Design a better iMac - if you can!

Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware edited January 2014
Well, I have to admit that the design looked funny to me when I first saw it, but over time it's come to grow on me.



Look at what it gives you - very small footprint, a mobile monitor (15" flatscreen). Elegant design. The only improvements I can think of after a day would be to make the keyboard/mouse wireless (infrared, I think would be best). I would put a firewire/usb port on them for charging a small battery once in a while.



Besides that, I can't really think of any improvements in form factor at all. Eventually as time goes on prices on the 17" will fall, but there will most likely have to be a lead base to support it on the swing. The ability to go portrait with the monitor and perhaps 360 degrees of flexibility would be nice (eventually). And maybe a widescreen aspect ratio would be nice.







So, all you complainers or creatives out there - what would you do (in three years, today, whatever) to improve this design.



I think Apple did a kick-ass job, myself. Here's my personal round of applause to all the hard work they put in.



ps. As a test, I showed my wife a picture of it from the expo yesterday - prefaced with the "take a look at the weirdest computer ever". Her INSTANT reponse - "I like it!"...
«134

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 77
    macgregormacgregor Posts: 1,434member
    I admit, it is growing on me, except for the color. I think the biggest problem will be for many to think of it as a serious computer and as a design solution to that I would like to see metallics or a dark graphite option.



    I reserve ultimate judgement of course until I see how robust that screen is. On an armature like that I wonder if it will always look a little bit unlevel.
  • Reply 2 of 77
    g-newsg-news Posts: 1,107member
    3 years is a bit far off to think about how computers will look like then.

    PCs will look the same, that's for sure, but the Mac may as well look like a Teddybear or a pull-over, you never know



    G-News
  • Reply 3 of 77
    I think the whole thing would look better with a rectangular base (like the cube but shorter). Squish the cube down until it's about 4-5 inches high, inclue the fan of course, move ports to the back...more or less what everyone wanted.



    For me the contrast between the rounded base and arm and the more solid/angular/*square* monitor is too much to process.



    Still not accepting this as what an "iMac" should be. It's not cute enough to be loved, but too silly-looking to look "pro."



    -S
  • Reply 4 of 77
    macgregormacgregor Posts: 1,434member
    Yes, I like rounded rectangles more than hemisphere's.
  • Reply 5 of 77
    pscatespscates Posts: 5,847member
    "Uncle".



    They nailed it, as far as I'm concerned. I can't top it...don't even have any interest in trying.



  • Reply 6 of 77
    If it had a cube like base, you guys would be complaining about that. This is a very elegant design and I believe it will be a little harder for the rest of the industry to imitate it. I think we'll see some resemblance of this new design in the tower, perhaps in the coming weeks.
  • Reply 7 of 77
    Didn't I just say that I would like a cube-like base? You must not have been paying attention...
  • Reply 8 of 77
    A cube-like base? If that's the best we can come up with for a change, Apple's hit this one right on the head.



    I really like the free-motion of the monitor. I think it would be great for the business world, actually. I can't tell you the number of times I've been in my bosses office and had to walk around the desk or he's had to slide his big clunky CRT around.



    For myself, I can't envision the cube-base connecting gracefully with the neck. There hemisphere has a natural point for the neck to extend from, but a cube would just look like a stick sticking out of a box. Sure, you could round it a little on the edges, but if you completely rounded the top you're pretty much back to a hemisphere...



  • Reply 9 of 77
    I don't have a problem with letting "each element be true to itself," but there has got to be a way to have more agreement amongst the elements.
  • Reply 10 of 77
    [quote]Originally posted by SpiffyGuyC:

    <strong>I don't have a problem with letting "each element be true to itself," but there has got to be a way to have more agreement amongst the elements.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Agreement???They could not have pulled this design off any better. This is just what they needed something that friendly and open. You don't know much about design.....This design will draw people in and put them face to face with X. Then they will fall in love with the OS, step back and have that second look at the iMac. That second look that it took for me to fall in love with it.



    Hands down, this is a brilliant design.
  • Reply 10 of 77
    pookjppookjp Posts: 280member
    No improvements needed. I love it.
  • Reply 12 of 77
    bradbowerbradbower Posts: 1,068member
    I am strongly dismayed by the power button being in the BACK. Apple hasn't done that since, what, the LCs?



    I wish they had made some kind of touch-sensitive surface for a power button, like the G4 Cube had. <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />



    That, and the wireless keyboard, are about all I can think of to improve the iMac.



    Oh.. and where's the microphone!?
  • Reply 13 of 77
    I think the new iMac is a very unique (i mean that in a good way) blend of elements that accent the concept of a cool digital hub. Much like the Cube in that the Cube was only a full computer with the complement of parts (Square Cube-Round Speakers-Cylindrical Headphone Jack) ; the iMac is an all in one that uses these same elements. The new iMac base captures the idea of a "hub" quite well IMHO.











    I absolutely love the new iMac and I do have a G4 on my desk right now, thats why I just bought a new 800 Mhz G4 iMac with Superdrive for a grand total of $1,951 on education discount. A perfect blend of features and price not to mention looks. The Cube just doesnt compare anymore.



    [ 01-08-2002: Message edited by: Macintosh ]</p>
  • Reply 14 of 77
    kidredkidred Posts: 2,402member
    Well the base is what 10"'s or so. Is that too far to reach to? I think they wanted clean and simple, I power button anywhere on the front would've been obtrusive and distracting.
  • Reply 15 of 77
    [quote] I power button anywhere on the front would've been obtrusive and distracting.[/QB]<hr></blockquote>



    Well said.
  • Reply 16 of 77
    corvettecorvette Posts: 561member
    I think if the whole thing was chrome that would be cool.



    Also I still think they should have a cube version with same specs, and cheaper, since it wouldn't have monitor.
  • Reply 17 of 77
    The new imac is just so simple that it begs to be owned!
  • Reply 18 of 77
    sebseb Posts: 676member
    I feel that one of the coolest things about the round base is that there isn't exactly a defined front, back and side.



    I mean, sure, we associate the ports as going on the back, and with a power cable sticking out it would seem that way. But who's to say that you could'nt rotate it so that the ports are on the side if that fits your needs.



    This design, while shocking at first, does really, simply make sense.
  • Reply 19 of 77
    [quote]Originally posted by seb:

    <strong>I feel that one of the coolest things about the round base is that there isn't exactly a defined front, back and side.



    I mean, sure, we associate the ports as going on the back, and with a power cable sticking out it would seem that way. But who's to say that you could'nt rotate it so that the ports are on the side if that fits your needs.



    This design, while shocking at first, does really, simply make sense.</strong><hr></blockquote>





    Well stated!
  • Reply 20 of 77
    fishdocfishdoc Posts: 189member
    The power/ports on the back is the ONLY thing I don't like.



    Still, I am ordering the top model, so I cannot complain too much.





    Fish
Sign In or Register to comment.