I know it is just a minor change visually, but I hated the old look. This is much nicer. I don't know the first thing about website creation so I will not comment on the code, but to me it works fine and looks great.
No, that's not what it means. It means he likes the direction it's headed and from what is visible, it's slick as he hated the older look.
Unless you want to split hairs and discuss degrees of gray, that's your prerogative. He likes the Mac section and hates the Pro Section.
Either way, the end result isn't that he hates the current site.
In 5 days the entire site will have the transition look. Should we wait until there is no area with any of the old look for you to concur that he no longer hates what he can't hate?
Thats way too many sentences in response to this flame-baiting nonsense spewer.
Not on safari, chrome, firefox, camino or opera it doesn't - no rendering issues here at all.
Really? Your FF works fine? FF on my PC at work is having an awful time of it. No image at all on the apple.com home page, just a bit empty grey square. And I get this lovely rendition of the MAC page. So they revamped their store so it only works on Safari?? That'll increase sales.
It looks like the navigation bar has different animations to no animation when written. On Store page it just appears. On the iPad page it appears from the bottom. On Startpage it appears from the top. Purposeful or some oversight?
I do like the new way the Mac and iPod page icons appears. I never liked the scroll bar to find products within each of those categories. Is that animation mainly JS?
In straight HTML5 [now just HTML] with language set to US English and the xml language attribute:
Code:
<html xml:lang="en-US" lang="en-US">
The added XHTML Namespace is definitely for a fall back. If you view this in Firefox 3.6.13 the Snappy Menu action of selecting the Search Text field doesn't work.
So instead of serving completely separate versions of the Site [One for XHTML and the other for HTML 5] they are serving a mixed site that has functionality only available for the HTML 5 version when the Client supports it. That's a browser header sniff there.
Really? Your FF works fine? FF on my PC at work is having an awful time of it. No image at all on the apple.com home page, just a bit empty grey square. And I get this lovely rendition of the MAC page. So they revamped their store so it only works on Safari?? That'll increase sales.
Restart your browser and/ or PC. You're probably cached.
Really? Your FF works fine? FF on my PC at work is having an awful time of it. No image at all on the apple.com home page, just a bit empty grey square. And I get this lovely rendition of the MAC page. So they revamped their store so it only works on Safari?? That'll increase sales.
Someone tells you it works fine for them in FF and then you try and say it only works in Safari... real nice...
Really? Your FF works fine? FF on my PC at work is having an awful time of it. No image at all on the apple.com home page, just a bit empty grey square. And I get this lovely rendition of the MAC page. So they revamped their store so it only works on Safari?? That'll increase sales.
Looks to me like you have a caching issue. Your screenshot has the "mac, applications, accessories, server" menu bar words in the wrong order than they are now, the horizontal slider doesn't exist any more and your top menu is the old style.
Comments
What software can be used to create HTML5 web sites?
TextEdit.
Anything that you can use to write text can make HTML files. I do all of my coding in TextEdit because of its clarity and simplicity.
I know it is just a minor change visually, but I hated the old look. This is much nicer. I don't know the first thing about website creation so I will not comment on the code, but to me it works fine and looks great.
All that matters.
That's what I said. Given that's all they changed, hating the "old look" means he hates the current site as well.
Just shut up. All you ever do is make this ^ exact type of childish argumentative post. It's old. Knock it off.
No, that's not what it means. It means he likes the direction it's headed and from what is visible, it's slick as he hated the older look.
Unless you want to split hairs and discuss degrees of gray, that's your prerogative. He likes the Mac section and hates the Pro Section.
Either way, the end result isn't that he hates the current site.
In 5 days the entire site will have the transition look. Should we wait until there is no area with any of the old look for you to concur that he no longer hates what he can't hate?
Thats way too many sentences in response to this flame-baiting nonsense spewer.
What software can be used to create HTML5 web sites?
I hope Apple is working on the next iWeb as we speak - full HTML5.
WONDERFUL!
Not on safari, chrome, firefox, camino or opera it doesn't - no rendering issues here at all.
Really? Your FF works fine? FF on my PC at work is having an awful time of it. No image at all on the apple.com home page, just a bit empty grey square. And I get this lovely rendition of the MAC page. So they revamped their store so it only works on Safari?? That'll increase sales.
I do like the new way the Mac and iPod page icons appears. I never liked the scroll bar to find products within each of those categories. Is that animation mainly JS?
Not completely. If you look:
the meta tags are self-enclosed which is an xhtml requirement.
HTML 5 eliminates them.
Why? It's a Void Element.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/meta.name.html
Therefore:
This:
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="Author" content="Apple Inc." />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=1024" />
Should be this:
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Author" content="Apple Inc.">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=1024">
Also the XHTML Namespace gives a clue:
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en-US" lang="en-US">
In straight HTML5 [now just HTML] with language set to US English and the xml language attribute:
<html xml:lang="en-US" lang="en-US">
The added XHTML Namespace is definitely for a fall back. If you view this in Firefox 3.6.13 the Snappy Menu action of selecting the Search Text field doesn't work.
So instead of serving completely separate versions of the Site [One for XHTML and the other for HTML 5] they are serving a mixed site that has functionality only available for the HTML 5 version when the Client supports it. That's a browser header sniff there.
Thanks, good info to know.
What software can be used to create HTML5 web sites?
You hit the nail on the head ... iWeb 11 and iWeb Pro please! Is anyone listening at Apple?
Just shut up. All you ever do is make this ^ exact type of childish argumentative post. It's old. Knock it off.
Ignore list if you don't want to have arguments about meanings of words, please.
Really? Your FF works fine? FF on my PC at work is having an awful time of it. No image at all on the apple.com home page, just a bit empty grey square. And I get this lovely rendition of the MAC page. So they revamped their store so it only works on Safari?? That'll increase sales.
Restart your browser and/ or PC. You're probably cached.
Really? Your FF works fine? FF on my PC at work is having an awful time of it. No image at all on the apple.com home page, just a bit empty grey square. And I get this lovely rendition of the MAC page. So they revamped their store so it only works on Safari?? That'll increase sales.
Someone tells you it works fine for them in FF and then you try and say it only works in Safari... real nice...
BTW - it works fine in FF for me.
Really? Your FF works fine? FF on my PC at work is having an awful time of it. No image at all on the apple.com home page, just a bit empty grey square. And I get this lovely rendition of the MAC page. So they revamped their store so it only works on Safari?? That'll increase sales.
Looks to me like you have a caching issue. Your screenshot has the "mac, applications, accessories, server" menu bar words in the wrong order than they are now, the horizontal slider doesn't exist any more and your top menu is the old style.
TextEdit. I do all of my coding in TextEdit because of its clarity and simplicity.
Got to love the auto completion, colored syntax and the auto indent. Not to mention the code look up feature.
for the rest of us...slightly new layout.
Got to love the auto completion, colored syntax and the auto indent. Not to mention the code look up feature.
And those really are the only things I miss. Compared to Dreamweaver, TextEdit is worth it, even without them.
What do you use? I'd love to find something with those three features that retains the simplicity of TextEdit.