Time Magazine names Apple's iPhone 5 its 'Gadget of the Year'

13»

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 45
    olliewalliewhiskersolliewalliewhiskers Posts: 434member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by joelsalt View Post


    I was under the impression that Lytro camera lenses required a fair bit of depth to get the directional light information, and couldn't go into any of Apple's thin devices?





    yes, this is true. but apple seems to have a knack for shrinking things.

  • Reply 42 of 45
    dubstondubston Posts: 24member
    joelsalt wrote: »
    I was under the impression that Lytro camera lenses required a fair bit of depth to get the directional light information, and couldn't go into any of Apple's thin devices?
    I had a Minolta Dimage XT digital camera about 10 years ago. It had a folded lens design that allowed a 3x optical zoom to be contained within the body of the camera. I imagine a similar idea could be used in an iPhone.
  • Reply 43 of 45
    hentaiboyhentaiboy Posts: 1,252member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by AnalogJack View Post


    One person's 'scratch' is another person's 'patina'





    Does mean less money though when you flog it on eBay to fund your iPhone 5S...


     


    /s

  • Reply 44 of 45
    strobestrobe Posts: 369member


    People still read Time magazine?

  • Reply 45 of 45
    sr2012sr2012 Posts: 896member
    Not my gadget of the year, unfortunately.
Sign In or Register to comment.