Google Android continues growth streak over Apple's iPhone

Posted:
in iPhone edited January 2014
Google's Android mobile OS has continued to widen its lead on Apple's iOS in terms of U.S. smartphone subscribers, while Research in Motion and Microsoft have fallen even further behind, according to a new survey.



comScore's MobiLens report found Google Android to be the top smartphone platform with 38.1 percent market share in the U.S. during the period from March to May. The platform's 5.1 percent gain outpaced Apple's 1.4 percent increase to 26.6 percent.



The gains posted by Android and iOS were taken from BlackBerry maker RIM and Microsoft, which lost 4.2 percent and 1.9 percent market share, respectively. RIM's share of subscribers stands at 24.7 percent after the drop, while Microsoft held onto a 5.8 percent share. Palm fell slightly from 2.8 percent in February to 2.4 percent in May.



According to the survey, Apple maintained its lead over RIM after having passed its rival in terms of active U.S. users last month. Quarterly sales of the iPhone surpassed BlackBerry smartphones last October, with Apple CEO Steve Jobs remarking, "I don't see them catching up with us in the foreseeable future." RIM recently formed a committee to review its corporate structure after the company's struggles prompted investors to call for an ouster of its co-CEOs.



Source: comScore



In terms of handset share market share, Apple continued to gain on third-placed Motorola, though the iPhone maker still has a long way to go to catch its rival. Apple gained 1.2 percent to reach 8.7 percent of mobile subscribers in the States. Meanwhile, Samsung, LG and Motorola held onto the top three spots with respective shares of 24.8 percent, 21.1 percent and 15.1 percent.



Source: comScore



Also of note, the survey saw gains in the number of subscribers who reported using their mobile phones to play games, download apps, and use a browser. Subscribers who play games on their phones jumped from 24.6 percent in February to 26.9 percent in May, while 38.6 of respondents said they download apps on their phones, up from 36.6 percent. Finally, the share of subscribers who use a browser on their mobile phones increased by 1.5 percent to reach 39.8 percent.



Android saw the first blip in a two-year growth rampage last quarter when it experienced its first sequential loss of market share in a region since it began its rapid ascension in 2009. Needham & Co. analyst Charlie Wolf predicted last month that Android would resume its growth pace in the June and September quarters before experiencing a "material decline" in the December quarter after the release of the iPhone 5.
«1345

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 85
    helmuthelmut Posts: 12member
    the columns for apple are wrong.

    feb/2011 should be 26.6%

    may/2011 should be 28.2%

    and the increase is 1.6%, not 1.4%
  • Reply 2 of 85
    solipsismsolipsism Posts: 25,726member
    1) Based on the rate of the growth of the smartphone market MS looks like it's selling quite a few more handsets. Still, a loss in marketshare does look bad.



    2) I'm wondering how MacRulez is going to spin this article.
  • Reply 3 of 85
    cy_starkmancy_starkman Posts: 512member
    I read a conflicting survey only a few days ago. There needs to be an article disclaimer like with rumors cause if you took all of the surveys and stats at face value to each other then they are all worthless.



    What was the survey of exactly?
  • Reply 4 of 85
    anantksundaramanantksundaram Posts: 19,413member
    Frankly, no one serious cares. Not when Apple is said to be gaining share, not when Android is said to be gaining share, at the levels they are at.



    The only issue is who is making any money at this so as to cover their cost of capital. Apple is, Google is not.
  • Reply 5 of 85
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,294member
    I realize this is only for Smartphones but nothing of meaning can really be derived by this as





    a. Many people are waiting for the next iPhone, including myself, to upgrade

    b. Not including iPads and iPod Touch into the equation means Android vs iOS data cannot compared.



    I'd say the iPhone 4 is doing well considering it's a year old almost.
  • Reply 6 of 85
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post


    Frankly, no one serious cares. Not when Apple is said to be gaining share, not when Android is said to be gaining share, at the levels they are at.



    The only issue is who is making any money at this so as to cover their cost of capital. Apple is, Google is not.



    READ: "Apple continues to overcharge for inferior hardware while Google does not"



    Apple fanboys will never admit that their precious overpriced, phone is no longer the status symbol it once was.
  • Reply 7 of 85
    jawcljawcl Posts: 10member
    Samsung sells more than any others? Wow.
  • Reply 8 of 85
    brian greenbrian green Posts: 660member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by hmurchison View Post


    I realize this is only for Smartphones but nothing of meaning can really be derived by this as





    a. Many people are waiting for the next iPhone, including myself, to upgrade

    b. Not including iPads and iPod Touch into the equation means Android vs iOS data cannot compared.



    I'd say the iPhone 4 is doing well considering it's a year old almost.



    I'm with you on this. I intentionally skip models of Apple products, and even more so due to the two year contract I had when I got the 3GS. I intentionally skipped the 4, and am awaiting the 5. My credit card will drop the moment I'm able to get the 5. I think there are a lot of people waiting for the 5. We'll see how their numbers look after it's introduced.
  • Reply 9 of 85
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,294member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by bmedendorp View Post


    READ: "Apple continues to overcharge for inferior hardware while Google does not"



    Apple fanboys will never admit that their precious overpriced, phone is no longer the status symbol it once was.



    Goodbye. Thanks for the comments.
  • Reply 10 of 85
    woodlinkwoodlink Posts: 198member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by bmedendorp View Post


    READ: "Apple continues to overcharge for inferior hardware while Google does not"



    Apple fanboys will never admit that their precious overpriced, phone is no longer the status symbol it once was.





    READ: Apple's business model is sustainable while Google's is not.
  • Reply 11 of 85
    cloudgazercloudgazer Posts: 2,161member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by solipsism View Post


    1) Based on the rate of the growth of the smartphone market MS looks like it's selling quite a few more handsets. Still, a loss in marketshare does look bad.



    It's not clear, it depends on the methodology for the first number. I think it may be a survey of platforms by current phones in circulation and use. ie. Just because MS has 6% of the smartphones in use doesn't mean that they're selling 6% of phones now.



    The wording was clearer on the NIelsen survey which almost exactly matched the numbers for Apple & Android with this graphic from an earlier article







    The variance between RIM & MS in the two surveys is interesting.
  • Reply 12 of 85
    j.r.j.r. Posts: 27member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Woodlink View Post


    READ: Apple's business model is sustainable while Google's is not.



    I made a comment about this in another thread, and with that guy's comment (which is now deleted ), I'll repeat because I think he proves my point: Android users have an unnatural obsession with technical specifications. When I bought my iPhone, I wasn't buying it for the hardware, I was buying it for the software. Android users are the exact opposite. They always buy based on hardware, even with the emergence of OEM UI skins now becoming a point of differentiation for devices.



    I pay a premium (if you can even call it that, for me it's value added services - thus fair value) for things such as the App Store, the entire iOS ecosystem, the "user experience" first emphasis of iOS software design, and a mobile operating system that can operate smoothly and lag free with an 800 mhz processor instead of a battery burning 1.2ghz.



    But then again when you look at the amount of revenue paid apps generate on Android, I can see why Android users have a hard time justifying paying a "premium" for an iOS device: they're generally pretty... thrifty.
  • Reply 13 of 85
    kimys1022kimys1022 Posts: 26member
    I think any survey between android and iPhone is usually unfair... When you talk about Android, youre talking about the hundreds of Android phones out there. When you talk about iPhones, especially the iPhone 4, you're talking about one model by one company. For more accurate survey, I believe one person already said this, the survey should be between iOS and Google Android, or iPhone 4 vs one Android phone. I believe iPhone is the most sold phone and that no other one Android model broke the record (this is to my knowledge; please correct me if I'm wrong.)



    Yes, Apple products may be and most are expensive compared to it's competitors. But you should know, Apple product do last very long time as they are quality products. The sophistication and simplicity of Apple's design is really worth the price. This is my opinion, of course, and some others might dislike Apple's design theory, and that's perfectly fine. But to compare Android phones to iPhones, it has to be fair, model to model or OS to OS, not OS to one single phone.
  • Reply 14 of 85
    cloudgazercloudgazer Posts: 2,161member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Jawcl View Post


    Samsung sells more than any others? Wow.



    They have the top US share in handsets yes, but remember that includes dumb-phones. None of the free market research that I've seen breaks down the OEMs by platform.
  • Reply 15 of 85
    cloudgazercloudgazer Posts: 2,161member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by helmut View Post


    the columns for apple are wrong.

    feb/2011 should be 26.6%

    may/2011 should be 28.2%

    and the increase is 1.6%, not 1.4%



    actually it's



    feb/2011 should be 25.2%

    may/2011 should be 26.6%



    and the 1.4% is correct.
  • Reply 16 of 85
    jb510jb510 Posts: 124member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by helmut View Post


    the columns for apple are wrong.

    feb/2011 should be 26.6%

    may/2011 should be 28.2%

    and the increase is 1.6%, not 1.4%



    Actually NO.... If you look at the source (comScore) it should be



    Feb/2011 = 25.2%

    May/2011 = 26.6%





    Regardless, looking at any of this in a vacuum is going to be misleading...



    Hardwarre:

    Apple has never built more than two phones for sale at the same time and is claiming 8.7% of the entire phone market... that's freaking mindblowing... note this is the phone market, not the smartphone market.



    Samsung/LG/Moto seem who seem to release a "new model" every 3 months in a dozen or more product lines cover an entire spectrum of hardware from prepaid disposables to smartphones.



    Apple doesn't actually compete outside the smartphone market hence this statistic is easily misinterpreted. It's not inaccurate, just easy to misinterpret.



    Software:

    iOS is in use by 26.6% of smartphone subscribers. So, with 2 phones they own a quarter of the smart phone market. Still pretty impressive in my book. Could they build 5 different phones, sure, but there profit margins would be dramatically reduced... and then quality would be reduced to compensate and they'd be in the same boat as Samsung/LG/Moto.
  • Reply 17 of 85
    pridonpridon Posts: 81member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by hmurchison View Post


    Goodbye. Thanks for the comments.



    Google doesn't sell a product. If Apple gave away phones the way the android providers and RIMM do and could keep up with demand, then Android would be dead in the water. I would venture that Apple's 27% share generates 2X the profit to Apple than than the totality of profits of the multiple Android vendors. I don't think the Android vendors are absorbing the full amount of rebates and discounts.
  • Reply 18 of 85
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by J.R. View Post


    I made a comment about this...



    [...]



    ...they're generally pretty... thrifty.





    I couldn't have said it any better.

    I also skipped iPhone 4 and 3G. Worth to mention the point somebody made earlier, only Apple make real money on this and equally important their users are happy to pay for the privileges and not because it's trendy or pretty (although both are true as well).
  • Reply 19 of 85
    Android is cornering the market, iOS is still growing slowly and standing strong, RIM is bleeding market share faster than a kosher animal after slaughter, and still no one cares about WP7. Is ANYONE surprised by ANY of this?
  • Reply 20 of 85
    blackbookblackbook Posts: 1,361member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by pridon View Post


    If Apple gave away phones the way the android providers and RIMM do



    Well the iPhone for $49 is already pretty lucrative. If that were offered on both carriers with a reasonably priced unlocked version then we'll really see Apple make strides against Android providers
Sign In or Register to comment.