Apple job listings point to new iWork for iOS and OS X with HiDPI graphics

2

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 54
    wizard69wizard69 Posts: 13,377member
    The trick to iWork is to include all the piddling little features that no one actually cares about (for the 1/1000th of 1/1000th of a percent that uses them) while retaining the simplicity of the UI and operation for everyone else.

    That's hard (and pretty pointless), so Apple has been putting it off.
    While you have a valid point about the piddling features that many out in left field want, there are many many short comings with the iWork suites. Number one is the asinine creation of iOS iWork specific files which blows the whole point of iCloud out of the water. This to me is a major defect in the software.

    Other things include modern scripting support within the apps. I'm talking both iOS and Mac OS with a special focus on Numbers. I might choke a bit on it but even a JavaScript based solution within Numbers would go a long ways to making it a Pro app. Import and export still sucks in Numbers and frankly this is an embarrassment as open source spread sheets do a better job. It isn't like an Excel file is a total mystery these days.

    I'm moaning about Numbers here because it is the one App out of the iWork suite that I use the most and thus is the app I see the most short comings in. Most of the other apps get used for viewers and modest uses as creation tools. I'm certain if I was a more demanding user I'd see serious shortcomings in the rest of the suite.

    So I don't buy your point of view, in fact I think it is garbage, there are enough short comings in iWork that even casual users can run into problems. They may not be a problem for you but some such as the incompatibility if files between iOS and Mac OS are very much show stoppers for some and a huge frustration for others.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 54
    wizard69wizard69 Posts: 13,377member
    [Quote]
    Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum

    Add to that, feature parity between iOS and OSX versions.

    That bears repeating.
    [/Quote]
    So I will repeat it yet again! Feature parity should include file parity too.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 54
    sennensennen Posts: 1,472member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by ChristophB View Post




     

    That bears repeating.


     


    image

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 54
    gtrgtr Posts: 3,231member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by dysamoria View Post



    Documents could have actual password protection. On iOS devices especially.


     


    Yes, it's always nice when you open the password-protected document created on your Mac on an iOS device and it closes and saves it to iCloud and strips out the password-protection.


     


    I'd like to see that addressed.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 54
    kkerstkkerst Posts: 330member
    Seriously? iWork is majorly lacking features and is far from perfect. For starters, there is no way to do add references.

    Or maybe you had your sarcasm button on, my radar never works for that.

    Oh, there's the /s....nevamind
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 54
    charlitunacharlituna Posts: 7,217member
    andysol wrote: »
    Why even do anything else to iWork? It's already 100% perfect. Right tallest? /s

    To some degree this is true. Numbers could use some work for sure. And it would be nice to see them change up the pop up inspector etc with the sliding panel like iPhoto has.

    But aside from stability tweaks there's little else they can really do with the other programs.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 54
    jollypauljollypaul Posts: 328member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Durandal1707 View Post


    Actually, it means that the next update will happen in the 24th century.



     


    This makes me wish someone in authority had the guts to stencil NCC-1701 on the roof of the new headquarters.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 54
    charlitunacharlituna Posts: 7,217member
    The trick to iWork is to include all the piddling little features that no one actually cares about (for the 1/1000th of 1/1000th of a percent that uses them) while retaining the simplicity of the UI and operation for everyone else.

    That's hard (and pretty pointless), so Apple has been putting it off.

    Well there is a middle ground. One that has been supported in other programs and could work quite well with both versions of the iWork apps. Plug in support. They figured out a way to do it with GarageBand for iOS and Audiobus so I suspect they could sort it out for the iWork apps and even iPhoto and iMovie (both versions).

    Then like with the Pro apps they can focus on the consumer/prosumer level but the more advanced folks can add it what they feel is needed
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 29 of 54
    richard getzrichard getz Posts: 1,142member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


     


    The trick to iWork is to include all the piddling little features that no one actually cares about (for the 1/1000th of 1/1000th of a percent that uses them) while retaining the simplicity of the UI and operation for everyone else.


     


    That's hard (and pretty pointless), so Apple has been putting it off.



     


    But there are some basic items they can update. 


     



    • Fill box retaining the last fill color so you can select a cell and fill without finding the color again


    • When a cell text color is changed and you select the text color option, the color should be indicated (like it is with the fill) so you know what color you used. 


    • How can I get the RGB of the text color or fill


    • Copy / Past formula only? 


     


    Just some annoying everyday issues. I don't use Keynote at all and seldom Pages. I would put up with all of this if Mail (not part of iWork) would have the task/flag for followup functions like Outlook. 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 30 of 54
    richard getzrichard getz Posts: 1,142member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by kkerst View Post



    Seriously? iWork is majorly lacking features and is far from perfect. For starters, there is no way to do add references.



    Or maybe you had your sarcasm button on, my radar never works for that.



    Oh, there's the /s....nevamind


     


    What are your thoughts for adding features? 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 54
    kkerstkkerst Posts: 330member
    There is no way to add global cross references. This would be similar to what can be accomplished in FrameMaker and Word for years now. There is also no way to continue hierarchical headings - they always start over each time.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 32 of 54
    kevtkevt Posts: 195member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by wizard69 View Post







    So I will repeat it yet again! Feature parity should include file parity too.


     


    File parity is the biggie - much more important than full feature parity. Even if some features would overcomplicate the iOS version, that would not necessarily preclude sharing a common file format. Sync via iCloud would be improved immensely from the mess it is today.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 54
    gtrgtr Posts: 3,231member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by kevt View Post


    File parity is the biggie - much more important than full feature parity.



     


    I'd settle for font parity.


     


    image

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 34 of 54
    dick applebaumdick applebaum Posts: 12,527member
    wizard69 wrote: »
    Originally Posted by Dick Applebaum

    Add to that, feature parity between iOS and OSX versions.

    That bears repeating.
    So I will repeat it yet again! Feature parity should include file parity too.

    Exactly!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 35 of 54
    suddenly newtonsuddenly newton Posts: 13,819member
    christophb wrote: »
    That bears repeating.

    Hence, all the Duplicate posts.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 36 of 54
    suddenly newtonsuddenly newton Posts: 13,819member
    iWorks is nowhere near perfect.

    Not enough piddling.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 37 of 54
    quadra 610quadra 610 Posts: 6,759member
    Would be nice if Pages handled fonts and special characters like Mellel.

    Mellel, however, is a Word Processor purist's Word Processor. Nothing comes close. Pages is a different animal and is meant to be what it is.

    Still, it would be nice to see a few of Mellel's tricks show up in Pages.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 38 of 54
    quadra 610quadra 610 Posts: 6,759member
    Besides, I do the bulk of my writing in minimalist writing apps these days, and important the content into Mellel (or Pages) if necessary.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 39 of 54
    mdriftmeyermdriftmeyer Posts: 7,503member


    Wake me up when Apple opens up a 3rd party API to leverage R, Matlab, Octave, Maxima, Maple to name 5 major Numercial Analysis and much more quality products within Numbers.


     


    Do the same with creating an API to leverage the power of TeXLive in container object which offloads all the content in this object to run a subprocess with TeXLive for Pages.app and then extend the power of Keynote to create live/dynamic and active presentations before declaring iWorks is really a player.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 40 of 54
    They're hiring now? We'll never see it. Nor will we want to. QA should come in at the start, and be really really smart. Adverbially smart, dudes!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.