HP to keep PC business, future of webOS still uncertain

Posted:
in iPad edited January 2014
Two weeks after calling an internal all hands meeting to discuss the status of its Personal Systems Group making PCs and mobile devices, HP has finally announced it will keep the division rather than spinning it off or selling it.



In a press release issued today, HP's new president and chief executive officer Meg Whitman announced that "HP objectively evaluated the strategic, financial and operational impact of spinning off PSG. It?s clear after our analysis that keeping PSG within HP is right for customers and partners, right for shareholders, and right for employees.?



The decision to hold on to the PSG division was based upon a realization of "the depth of the integration that has occurred across key operations such as supply chain, IT and procurement" and the "significant extent to which PSG contributes to HP?s solutions portfolio and overall brand value."



Meg Whitman brought to tears by Apotheker's ransacking of HP



Just over two months have passed since HP's former chief executive Léo Apotheker made the announcement on August 18 that HP would be evaluating what to do with its PSG unit, potentially selling it or spinning it off into a subsidiary.



Two weeks ago at an internal employee meeting, HP executive Jon Rubinstein told employees that the company's new chief executive had been "brought to tears" when briefed on the extent of Apotheker's announced strategy for HP, which was described as "crazy" according to people in attendance.



Rubinstein arrived at HP from Palm last year; he formerly worked with Steve Jobs at NeXT before joining Apple and helping to turn it around as the senior vice president of hardware engineering. He made key decisions shaping products from the original iMac to the G4 PowerMacs and the original iPod. He left Apple in 2006.



The meltdown of HP over the last year has left Rubinstein, his webOS and the Pre smartphones and TouchPad tablet products he managed at Palm up in the air, particularly after Apotheker pulled the plug on webOS hardware and left its future in doubt as he announced plans to turn HP into an enterprise software company.







Conference call clarifications



"Uncertainty in business is never your friend," Whitman told analysts in a conference call held today. She described the decision to keep PSG as the product of strategic review and data-driven evaluation conducted by 18 different teams who "dove deep into this," saying it was "an impressive thing to watch" while saying HP needed to validate the "real value in the combination."



Whitman explained that the costs and risks of a separation would be greater than any potential savings of spinning the PC group off, noting that the group contributes $1 billion in operational profit, provides supply chain efficiencies and improves component pricing, distribution and procurement leverage while contributing to gross margins for both PCs and the separate server products Apotheker planned to keep.



Splitting PSG off would "lose synergies in the channel, sales, and marking," and result in the expense of creating a new brand. The company indicated a spinoff of PSG would require an additional $1.5 billion in startup costs, including IT support, finance and operations.



Whitman said the "decision was very straightforward" in the end, although she was actively serving as a member of the HP board when it approved Apotheker's plans to shift HP into a very different enterprise software company just a few months ago.



What about webOS?



Whitman responded to questions about building tablets in the future by saying "we're certainly going to be in tablets," while implying that the company's tablet strategy would be tied to Microsoft's release of Windows 8 next fall. "We're going to take another run at this business," she said.



A decision on webOS will come in "the next couple months" and not be tied to the decision to keep PSG. Whitman said HP "needed to make a more holistic" decision regarding the mobile OS it acquired from Palm last year for $1.3 billion.



Prior to buying Palm last summer, HP joined Microsoft on stage to launch the "Slate PC" running Windows 7 at the beginning of 2010, a product which was also a colossal failure for HP.



HP made no mention of its smartphone plans or whether the company would pursue webOS phones or shift back to making Windows Phone 7 devices. Todd Bradley, HP's executive vice president of PSG, repeated HP's interest in tablets without elaborating details while also making mention of the importance of new ultramobile notebooks. When an analyst asked about HP's smartphone plans, Bradley clarified that "ultramobile" pertained to thin notebooks and had nothing to do with smartphones.



Bradley also noted that the PSG had been restructured in July to focus on "commercial, consumer premium and consumer volume" customers, and noted that HP was investing in emerging markets and "well position to compete and win." His announcements were largely limited to affirming HP's decision to keep the PSG in house, saying that the need for clarity on the matter had been demanded by HP's clients.



"We heard this very clearly when we spoke with customers," Bradley said.



HP's internal webOS group has reported suffered only minor attrition so far, according to a source familiar with the group's status, but likened its future prospects to sushi in terms of its ability to sit around waiting to be served.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 19
    Couldn't find any takers, eh?
  • Reply 2 of 19
    Quote:

    ?to keep PC business?



    Frig. Too bad.
  • Reply 3 of 19
    Boo Hoo F'N Hoo!! What is this? PC Insider?
  • Reply 4 of 19
    Dan_DilgerDan_Dilger Posts: 1,583member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by VisualZone View Post


    Boo Hoo F'N Hoo!! What is this? PC Insider?



    HP is the #1 PC maker. If you don't understand the relevance to Apple, go eat fish and read a book.
  • Reply 5 of 19
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Corrections View Post


    HP is the #1 PC maker. If you don't understand the relevance to Apple, go eat fish and read a book.



    Boo Hoo F'N Hoo to you too. Even Meg Whitman was brought to tears. lol Who cares about HP? I don't!! I'm here for Apple news. Okay? Got it?
  • Reply 6 of 19
    All of us Touchpad owners will continue to wait with baited breath.
  • Reply 7 of 19
    john.bjohn.b Posts: 2,742member
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGFXGwHsD_A



    I'm not dead.



    I'm getting better.



    I feel happy. I feel happy.
  • Reply 8 of 19
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by VisualZone View Post


    Boo Hoo F'N Hoo to you too. Even Meg Whitman was brought to tears. lol Who cares about HP? I don't!! I'm here for Apple news. Okay? Got it?



    Here's a shocking concept: maybe don't read THESE news stories, then?
  • Reply 9 of 19
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


    Here's a shocking concept: maybe don't read THESE news stories, then?



    Hmm, maybe I thought there was something to do with Apple? Maybe something about WebOS to iOS? But upon reading I seen nothing just like your post.
  • Reply 10 of 19
    Dan_DilgerDan_Dilger Posts: 1,583member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by VisualZone View Post


    Hmm, maybe I thought there was something to do with Apple? Maybe something about WebOS to iOS? But upon reading I seen nothing just like your post.



    Take your meds and a nap, then eat fish and read a book.
  • Reply 11 of 19
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by VisualZone View Post


    But upon reading I seen nothing just like your post.



    The title made no mention of Apple. 2nd grade English class teaches you about context clues. Did you forget that?
  • Reply 12 of 19
    freerangefreerange Posts: 1,597member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by VisualZone View Post


    Boo Hoo F'N Hoo to you too. Even Meg Whitman was brought to tears. lol Who cares about HP? I don't!! I'm here for Apple news. Okay? Got it?



    Hey dumb dumb! This does have ramifications for apple. The fact that you don't understand it doesn't make it any less so! What they do with their PC market, and Web OS will have direct impact on Apple as to the competitive landscape so yes, we are interested. Grow up!
  • Reply 13 of 19
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by FreeRange View Post


    Hey dumb dumb! This does have ramifications for apple. The fact that you don't understand it doesn't make it any less so! What they do with their PC market, and Web OS will have direct impact on Apple as to the competitive landscape so yes, we are interested. Grow up!



    Grow up? Who's doing the name calling? I understand perfectly!! WebOS...Bah Humbug!! Their tablets? LMAO!! HPs PC division? Another joke. Btw, I think you don't understand!! Reread my posts. I come here to AppleInsider not PCinsider!! I subscribe to MacWorld not PC World!! I could go on but I wouldn't want to lower myself to your level. GOODBYE!!
  • Reply 14 of 19
    What's interesting is Rubenstein's failures in the context of what he could have done for HP (or maybe HP had just really lost the plot). With all due respect to him, post-Apple he really hasn't quite come to the fore. And indeed:



    SPOILER ALERT RE: STEVE JOBS BIOGRAPHY















    (My words here) Steve said something along the lines that Rubinstein wasn't good enough, and that this was validated by the Pre (or other) failure. Rubinstein was upset that he had to pull off engineering magic in the face of ever more demanding (indulgent?) designs. To quote from the book:



    "Rubinstein... was upset by Cook's ascendancy... [and] was repeatedly clashing with Jony Ive, who used to work for him and now reported directly to Jobs... At times Ive and Rubinstein got into arguments that almost led to blows. Finally Ive told Jobs, "It's him or me." Jobs chose Ive... [Jobs later said], "The fact that they completely failed salves that wound [of Rubinstein going to Palm]" and "In the end, Ruby's from HP... he never delved deep, he wasn't aggressive".
  • Reply 15 of 19
    This was a prudent move on Meg's part, but much damage has been done to HP's brand and reputation. I know this may come as a surprise to some, but HP really only cares about it's corporate customers. Consumer PC's ARE money loser for the company. As for WebOS and the tablets/smartphone business they acquired from Palm, I would look for HP to sell, spin-off, shut it down altogether and go with an Android + Windows strategy. This is a huge cash sink and not something that HP is capable of pulling off in my opinion. It makes sense that HP would wait to announce what they plan to do with the division, but it's clear from today's announcement that they are not planning to keep it...
  • Reply 16 of 19
    asciiascii Posts: 5,936member
    I still think 3d printers/prototypers is the way to go for them. It is a new product area with plenty of potential for growth. They can use their ink-distribution network to distribute the little plastic pellets that you load it with. And they can leverage their knowledge of print heads etc, which surely must be cross-domain with prototypers.



    If they just sell Windows boxes it will be a low margin, low fun business. If they can do something with their own OS, like Apple, maybe up the margins. But people don't replace computers very often. It takes years to grab market share. It just seems like it will be an uphill battle for minimal reward.
  • Reply 17 of 19
    maecvsmaecvs Posts: 129member
    If Microsloth were smart, they would have made a play for HP's PC division. Then they could have tried the unified hardware/software integration, a-la Apple.
  • Reply 18 of 19
    shaun, ukshaun, uk Posts: 1,050member
    WebOS is actually pretty good and the HP Tablet wasn't that bad. It just wasn't as good as the iPad. I can understand the synergies of linking to MS as it ties in with their PC business but I think it would be a big mistake to drop WebOS for Windows Mobile.



    It'll be really interesting to see how the tablet market pans out over the next few years. Will the iPad replicate the iPod and dominate with 70% market share while the others fade away? I know the arguments about price but there have always been cheaper MP3 on the market and yet the iPod continues to dominate.
  • Reply 19 of 19
    I'm curious to what the people who read appleinsider thought about webOS. Personally, I love it and thought it was an extremely viable alternative to other mobile OS's. I hope that it stays alive either with HP or another company, and makes a comeback.
Sign In or Register to comment.