"Blair Witch Project"...is this any good?

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 36
    janejane Posts: 68member
    It is so bad that it gives bad movies a good name. What is most annoying about this movie is that the makers never heard of a steady cam. If you are scared well you are scared of your shadow; you should see instead Signs even though the ending is very violent.
  • Reply 22 of 36
    pscatespscates Posts: 5,847member
    Well, just got finished watching it.



    I wasn't even scared. It didn't suck, but I honestly cannot see what the big fuss was over!



    Some breaking sticks and a couple of distant children's voices didn't really do anything for me, fear-wise.



    Finding Josh's teeth/hair was a bit freaky, but I STILL kept waiting to "get truly scared".



    :confused:



    Wasn't a bad movie (I liked the style/tone of it, and how it seemed "real"), but I don't know why all those critics and reviewers were creaming their jeans about this being "truly scary!" or "the most frightening film ever made" or whatever.







    Not hardly.



    I rented it on DVD and there was, in addition to the movie itself, some other features, including a fake "documentary" about the whole Blair Witch thing (the history of it, leading up to these three dorks going missing). Had all these "professors" and media types (some good accurate-looking stagings of newscasts and interviews with Heather's "film school professor", etc.



    All that stuff was more interesting than the actual movie!







    Also, I watched the movie again, only on the second time I did it with the director's running audio commentary/voiceover. Interesting how they went about making it.



    A 6 or 7 out of 10 stars, I guess. On the Scare-o-meter?, I give it about a 1.2.



    <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />



    Glad to finally see it, but just don't know what the big fuss was over. Nothing really happened until the final 15 minutes or so.



    [ 08-17-2002: Message edited by: pscates ]</p>
  • Reply 23 of 36
    [quote]Originally posted by Jane:

    <strong>It is so bad that it gives bad movies a good name. What is most annoying about this movie is that the makers never heard of a steady cam. If you are scared well you are scared of your shadow; you should see instead Signs even though the ending is very violent.</strong><hr></blockquote>

    There was no steady cam! The whole idea behind the movie was that the group themselves were filming it on their excursion - freehand. It's deliberately shaky, but not so much were it looks fake or trying too hard. Don't forget, when this movie first hit limited theaters, many thought it was real.



    Some people didn't get it, and most of them hated it. It depends on the person (like I stated above). Did anyone see Blair Witch II? Now THAT is a movie that gives bad movies a good name! It was a bad idea and bombed deservingly.



    [ 08-17-2002: Message edited by: Patchouli ]</p>
  • Reply 24 of 36
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    I saw it in a little dark theatre on campus (Dobie!) with these weird paintings on the wall. It was me (by myself) with about 12 other people scattered throughout.



    The thing that scared me was the babies and the kids laughing with the shaking tent. Dead kids/kid ghosts/kid demons scare the hell out of me. Nothing else really does, but those always get me. Little girl under the bed in 6th Sense... :eek: :eek:
  • Reply 25 of 36
    buonrottobuonrotto Posts: 6,368member
    It made me seasick. But I watched it in the theaters. It was very difficult to keep looking at it, and that kind of ruined it for me. I should try it again at home someday, but since I already know what happens, it might not be worth it. It seemed like the kind of movie you can only watch once, subsequent viewings adding nothing to the experience.
  • Reply 26 of 36
    [quote]Originally posted by Artman @_@:

    <strong>The first B-Movie of the 21st century...with Eight Legged Freaks being second... </strong><hr></blockquote>



    I don't know why 'B' movies get so much hate nowadays. As far as I know the 'B' moniker indicates that they were the second half of a double-feature and the genre includes quite a damn few great movies. And if you ask me BWP isn't even a 'B' movie. Pitch Black is, maybe, and that is a damn good movie.



    Anyway. I saw Blair Witch and enjoyed it quite a bit, but I am easily self-hypnotized, especially by movies. (Why, hell, I enjoyed Pitch Black for God's sake ) Scared blue hell out of me, as well. I give it thumbs up.
  • Reply 27 of 36
    paulpaul Posts: 5,278member
    [quote]Originally posted by wyntir:

    <strong>



    I don't know why 'B' movies get so much hate nowadays. As far as I know the 'B' moniker indicates that they were the second half of a double-feature and the genre includes quite a damn few great movies. And if you ask me BWP isn't even a 'B' movie. Pitch Black is, maybe, and that is a damn good movie.



    Anyway. I saw Blair Witch and enjoyed it quite a bit, but I am easily self-hypnotized, especially by movies. (Why, hell, I enjoyed Pitch Black for God's sake ) Scared blue hell out of me, as well. I give it thumbs up.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    new b movies suck.... the old ones were really funny and entertaining.... i dono what happened... maybe multi-million dollar operating budgets for something that really should just be smoke and mirrors?



    Edit: what was that movie called where these "things" only detect heat and try and kill everyone... it ends with the hero covering himself with the fire extinguisher stuff to kill them all in one big explosion....



    i'm pretty sure it was one word... trackers? something like that... im so mad i cant remember!!! <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" /> sand creatures? damnit i cant think of it



    [ 08-18-2002: Message edited by: Paul ]</p>
  • Reply 28 of 36
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    Only one of the greatest movies ever to hit television with such entertaining consistency that you can watch it at 6 a.m. on a Sunday morning and not wander to different channels!



    TREMORS!



    Now that is a good piece of entertainment.



    [edit]



    Wait, they detected seismic activity, not heat. Maybe we're thinking of different things.



    The Predator?



    [ 08-18-2002: Message edited by: groverat ]</p>
  • Reply 29 of 36
    Is "Blair Witch" any good?



    No.
  • Reply 30 of 36
    pscatespscates Posts: 5,847member
    "Tremors" is tops on my list of silly "guilty pleasure" movies (along with "Harley Davidson & the Marlboro Man", "The Last Boy Scout" and "Dazed and Confused".







    "Tremors" is GREAT! Bacon and Ward are hilarious, and seeing Michael Gross (who for YEARS played aging 60's liberal dad on "Family Ties") play the prototypical right-wing, anti-government survivalist gun nut was great!



    Even Reba McIntire does a good job (as his wife, no less).



    That thing comes on AT LEAST once a month (it seems) on TNT, TBS, USA or one of those channels. I can't help but watch it!



  • Reply 31 of 36
    pscatespscates Posts: 5,847member
    By the way, did anyone else think this Heather Donahue chick was kinda cute in "Blair Witch"? She looked like a more "girl next door" version of Christina Applegate.



    She was annoying as can be, but I wouldn't have minded spending a few nights in a tent with her.











    Uh, yes?



    [ 08-18-2002: Message edited by: pscates ]</p>
  • Reply 32 of 36
    paulpaul Posts: 5,278member
    funny i posted late last night and just remembered about in when i read a post about B movies in the iBook thread in FH... and then it hit me TREMORS.... of course you guys were already on it....



    I don't really remember the plot as i haven't seen it in a while.... <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />



    any idea when it will be on TV again?
  • Reply 33 of 36
    [quote]Originally posted by pscates:

    <strong>Well, just got finished watching it.





    I rented it on DVD and there was, in addition to the movie itself, some other features, including a fake "documentary" about the whole Blair Witch thing (the history of it, leading up to these three dorks going missing). Had all these "professors" and media types (some good accurate-looking stagings of newscasts and interviews with Heather's "film school professor", etc.



    All that stuff was more interesting than the actual movie!







    [ 08-17-2002: Message edited by: pscates ]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    that's what i said



    the camera thing made me sick, forgot to mention that before <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />



    [ 08-18-2002: Message edited by: burningwheel ]</p>
  • Reply 34 of 36
    jeffyboyjeffyboy Posts: 1,055member
    [quote]By the way, did anyone else think this Heather Donahue chick was kinda cute in "Blair Witch"? She looked like a more "girl next door" version of Christina Applegate. <hr></blockquote>



    God, I was thisclose to predicting you'd think she was good looking, but I was afraid the screeching would turn you off.



    I thought she was pretty hot, too, especially since I love girls in tight, faded jeans!



    Jeff
  • Reply 35 of 36
    sebseb Posts: 676member
    I just saw Tremors 3: Return to Perfection tonight. Somehow, the fact that they made a third one had slipped by me.



    Michael Gross was the only actor remaining from the original cast.



    I went out to grill some food and when I came back to watch it there were these creatures called "assblasters" on it. Silly? Yep.



    The asian girl who ran the 'general store' had a graphite iBook SE though...
  • Reply 36 of 36
    pscatespscates Posts: 5,847member
    I saw that. Thought it was funny.
Sign In or Register to comment.