New iTunes display is not an improvement

Jump to First Reply
sky kingsky king
Posted:
in iPod + iTunes + AppleTV edited January 2014


Does anyone other than me find the new display, search power, and sort capability in the new iTunes to be a negative?


 


Since I use iTunes mostly fro professional reasons, I don't browse, I organize all my audio files in iTunes.  It seems to me that the new but very cute displays are more for people who browse for music/videos than those of us who simply find it a great place to file all your professional audio files.


 


I'm suggesting that Apple simply add a CLASSIC display (which does not require new work..only applying old work to the new product).  That would make all of us happy.


 


Anyone else agree?  If so, how about joining me in emailing Apple to ask for a CLASSIC display.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 6
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    I'm not gonna touch your use of iTunes, of all things, for professional audio, but why not just turn on the sidebar?


     


    image

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 6
    jefffromwapakjefffromwapak Posts: 3member


    Thank you. Showing the sidebar seems to allow everything to work now.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 6
    tontontonton Posts: 14,067
    jefffromwapak wrote: »
    Thank you. Showing the sidebar seems to allow everything to work now.
    But it's still inferior to the nice tight list view we no longer have, having been replaced by a quadruple spaced list with artwork you can't turn off. Instead of eighty songs in a list we get twenty. Garbage.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 6
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Originally Posted by tonton View Post

    Garbage.


     


    Touchscreen.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 6
    tontontonton Posts: 14,067
    tallest skil wrote: »
    tonton wrote: »
    Garbage.

    Touchscreen.
    Agree. But we should have the option of tightening the list.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 6
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Originally Posted by tonton View Post

    Agree. But we should have the option of tightening the list.


     


    For now, you mean? I'll agree, semi-conditionally.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.