I think this is most likely a prototype for iPhone 4 that Apple decided against. The picture shows the version to be 4.1 whereas I would expect it to be at least 4.2 if this phone was recent.
I think this is most likely a prototype for iPhone 4 that Apple decided against. The picture shows the version to be 4.1 whereas I would expect it to be at least 4.2 if this phone was recent.
But then again, what do I know?
Yeah, it's most likely a prototype from last year. But I do hope they bump up the storage this year. I think the retina display may have cost enough that increasing the flash wasn't within the budget last year. Apple will want to do something to up the specs for this year's model. They don't really brag out processor speed, I don't see them increasing the resolution, so barring some other hardware add-on, it seems storage is the logical lure to get people to upgrade.
There was also no competition for a 'retina' display to appear on the market...
I think this is real. By mass producing, or more relative, mass buying the 64g chips they also lower the price point of the 128 chips.
They are looking towards the future...
That?s a completely different situation. Apple couldn?t just use incremental display resolutions without negatively affecting themselves, developers and customers (something that plagues Android), yet they were already behind the curve using the same display resolution for 3 years running. They didn?t just pull Retina Display out of their collective ass, they planned for it.
Additional NAND is a completely beast. You can add more and it?s only affects costs.
I surely hope they add it, but I?d think the iPad 2 would have gotten it since the 64GB iPad seems quite popular, has plenty of room for the larger, and therefore cheaper, NAND, and there seems to be plenty that would have loved to have 128GB iPad even if it cost $999 and only came as the WiFI+3G model.
You get your hands on a prototype iPhone. You know the video you make of it will likely circulate globally and you don't even bother to clear your desk before filming it!? I don't understand that mentality lol.
It's an interesting development but AI's spot on; it doesn't really tell us anything.
Nobody needs 64 Gigs. If they did, the iPhone would already have it. Apple skates to where the puck is GOING TO be.
Tsk - between my very large music collection, space to record photos/video, and storing tv shows for the commute, the 32 GB isn't enough to contain my digital life. I've been patiently waiting for a 64 GB iPhone for a couple years already...
Comments
But then again, what do I know?
I think this is most likely a prototype for iPhone 4 that Apple decided against. The picture shows the version to be 4.1 whereas I would expect it to be at least 4.2 if this phone was recent.
But then again, what do I know?
Yeah, it's most likely a prototype from last year. But I do hope they bump up the storage this year. I think the retina display may have cost enough that increasing the flash wasn't within the budget last year. Apple will want to do something to up the specs for this year's model. They don't really brag out processor speed, I don't see them increasing the resolution, so barring some other hardware add-on, it seems storage is the logical lure to get people to upgrade.
I?m sure he meant XXX as in porn, not the Roman numerals for 30.
No, I think he meant a memory of three places as in 128GB, 256GB, etc.
There was also no competition for a 'retina' display to appear on the market...
I think this is real. By mass producing, or more relative, mass buying the 64g chips they also lower the price point of the 128 chips.
They are looking towards the future...
That?s a completely different situation. Apple couldn?t just use incremental display resolutions without negatively affecting themselves, developers and customers (something that plagues Android), yet they were already behind the curve using the same display resolution for 3 years running. They didn?t just pull Retina Display out of their collective ass, they planned for it.
Additional NAND is a completely beast. You can add more and it?s only affects costs.
I surely hope they add it, but I?d think the iPad 2 would have gotten it since the 64GB iPad seems quite popular, has plenty of room for the larger, and therefore cheaper, NAND, and there seems to be plenty that would have loved to have 128GB iPad even if it cost $999 and only came as the WiFI+3G model.
It's an interesting development but AI's spot on; it doesn't really tell us anything.
Nobody needs 64 Gigs. If they did, the iPhone would already have it. Apple skates to where the puck is GOING TO be.
Tsk - between my very large music collection, space to record photos/video, and storing tv shows for the commute, the 32 GB isn't enough to contain my digital life. I've been patiently waiting for a 64 GB iPhone for a couple years already...
Nobody needs 64 Gigs. If they did, the iPhone would already have it. Apple skates to where the puck is GOING TO be.
I need it dumbass.
The original iPhone didn't have 3G service or MMS and after everything was said and done, we now have it. So shut your hole.
I inoculate consummately...
We only inoculate consummate v's here, so...