Samsung COO met with Tim Cook to discuss supplying 'better parts' through 2014
After attending a memorial service in honor of the late Steve Jobs, Samsung's chief operating officer met with Apple CEO Tim Cook to discuss supplying the company with "even better parts" in 2013 and 2014, after its current contract ends next year.
Lee Jae-Yong, heir apparent to the family-owned Samsung Electronics empire, met with Cook for more than two hours after attending Jobs' memorial service on Sunday, The Korea Herald reports.
Arriving back in Seoul earlier this week, Lee told reporters that, despite the ongoing legal disagreement between the two companies, Samsung will continue to sell parts to Apple until 2012. On Monday, it was reported that Samsung will supply a next-generation quad-core "A6" processor to Apple next year.
Lee went on to suggest that he had talked with Cook how his company's supplier relationship with Apple will continue on after next year.
"For the 2013-2014 period, we discussed how best to supply even better parts," he said. Lee also mentioned that he and Cook had talked about past challenges and how to promote good relations between their companies in the future, the report noted.
The executive declined to comment on whether the meeting could lead to a resolution of the companies' legal dispute, saying only that his visit "was to attend the memorial service."
Apple was Samsung's second-largest client last year, behind only Sony, and is expected to take the top spot this year with an estimated $7.8 billion in component purchases.
As tensions have mounted between Apple and Samsung, rumors have swirled that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. would take over for Samsung in producing Apple's custom chips.
"There is a need to compete in a fair manner for the benefit of the consumer, and this stance existed in the past, is taking place now and will occur in the future," Lee said. According to him, the company is currently deciding whether to expand its legal actions against Apple or to hold off.
Apple first sued Samsung in April, alleging that the company had copied the look and feel of its iPhone and iPad. At present, ongoing lawsuits between the two companies number in the twenties and span more than a dozen countries.
Last month, the head of global marketing at Samsung said the South Korean electronics giant would be "more aggressive" in pursuing its rights after having held back because Apple was a client.
"We've been quite respectful and also passive in a way," the executive reportedly said. "However, we shouldn't be... anymore."
For its part, Samsung does appear to be taking steps to curb potential infringement of Apple's intellectual property. The company has indicated that, for the just-announced Galaxy Nexus smartphone, great efforts were taken to ensure that the device does not violate any known Apple patents.
"Now we will avoid everything we can and take patents very seriously," said Samsung's mobile president Shin Jong-kyun earlier this week.
Lee Jae-Yong, heir apparent to the family-owned Samsung Electronics empire, met with Cook for more than two hours after attending Jobs' memorial service on Sunday, The Korea Herald reports.
Arriving back in Seoul earlier this week, Lee told reporters that, despite the ongoing legal disagreement between the two companies, Samsung will continue to sell parts to Apple until 2012. On Monday, it was reported that Samsung will supply a next-generation quad-core "A6" processor to Apple next year.
Lee went on to suggest that he had talked with Cook how his company's supplier relationship with Apple will continue on after next year.
"For the 2013-2014 period, we discussed how best to supply even better parts," he said. Lee also mentioned that he and Cook had talked about past challenges and how to promote good relations between their companies in the future, the report noted.
The executive declined to comment on whether the meeting could lead to a resolution of the companies' legal dispute, saying only that his visit "was to attend the memorial service."
Apple was Samsung's second-largest client last year, behind only Sony, and is expected to take the top spot this year with an estimated $7.8 billion in component purchases.
As tensions have mounted between Apple and Samsung, rumors have swirled that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. would take over for Samsung in producing Apple's custom chips.
"There is a need to compete in a fair manner for the benefit of the consumer, and this stance existed in the past, is taking place now and will occur in the future," Lee said. According to him, the company is currently deciding whether to expand its legal actions against Apple or to hold off.
Apple first sued Samsung in April, alleging that the company had copied the look and feel of its iPhone and iPad. At present, ongoing lawsuits between the two companies number in the twenties and span more than a dozen countries.
Last month, the head of global marketing at Samsung said the South Korean electronics giant would be "more aggressive" in pursuing its rights after having held back because Apple was a client.
"We've been quite respectful and also passive in a way," the executive reportedly said. "However, we shouldn't be... anymore."
For its part, Samsung does appear to be taking steps to curb potential infringement of Apple's intellectual property. The company has indicated that, for the just-announced Galaxy Nexus smartphone, great efforts were taken to ensure that the device does not violate any known Apple patents.
"Now we will avoid everything we can and take patents very seriously," said Samsung's mobile president Shin Jong-kyun earlier this week.
Comments
"Now we will avoid everything we can and take patents very seriously," said Samsung's mobile president Shin Jong-kyun earlier this week.
This implies that it was not the case in the past.
"Now we will avoid everything we can and take patents very seriously,"
Yeah, NOW.
This implies that it was not the case in the past.
I thought more BLATANTLY SCREAMS.
Samsung senior execs would be generally well-advised to keep their mouths shut. They need better lawyers -- for starters, ones that can actually tell them to do so.
They need better lawyers -- for starters, ones that can actually tell them to do so.
Well, their lawyers can't tell their own devices from Apple's, so I'm not sure they should do much telling for a while.
A quad core running at 1.5 GHz will make one excellent iPad
So maybe Apple continues to use Samsung as a supplier, but I'm pretty convinced they want a bigger supplier base for these processors. Look what is happening to HArd Disk manufacturing due to one flood. Buying every thing from Samsung is just exposing ones self to a single point failure in the supply chain. I would think that it would simply be prudent to have those chips coming from two different factories.
Even assuming that this meeting took place, and that it went along the lines that Lee suggested, was there a point to his blabbering? Similarly, what was this Shin guy thinking when he shot his mouth off? Didn't he realize that this makes the company look really silly, and creates potential legal jeopardy?
Samsung senior execs would be generally well-advised to keep their mouths shut. They need better lawyers -- for starters, ones that can actually tell them to do so.
Was it in Korean? I am just saying, with the crazy translations floating around he could have just said that his bunions needed to rest from walking too much around Apple campus.
A quad core running at 1.5 GHz will make one excellent iPad
I was thinking more like a quad-core 1GHz Cortex-A8-based A6 for next year's iPad 3.
A
A quad core running at 1.5 GHz will make one excellent iPad
I would be very happy to see/own this! Even more so if there were apps built to utilize it!
I was thinking more like a quad-core 1GHz Cortex-A8-based A6 for next year's iPad 3.
Now, if we can get a memory technology into the iPad/iPhone to replace both the RAM and Flash memory in affordable, tens of GB capacities, these systems would be unstoppable, unapproachable and even way cooler!
All the best.
Samsung is important to Apple, it would not surprise me at all for Tim to work hard at smoothing the relationship between the two companies. Further, I'll bet that it is in Tim's nature to do so.
Next to Japan, which country in Asia is most trusted by the US as a long-term partner?
Samsung is important to Apple, it would not surprise me at all for Tim to work hard at smoothing the relationship between the two companies. Further, I'll bet that it is in Tim's nature to do so.
I would have cut off Samsung from the supply-chain. Samsung used its insider knowledge as an Apple supplier to copy Apple products.
Next to Japan, which country in Asia is most trusted by the US as a long-term partner.
Taiwan.
Taiwan.
Sure, Taiwan ia an ally, however, no one can be certain that it can remain a long-term partner.
Apple has to use multiple suppliers with geographic diversification to reduce risk... even if costs more. Why not Intel? IBM? They are not going to double cross Apple.