i have nothing to apologize for. since that was not a derogatory statement.
You may not have intended it to be derogatory, but it came across that way. Your statement was clearly intended to disparage Rubin as evidenced by your use of dumb and ugly. By including gay in that context, it naturally implied a derogatory usage.
You may not have intended it to be derogatory, but it came across that way. Your statement was clearly intended to disparage Rubin as evidenced by your use of dumb and ugly. By including gay in that context, it naturally implied a derogatory usage.
derogatory or not Andy Rubin is still dumb and ugly.
derogatory or not Andy Rubin is still dumb and ugly.
yes, because someone's looks matter a ton in the tech world. If they did, the world would be screwed.
As for being dumb, he was bright enough to get hired by apple, Danger, Microsoft, found android, get it bought by google, and now manage one of Google's divisions. Is he dumb compared to someone like Stephen Hawking? Most likely. But compared to the likes of me, he's a genius. Compared to the irrational hate/fear you're displaying? He's Einstein.
yes, because someone's looks matter a ton in the tech world. If they did, the world would be screwed.
As for being dumb, he was bright enough to get hired by apple, Danger, Microsoft, found android, get it bought by google, and now manage one of Google's divisions. Is he dumb compared to someone like Stephen Hawking? Most likely. But compared to the likes of me, he's a genius. Compared to the irrational hate/fear you're displaying? He's Einstein.
Guys, I have doubts that were dealing with someone very old. Between the big type, spelling, grammar, writing style and the types of words he uses as insults, I suspect FriedLobster is a teenager. That would explain a lot, including his avoiding any serious discussions or understanding of Apple topics.
I'm kidding of course. There shouldn't be any common sense argument for someone claiming rights to a shape, especially disregarding scale.
I just had a thought. You mentioned scale, so how do these arguments scale up?
What if some famous architect builds a skyscraper? and then in some other city somewhere, another guy designs a building that looks identical to the original (obviously the inside's a little different as he wouldn't have had access to the original plans). What's the course of action? Can you copyright or patent building design?
Good question. I'm certain some architects in Vegas know the answer, with scale copies of the Eiffel Tower and the Statue of Liberty coming to mind. In addition scaled "tourist trinkets" are pretty common. Now if they appear identical in scale, detail, etc, and considering many buildings are unique combinations of various basic shapes, I would suppose they could violate some design patent.
Comments
All this explanation and yet you can't bring yourself to retract the derogatory statement. Look, I'll show you - I shouldn't have written that.
See how easy it is?
i have nothing to apologize for. since that was not a derogatory statement.
i have nothing to apologize for. since that was not a derogatory statement.
You may not have intended it to be derogatory, but it came across that way. Your statement was clearly intended to disparage Rubin as evidenced by your use of dumb and ugly. By including gay in that context, it naturally implied a derogatory usage.
You may not have intended it to be derogatory, but it came across that way. Your statement was clearly intended to disparage Rubin as evidenced by your use of dumb and ugly. By including gay in that context, it naturally implied a derogatory usage.
derogatory or not Andy Rubin is still dumb and ugly.
derogatory or not Andy Rubin is still dumb and ugly.
yes, because someone's looks matter a ton in the tech world. If they did, the world would be screwed.
As for being dumb, he was bright enough to get hired by apple, Danger, Microsoft, found android, get it bought by google, and now manage one of Google's divisions. Is he dumb compared to someone like Stephen Hawking? Most likely. But compared to the likes of me, he's a genius. Compared to the irrational hate/fear you're displaying? He's Einstein.
yes, because someone's looks matter a ton in the tech world. If they did, the world would be screwed.
As for being dumb, he was bright enough to get hired by apple, Danger, Microsoft, found android, get it bought by google, and now manage one of Google's divisions. Is he dumb compared to someone like Stephen Hawking? Most likely. But compared to the likes of me, he's a genius. Compared to the irrational hate/fear you're displaying? He's Einstein.
Nice.
He is in fact the dumb, ugly and gay version of Steve Jobs.
Perhaps, but what you didn't know is that FriedLobster is a supermodel, and that's what really matters.
hey how'd you guess?
derogatory or not Andy Rubin is still dumb and ugly.
WOOOOOSH.
You completely missed my point, kiddo.
WOOOOOSH.
You completely missed my point, kiddo.
Or maybe i just dont care.
Who was it that teamed up with Motorola to create a phone with ipod capabilities then 2 years later released their own phone?
Are you? somehow implying that Apple stole iPhone OS' code from Motorola?
Are you? somehow implying that Apple stole iPhone OS' code from Motorola?
No. . . Just the rectangular shape. \
I'm kidding of course. There shouldn't be any common sense argument for someone claiming rights to a shape, especially disregarding scale.
No. . . Just the rectangular shape. \
I'm kidding of course. There shouldn't be any common sense argument for someone claiming rights to a shape, especially disregarding scale.
I just had a thought. You mentioned scale, so how do these arguments scale up?
What if some famous architect builds a skyscraper? and then in some other city somewhere, another guy designs a building that looks identical to the original (obviously the inside's a little different as he wouldn't have had access to the original plans). What's the course of action? Can you copyright or patent building design?