If you're that interested browse my post history. It's in there, and answered more than once.
You remind me of my teenage son. He's often demanding, obnoxious, and/or disrespectful. It's just the age of course. He'll grow out of it one day and we'll talk about things as adults and equals. I'm looking forward to it.
Nope you have not told me why you are on this site. You can evade and insult to your heart's content buddy boy.
I don't believe you have children, I think you live with your mummy still.
Says the guy who only likes to post about the author of AI articles whom he despises. Yeah, no emotion there¡
I will say that it does seem you rarely do post about Apple as that would mean actually posting about the actual topic and not how much you hate Dilger.
Well caught out. I wonder if and how he will answer this fact. I am your witness as I also notice him insulting DED, no matter what the article is. And he/she trying to say they don't hate/despise Apple is a brazen lie. I can find untold numbers of their posts. They should be banned.
I don't hate that author, I just find him entertaining.
I'm flattered by your continued attention, but sorry to see you still don't have anything on-topic to post here...
What a lie. The vitriol that pours from your mouth is disgusting what you write about DED
Look at your user name, now do you get it ? Why did you choose it, except to be inflammatory.
No, that's not what it implies. It implies a right to privacy.
[SIZE=26px]On the topic of 'paid shills':[/SIZE]
Let's not anymore. It's certainly not impossible. They DO exist. We've even had some here in the past.
But I'm not sure I (at least) want to see it anymore unless the person making the accusation has proof. Even then, it should not be posted publicly; PM one of us mods with your evidence, outlined, and we'll take a look into it. These claims have started to ruin threads, and while I'm all for ruining a pro- or even neutral-Samsung thread, getting into the habit of thread ruining in general is probably a bad idea.
Quoted simply to have it show up again.
Rubbish.
You are simply taking his/her side because you seem to have an issue with me.
My question is a legitimate one because it will show their true colours.
Because they refuse to answer a simple question then one can only conclude they have something to hide, and its certainly not their privacy.
Now will I repeat the question to you because it seems to me that you are confused.
The question is: why are you on his site if you hate Apple.
In this very thread his/her hands were shaking with uncontrollable glee because they found an article from one of the tech pendants that reflects negatively on Apple due to the new samdung phone.
Not sure if it was in the actual AI article or whether they searched high and low for one, if so, this is even funnier.
So knowledge of IT, I.e. a career is irrelevant on a tech sight. Wow!
So what are you a hair dresser ?
A stupid inference results in me totally ignoring the rest of your reply.
So tell me why are you on this site again?
Already answered both your questions in my previous post. A failure on your part to read and comprehend my posts does not constitute a failure on my part.
I don't have to justify why I post on this site or any other forum. I just do. I'm not hiding anything - if you don't like that, tough.
The irony of it all is that the nature of your posts do more to drag down the standard of this forum than all of the posters you call trolls/shills/liars.
Anyway, I'm bowing out of this discussion purely because there's nothing more to discuss with the likes of you.
You have trouble navigating in a simple forum and yet have the nerve to ask "what more proof" is needed?
is there any logical connection between them?
That was my first post on AI...of course there's nothing to learn there... i just clicked reply and typed my message..but it is showing it as separate message.
As I mentioned before the s4 isnt very user friendly when you have a bunch of software features that will confuse users. I could see this phone selling well but I could see a lot of returns. People want a phone that's easy to use not hard to use.
Oh, they'll answer that, in so many words. I've seen it before. Gotta coax it out of them.
It doesn't even require that much coaxing. There's just no need to repeat it over and over, particularly to disrespectful and insulting newbees unwilling to look for themselves, or at least politely ask if they don't know how to.
FWIW I actually found AI during a search on on Apple product I gave to my son a couple years back. There was an ill-fated Microsoft product involved too which I deeply regret, but that's even another story. It lead to RoughlyDrafted and from exchanges with Mr. Dilger brought me here. You can thank him if you wish. There's the whole sordid affair exposed.
But your answer was largely non-responsive:
"None of the above. I visit here for much the same reason as you. I'm truly intrigued by Apple and it business, the direction mobile technology is taking us, how the other tech players fit the picture, and to enjoy an exchange of ideas and outlooks with other respectful and thoughtful forum members."
That doesn't explain why you spend so much time as an obvious Google and Android shill.
"None of the above. I visit here for much the same reason as you. I'm truly intrigued by Apple and it business, the direction mobile technology is taking us, how the other tech players fit the picture, and to enjoy an exchange of ideas and outlooks with other respectful and thoughtful forum members."
That doesn't explain why you spend so much time as an obvious Google and Android shill.
Still with the silly shill claims eh JR? You do this just about every time you're on the losing side of a discussion between us. Sometimes you add bonus name-calling, for dramatic effect I suppose.
Either you didn't read TS's post or you choose to ignore it.
Man leaves laptop behind in taxi.
Man gmail a friends this fact.
Man gets ads targeting him with purchase a laptop.
Man gets angry.
Man gmail a friend that he will get a lawyer because google is reading his private emails.
Man now gets targeted with ads for lawyers.
I wrote it in a simple fashion so you can understand.
This is fact, do not ask for citations, you get none for me as you are obnoxious
Now do you understand why people are/should be concerned about privacy when using google stuff
First of all, this only proves you don't understand how ads work. Second of all, you also claimed many things (chemist or IT?) before and are running low on credibility.
If you're that interested browse my post history. It's in there, and answered more than once.
You remind me of my teenage son. He's often demanding, obnoxious, and/or disrespectful. It's just the age of course. He'll grow out of it one day and we'll talk about things as adults and equals. I'm looking forward to it.
I've realized this evening it's not helpful trying to engage him as no good will come from it. It will only lead to more problems. Better to just let him be.
I've realized this evening it's not helpful trying to engage him as no good will come from it. It will only lead to more problems. Better to just let him be.
Seriously
Are you sure? Well, you know your son better than I do.
Comments
I can show you hundreds of your posts. Are you serious?
I don't believe you have children, I think you live with your mummy still.
Look at your user name, now do you get it ? Why did you choose it, except to be inflammatory.
I bet I don't get an apology from the troll.
You are simply taking his/her side because you seem to have an issue with me.
My question is a legitimate one because it will show their true colours.
Because they refuse to answer a simple question then one can only conclude they have something to hide, and its certainly not their privacy.
Now will I repeat the question to you because it seems to me that you are confused.
The question is: why are you on his site if you hate Apple.
In this very thread his/her hands were shaking with uncontrollable glee because they found an article from one of the tech pendants that reflects negatively on Apple due to the new samdung phone.
Not sure if it was in the actual AI article or whether they searched high and low for one, if so, this is even funnier.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hfts
Hi mr. comedy relief.
So knowledge of IT, I.e. a career is irrelevant on a tech sight. Wow!
So what are you a hair dresser ?
A stupid inference results in me totally ignoring the rest of your reply.
So tell me why are you on this site again?
Already answered both your questions in my previous post. A failure on your part to read and comprehend my posts does not constitute a failure on my part.
I don't have to justify why I post on this site or any other forum. I just do. I'm not hiding anything - if you don't like that, tough.
The irony of it all is that the nature of your posts do more to drag down the standard of this forum than all of the posters you call trolls/shills/liars.
Anyway, I'm bowing out of this discussion purely because there's nothing more to discuss with the likes of you.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by ankleskater
You have trouble navigating in a simple forum and yet have the nerve to ask "what more proof" is needed?
is there any logical connection between them?
That was my first post on AI...of course there's nothing to learn there... i just clicked reply and typed my message..but it is showing it as separate message.
stock was up because the street is not impressed
Originally Posted by hfts
You are simply taking his/her side because you seem to have an issue with me.
I think you and geekdad will get along just fine.
My question is a legitimate one because it will show their true colours.
And if you have proof of that, I'd be glad to expose true colors in the gaudiest fashion. But without it, it just craps on threads.
Because they refuse to answer a simple question then one can only conclude they have something to hide
Your conclusion is fallacious. That's not how privacy works.
and its certainly not their privacy.
Their job isn't private information? Google will love that.
The question is: why are you on his site if you hate Apple.
Oh, they'll answer that, in so many words. I've seen it before. Gotta coax it out of them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
Oh, they'll answer that, in so many words. I've seen it before. Gotta coax it out of them.
It doesn't even require that much coaxing. There's just no need to repeat it over and over, particularly to disrespectful and insulting newbees unwilling to look for themselves, or at least politely ask if they don't know how to.
http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/156362/apple-maps-directions-beat-google-maps-waze-in-pundits-head-to-head-test/80#post_2290306
FWIW I actually found AI during a search on on Apple product I gave to my son a couple years back. There was an ill-fated Microsoft product involved too which I deeply regret, but that's even another story. It lead to RoughlyDrafted and from exchanges with Mr. Dilger brought me here. You can thank him if you wish. There's the whole sordid affair exposed.
But your answer was largely non-responsive:
"None of the above. I visit here for much the same reason as you. I'm truly intrigued by Apple and it business, the direction mobile technology is taking us, how the other tech players fit the picture, and to enjoy an exchange of ideas and outlooks with other respectful and thoughtful forum members."
That doesn't explain why you spend so much time as an obvious Google and Android shill.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta
But your answer was largely non-responsive:
"None of the above. I visit here for much the same reason as you. I'm truly intrigued by Apple and it business, the direction mobile technology is taking us, how the other tech players fit the picture, and to enjoy an exchange of ideas and outlooks with other respectful and thoughtful forum members."
That doesn't explain why you spend so much time as an obvious Google and Android shill.
Still with the silly shill claims eh JR? You do this just about every time you're on the losing side of a discussion between us. Sometimes you add bonus name-calling, for dramatic effect I suppose.
Either you didn't read TS's post or you choose to ignore it.
http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/156483/samsung-challenges-apples-iphone-with-new-galaxy-s4/240#post_2294617
First of all, this only proves you don't understand how ads work. Second of all, you also claimed many things (chemist or IT?) before and are running low on credibility.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ankleskater
Unlike your son, hfts will not change.
I've realized this evening it's not helpful trying to engage him as no good will come from it. It will only lead to more problems. Better to just let him be.
Seriously
Are you sure? Well, you know your son better than I do.