Try do. But when you are told that someone lied, every court will agree that at that point you are liable if you allow it to continue. Apple has rules about pulling apps for such claims and these writers either did not like this or felt it was too slow. The courts somewhat agreed and gave Apple a slap on the wrist for not having a faster process.
And if Apple had immediately pulled the apps, the developers would have sued and won for lack of due process. /s
Doing business in China is difficult, to say the least.
And if Apple had immediately pulled the apps, the developers would have sued and won for lack of due process. /s
Doing business in China is difficult, to say the least.
If there was no form proof that the apps were violating anything sure, they likely would. Which is why Apple has the process they have.
And these books don't exist on Android? Smells fishy...
I don't find any mention by the CWWCS that those "pirated works' are available on GooglePlay. There have been ongoing discussions between Google, Chinese authors and their associations, including the one mentioned in this article on the Google Books project. I've not seen where there's a final agreement yet.
Ms. Hohne said that more than 50 Chinese publishers had agreed to allow 60,000 books to be included in the company’s scanning program.
Zhang Hongbo, the secretary general of the China Written Works Copyright Society, which manages Chinese copyrights, hailed the letter and the apology. “It is a result that all Chinese copyright holders have been waiting for,” he said. “We look forward to Google’s deeper understanding of this issue.”
edit: FWIW there's apparently other yet-unsettled lawsuits between Chinese authors and Apple with the same general allegations. This article mentions several others:
Apple has to pay for this infringement of others' copyrights. The Chinese are just playing Apple's way of suing other people. In this case, Apple was found to be infringing on other people's creation.
Gee guys, let's sue the store instead of the pirates!
Some amazing logic going on there...
If you did not go through an Apple-curated AppStore, Apple wouldn't be at fault.
I feel 165k is not a hefty price to pay for the total control that Apple enjoys over what can run on the iPhone. No sex-related on the AppStore, because Apple considers its role to protect poor little JimmyJoe from himself. If Apple can prevent me from suffering terrible brain damage due to using a sex-related app, Apple definitely should prevent me from using a stolen app.
....and the Chinese pirates who stole the copyrighted information, used it to create an App, and submitted it to Apple?
I bet dollars to donuts that it's some cousin of the band in question.
I could see liability if the copyright holder caught the infraction and informed Apple and Apple did not comply. But really -- people can download this music off the web -- it's not like China doesn't turn a blind eye to copyright violations on the street (though they may have changed this).
It's a minor nuisance fee -- but I don't LIKE the approach of such a lawsuit. It would mean that if I put something on YouTube, that YouTube would be sued -- so that means THAT COMPANY gets more involved in the content, which ruins the experience.
Copyright violators should be responsible and THEN, only AFTER someone makes the abuse known should the CARRIER be liable -- not instead of or before.
If you did not go through an Apple-curated AppStore, Apple wouldn't be at fault.
I feel 165k is not a hefty price to pay for the total control that Apple enjoys over what can run on the iPhone. No sex-related on the AppStore, because Apple considers its role to protect poor little JimmyJoe from himself. If Apple can prevent me from suffering terrible brain damage due to using a sex-related app, Apple definitely should prevent me from using a stolen app.
Obviously, YOMV.
That's the thing... When a "curated" App Store keeps curating into the store sub-par apps, what's the point of curating anymore? Sure, it keeps out porn, but you don't need hardcore (pun unintended) curation to merely prevent 18+ material, you can keep things relatively open, and just keep some sort of monitoring and filtering by Apple. This is different from "closed" and "curated".
I'm not saying Apple doesn't have the best App Store in the world, I'm just saying the pressure to approve apps no doubt has impacted overall quality.
On Android it can be chaotic but Google's Play Store system does help good apps shine on their own merit with a lot of customer feedback and interaction. PicsArt for example, coming to iOS soon from Android. Aqua Mail, a very, very sophisticated mail app... not that "pretty" but extremely feature-rich. And of course all the major apps are cross-platform anyway.
So the question is... Why me curate? (with apologies to Mad magazine)
I bet dollars to donuts that it's some cousin of the band in question. I could see liability if the copyright holder caught the infraction and informed Apple and Apple did not comply. But really -- people can download this music off the web -- it's not like China doesn't turn a blind eye to copyright violations on the street (though they may have changed this).It's a minor nuisance fee -- but I don't LIKE the approach of such a lawsuit. It would mean that if I put something on YouTube, that YouTube would be sued -- so that means THAT COMPANY gets more involved in the content, which ruins the experience.Copyright violators should be responsible and THEN, only AFTER someone makes the abuse known should the CARRIER be liable -- not instead of or before.
This is what people don't get about Asia and keep calling me racist... The ethics and "social norms" are nothing like that which has been carefully cultured in the West over a millenium, through some horrible times, but coming out with the best quality of life humans have ~ever~ achieved thus far*. When it comes to Asia, let alone the Middle East, you are not going to see the same thing, not at least until 2035-2050 when Asia "evolves" like the West did from the Dark Ages, Renaissance, WW1, WW2, Cold War, and so on.
*Don't give me the "oh, everything is chilled out and happy in Asia"... Spend some time in KL, Jakarta, Manila, Shanghai, Bangkok... Fun if you're an expat but grow up even middle-class in those cities and get back to me.
That's the thing... When a "curated" App Store keeps curating into the store sub-par apps, what's the point of curating anymore? Sure, it keeps out porn, but you don't need hardcore (pun unintended) curation to merely prevent 18+ material, you can keep things relatively open, and just keep some sort of monitoring and filtering by Apple. This is different from "closed" and "curated".
I'm not saying Apple doesn't have the best App Store in the world, I'm just saying the pressure to approve apps no doubt has impacted overall quality.
On Android it can be chaotic but Google's Play Store system does help good apps shine on their own merit with a lot of customer feedback and interaction. PicsArt for example, coming to iOS soon from Android. Aqua Mail, a very, very sophisticated mail app... not that "pretty" but extremely feature-rich. And of course all the major apps are cross-platform anyway.
So the question is... Why me curate? (with apologies to Mad magazine)
It's simply a matter of what they're blocking.
First, Apple blocks unauthorized use of private APIs. That's very easy to automate and takes little manpower. By blocking private APIs, they help to ensure more robust apps.
Second, they block porn. While it's not easy to automate that, it's easy enough to verify if someone complains, so again, the manpower requirements are small.
Third, they scan for known malware.
Finally, they enforce companies following Apple policies. Again, not that time consuming to enforce - particularly after someone reports something.
Those things are designed to ensure safe, reliable apps that do not interfere with the rest of the system. It's all about user experience.
OTOH, policing content would be nearly impossible. I can't even imagine how large a team it would take to look at every app submitted and verify that nothing in that App was plagiarized. It would be a Herculean task - if it were possible at all. It would be impossible to guarantee that nothing in your App Store was ever plagiarized - just as it would be impossible for a book store owner to verify that none of the books on their shelves ever had any plagiarized material. It's just not possible.
What IS possible is for Apple to investigate complaints after they have been received and determine if something involving a very specific complaint is plagiarized - and they do that.
The questions in the China case are whether they do it fast enough or with too much work required on the part of the person whose work is being plagiarized and whether Chinese law allows someone to be held liable for an infringement that they didn't know about.
Comments
And if Apple had immediately pulled the apps, the developers would have sued and won for lack of due process. /s
Doing business in China is difficult, to say the least.
If there was no form proof that the apps were violating anything sure, they likely would. Which is why Apple has the process they have.
As for your last bit, not just in China.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Voyer
And these books don't exist on Android? Smells fishy...
I don't find any mention by the CWWCS that those "pirated works' are available on GooglePlay. There have been ongoing discussions between Google, Chinese authors and their associations, including the one mentioned in this article on the Google Books project. I've not seen where there's a final agreement yet.
Ms. Hohne said that more than 50 Chinese publishers had agreed to allow 60,000 books to be included in the company’s scanning program.
Zhang Hongbo, the secretary general of the China Written Works Copyright Society, which manages Chinese copyrights, hailed the letter and the apology. “It is a result that all Chinese copyright holders have been waiting for,” he said. “We look forward to Google’s deeper understanding of this issue.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/12/technology/companies/12google.html?ref=technology&_r=0
edit: FWIW there's apparently other yet-unsettled lawsuits between Chinese authors and Apple with the same general allegations. This article mentions several others:
http://shelf-life.ew.com/2012/03/19/apple-china-book-piracy-accusation/
Apple has to pay for this infringement of others' copyrights. The Chinese are just playing Apple's way of suing other people. In this case, Apple was found to be infringing on other people's creation.
Originally Posted by sr2012
Welcome to the Asian Century. Seriously, that's what all the Australian politicians are calling "our economic future".
You're over in that area; you're just paranoid about that sort of thing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9secondko
Gotta love Chinese courts.
Gee guys, let's sue the store instead of the pirates!
Some amazing logic going on there...
If you did not go through an Apple-curated AppStore, Apple wouldn't be at fault.
I feel 165k is not a hefty price to pay for the total control that Apple enjoys over what can run on the iPhone. No sex-related on the AppStore, because Apple considers its role to protect poor little JimmyJoe from himself. If Apple can prevent me from suffering terrible brain damage due to using a sex-related app, Apple definitely should prevent me from using a stolen app.
Obviously, YOMV.
Originally Posted by lightknight
If you did not go through an Apple-curated AppStore, Apple wouldn't be at fault.
They're not at fault NOW, by LAW.
....and the Chinese pirates who stole the copyrighted information, used it to create an App, and submitted it to Apple?
I bet dollars to donuts that it's some cousin of the band in question.
I could see liability if the copyright holder caught the infraction and informed Apple and Apple did not comply. But really -- people can download this music off the web -- it's not like China doesn't turn a blind eye to copyright violations on the street (though they may have changed this).
It's a minor nuisance fee -- but I don't LIKE the approach of such a lawsuit. It would mean that if I put something on YouTube, that YouTube would be sued -- so that means THAT COMPANY gets more involved in the content, which ruins the experience.
Copyright violators should be responsible and THEN, only AFTER someone makes the abuse known should the CARRIER be liable -- not instead of or before.
That's the thing... When a "curated" App Store keeps curating into the store sub-par apps, what's the point of curating anymore? Sure, it keeps out porn, but you don't need hardcore (pun unintended) curation to merely prevent 18+ material, you can keep things relatively open, and just keep some sort of monitoring and filtering by Apple. This is different from "closed" and "curated".
I'm not saying Apple doesn't have the best App Store in the world, I'm just saying the pressure to approve apps no doubt has impacted overall quality.
On Android it can be chaotic but Google's Play Store system does help good apps shine on their own merit with a lot of customer feedback and interaction. PicsArt for example, coming to iOS soon from Android. Aqua Mail, a very, very sophisticated mail app... not that "pretty" but extremely feature-rich. And of course all the major apps are cross-platform anyway.
So the question is... Why me curate? (with apologies to Mad magazine)
This is what people don't get about Asia and keep calling me racist... The ethics and "social norms" are nothing like that which has been carefully cultured in the West over a millenium, through some horrible times, but coming out with the best quality of life humans have ~ever~ achieved thus far*. When it comes to Asia, let alone the Middle East, you are not going to see the same thing, not at least until 2035-2050 when Asia "evolves" like the West did from the Dark Ages, Renaissance, WW1, WW2, Cold War, and so on.
*Don't give me the "oh, everything is chilled out and happy in Asia"... Spend some time in KL, Jakarta, Manila, Shanghai, Bangkok... Fun if you're an expat but grow up even middle-class in those cities and get back to me.
It's simply a matter of what they're blocking.
First, Apple blocks unauthorized use of private APIs. That's very easy to automate and takes little manpower. By blocking private APIs, they help to ensure more robust apps.
Second, they block porn. While it's not easy to automate that, it's easy enough to verify if someone complains, so again, the manpower requirements are small.
Third, they scan for known malware.
Finally, they enforce companies following Apple policies. Again, not that time consuming to enforce - particularly after someone reports something.
Those things are designed to ensure safe, reliable apps that do not interfere with the rest of the system. It's all about user experience.
OTOH, policing content would be nearly impossible. I can't even imagine how large a team it would take to look at every app submitted and verify that nothing in that App was plagiarized. It would be a Herculean task - if it were possible at all. It would be impossible to guarantee that nothing in your App Store was ever plagiarized - just as it would be impossible for a book store owner to verify that none of the books on their shelves ever had any plagiarized material. It's just not possible.
What IS possible is for Apple to investigate complaints after they have been received and determine if something involving a very specific complaint is plagiarized - and they do that.
The questions in the China case are whether they do it fast enough or with too much work required on the part of the person whose work is being plagiarized and whether Chinese law allows someone to be held liable for an infringement that they didn't know about.