone from a news outlet that isn't biased toward a political belief, let me know.
Except that most of the "web" are blogs that re-tweet news from traditional news outlets.
Congratulations, you don't know the difference between forms of media and media outlets.