It's time for Apple to license OS X to other manufacturers

Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware edited January 2014
Windows 8 is failing and PC sales are collapsing. It's time for Apple to license OS X to other manufacturers to help put Microsoft out of their misery. Time for Tim (HP) Cook to 'think different', and since OS X machines are such a small part of Apples profits, I say why not. When everyone wants to follow a vertical structure that's when you go horizontal.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 18
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Abject nonsense.

  • Reply 2 of 18
    When Tallest hates something, I know it's a good idea.
  • Reply 3 of 18
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Originally Posted by Commodification View Post

    When Tallest hates something, I know it's a good idea.


     


    It has been the worst idea posed since the creation of Apple, and it will continue to be the worst idea posted until the closing of Apple. 


     


    Why do we need to go over 30 years of history? Do you know what Apple is? They are the opposite of "license OS X". 

  • Reply 4 of 18


    the best idea is to acquire microsoft. and then everyone will have to use OS X. make it a whole apple.


     


    FFS, the apple logo is not even whole. with the buying of microsoft….we can finally have the apple logo as a whole apple logo.


     


    microsoft + OS X =  a big big apple.


     


    PS: linux can be added for sweet taste.


     


    band camp bunny.

  • Reply 5 of 18
    Ha! They should license it to Microsoft. It would be the best OS they ever had.
  • Reply 6 of 18
    wizard69wizard69 Posts: 13,377member
    You pose an interesting suggestion, but I think the best way for Apple to bury MS is to rationalize their desktop line up.

    I was just at a seminar that highlighted CNC software. One vendor mentioned that they where going multi platform. The problem is that MS is going in a direction that will make supporting their CNC software very difficult. The one thing the like about Apple is that the hardware/software is a known quantity. So part of the reason for doing this about face would be to lower support costs and increase software reliability. If Apple licensed the software that is Mac OS/X that quality would go away.

    What is interesting is that Apple is making inroads in these sorts of markets by staying the course. Now I'm going to probably regret this, but if Apple where to offer up an XMac, that is a computer that appeals to mainstream business, they could actually see a huge upside in Mac sales. Mostly we are talking about customers defecting from MS due to quality issues who are now on the MS hook due to the lack of decent hardware from Apple.
  • Reply 7 of 18
    MarvinMarvin Posts: 15,322moderator
    Ha! They should license it to Microsoft. It would be the best OS they ever had.

    They'd have to lock down the OS with activation codes as well as provide support for hundreds of millions of people with all sorts of hardware configurations. Right now, Apple makes about $2-3b net profit per quarter from the Mac line.

    There are 350m PCs sold per year so if they sold OS X at $100 and managed to convince 100m people to take it, they'd make around $10b.

    I suspect people would still buy Apple hardware because it's much better quality and would give a better experience using the OS.

    When the OS licensing failed before, they didn't have significantly better hardware and probably didn't lock the OS down well enough. It could be an easy way to significantly boost profits but it also means they would be creating a more competitive environment for their hardware line. Once they decided to do it, it would be very hard to turn back. I suspect it would also lead to an increase in malware attacks as OS X isn't as locked down as iOS.

    I don't think it's something they'd want to do. It's not all about making more money. The people at Apple have to feel happy about what they do or they won't do it well. Do they want people hauling their crappy plastic PCs into the Apple Stores for support for their $100 OS? Not likely. The potential profit has to be weighed against the cost and the emotional cost of supporting OS X on poor quality hardware is too much of a price to pay.
  • Reply 8 of 18
    mr. memr. me Posts: 3,221member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Marvin View Post





    ... they didn't have significantly better hardware and probably didn't lock the OS down well enough. ...


     


    This is simply not true. Mac clones were not clones in the true sense of the word. This was before the New World ROM in software. Back then, the thing that made a Mac a Mac was the Toolbox ROM in firmware. Every Mac "clone" featured a genuine Toolbox ROM supplied by Apple. In this sense, Mac clones were really genuine Macs in different cases.

  • Reply 9 of 18
    piotpiot Posts: 1,346member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Commodification View Post



    Windows 8 is failing and PC sales are collapsing. It's time for Apple to license OS X to other manufacturers......


     


    Brilliant idea! Let's wait until PC sales collapse.... and then capture the PC OS market.


     


    Suggest you wait a couple of days, when Microsoft will release their latest financial results.

  • Reply 10 of 18
    I'm driving over to Apple right now to make myself CEO and send Tim Cook back to the shipping/receiving logistics department. I'll make Apple spend all of it's cash on buying Microsoft and switching everything over to OSX and fire Steve Balmer and hire back Scott Forstall to make all the wood surfaces and leather chairs in the offices look like something that was made in Minecraft (to create balance in the force).
  • Reply 11 of 18
    mactacmactac Posts: 316member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


     

     Do you know what Apple is?


     


    It's the company that won't build a mid sized mid range Mac. Perhaps Apple should license OSX to one manufacturer that contracts to only offer a mid size mid range desktop computer. It wouldn't really be competing with any of Apple's models.

  • Reply 12 of 18
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Originally Posted by MacTac View Post

    It's the company that won't build a mid sized mid range Mac.




    Or you could just buy something from someone else.

  • Reply 13 of 18


    Apple needs me to fix their sinking ship.

  • Reply 14 of 18
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Originally Posted by Commodification View Post

    Apple needs me to fix their sinking ship.


     


    Go away.

  • Reply 15 of 18

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


     


    Go away.





    I love you too.

  • Reply 16 of 18
    marvfoxmarvfox Posts: 2,275member


    Why are you arrogant with your answers sometimes?

     

  • Reply 17 of 18
    mactacmactac Posts: 316member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post




    Or you could just buy something from someone else.





    I admit that I have been tempted. But I prefer my OS to be from Apple.

  • Reply 18 of 18
    relicrelic Posts: 4,735member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by MacTac View Post




    I admit that I have been tempted. But I prefer my OS to be from Apple.



    You can always build a Hackintosh, I recently installed OSX on a Thinkpad X230T for a work colleague, pretty cool having a touch screen. Everything seems to be running, I'll know more next week when he had time to play with it over the weekend.

Sign In or Register to comment.