Google, Sprint file briefs opposing injunction of Samsung Galaxy Nexus

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 25

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by dasanman69 View Post





    Google didn't tell them to make Touch Wiz look so much like iOS.


     


    Are you crazy??


    TouchWiz is much better, looking and customizing than iOS... iOS is a simple interface software going side to side, were Android with TouchWiz is a completely customizable and modifiable interface.


    You have to see and touch a TouchWiz enable phone before to talk... many of you even have touched an Android phone.

  • Reply 22 of 25
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member
    TouchWiz is much better, looking and customizing than iOS…

    Couldn't care less. I want the one that is much better operating.
  • Reply 23 of 25
    loptimistloptimist Posts: 113member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tristan Thomas View Post


    Searching through apps via search bar on the home screen was around before Apple's version. Apple simply patented it first. Please do not speak without knowing what you speak of.



     


    if what you say is really true,


     


    then apple's patent is invalid because they patented a published prior art.


     


    which Samsung and Google failed to prove.


     


    so please do not speak without knowing what you speak of.


     


     


    oh and btw, that's not the patent Samsung is found to be infringing on.

  • Reply 24 of 25
    e_veritase_veritas Posts: 248member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Loptimist View Post


     


    if what you say is really true,


     


    then apple's patent is invalid because they patented a published prior art.


     


    which Samsung and Google failed to prove.


     


    so please do not speak without knowing what you speak of.


     


     


    oh and btw, that's not the patent Samsung is found to be infringing on.



     


    If you clicked the first link in the article, you would find that Universal Search in indeed the patent in question here. The fact that a patent was issued for this is ABSURD, and regardless of your sentiments towards Apple, any support for this level of patent trolling is repulsive.


     


    U.S. Patent No. 8,086,604 for a "universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system" that was the basis of Friday's ruling..


     


    And for the record, Samsung hasn't been 'found' infringing any patent. That is not what a PI implies.


     


    "so please do not speak without knowing what you speak of"

  • Reply 25 of 25
    loptimistloptimist Posts: 113member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by e_veritas View Post


     


    If you clicked the first link in the article, you would find that Universal Search in indeed the patent in question here. The fact that a patent was issued for this is ABSURD, and regardless of your sentiments towards Apple, any support for this level of patent trolling is repulsive.


     


    U.S. Patent No. 8,086,604 for a "universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system" that was the basis of Friday's ruling..


     


    And for the record, Samsung hasn't been 'found' infringing any patent. That is not what a PI implies.


     


    "so please do not speak without knowing what you speak of"



     


    that guy said searching through apps from a search bar.


    how is this patent about that? retrieving information stored inside the device from the search bar is the key of this patent as you can see from the independent Claim 1.


     


    i don't like apple's patents either and you can find if you search my posts how i always bash apple off when it comes to,, everything nowadays.


     


    think harder before you write.

Sign In or Register to comment.