10M Samsung flagship phones in 28 days a 'record,' 5M iPhone 5 in 3 days 'disappointing'

2456711

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 213
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    solipsismx wrote: »
    I find baseball to be so hit or miss.

    Much more misses than hits. Very Samsungesque :lol:
  • Reply 22 of 213
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    Actually that's pretty pathetic for the new flagship model of what is supposedly the world-beating company in smartphones.

    Glad to see that you agree it's cheap plastic......

    They're definitely beating the snot out of the other Android manufacturers. I'm glad you're glad.
  • Reply 23 of 213
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    It never ceases to amaze -- and impress -- me that you take the time to talk logic to trolls and fools....

    He's like the Jesus of AI, trying to save lost souls... I mean trolls.
  • Reply 24 of 213
    hydrhydr Posts: 146member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post



    Just waiting for the usual suspects to show up telling us Apple's 5M ws a shipped number too and Samsung wouldn't ship 10M if they didn't expect to sell them.


     


    That is actually how Apple reports its numbers. Although the channel inventory for Apple for companies like Wal-Mart, BestBuy etc is considerably lower. Last quarter I believe the ratio was 70/30 of the reported numbers. So Apple does indeed report shipped and not sold products, but they are clearing out inventory a whole lot faster than the likes of Samsung & Co.

  • Reply 25 of 213
    jmbarryjmbarry Posts: 8member
    This is the same group of reporters who ignore the FACT that in the USA Apple sold well over half of the smartphones at the dominant carriers (AT&T, Verizon & Sprint) last quarter. I see boards all over touting Android has 80% of the market but in the USA they have less than 40% in the past quarter. The articles from Jay Yarrow are usually pointed in that direction. I have no idea how the facts are outside the US, as carriers there do not report actual sales. I guess facts are just not part of reporting anymore....
  • Reply 26 of 213
    charlitunacharlituna Posts: 7,217member
    drblank wrote: »
    Apple only HAD 5 Million units to actually sell. If they had more, they would have sold more. Plus, Apple didn't roll out the iPhone in all of their markets in the first day. Apple has only 200 carriers to sell through and Samsung has 800. With all due respect, Apple has a smaller market to market through with limited mfg capabilities.

    And given all of that, why did it take 25 more days for Ssmsung to double the iPhone launch numbers. They should have been in a position to do it within the first week if not less.
  • Reply 27 of 213
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    It never ceases to amaze -- and impress -- me that you take the time to talk logic to trolls and fools....

    I'm hoping to get a Nobel Peace Prize for my contributions to AI.
  • Reply 28 of 213
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    jmbarry wrote: »
    This is the same group of reporters who ignore the FACT that in the USA Apple sold well over half of the smartphones at the dominant carriers (AT&T, Verizon & Sprint) last quarter. I see boards all over touting Android has 80% of the market but in the USA they have less than 40% in the past quarter. The articles from Jay Yarrow are usually pointed in that direction. I have no idea how the facts are outside the US, as carriers there do not report actual sales. I guess facts are just not part of reporting anymore....

    Newsflash: the rest of the world is bigger than the US.
  • Reply 29 of 213
    asciiascii Posts: 5,936member


    That reporter "Jay Yarow" obviously has something against Apple. I don't mind actually, media outlets are openly biased. At least you know before you start reading which way they lean. It's ones that pretend to be objective and *then* slant the news that I don't like.

  • Reply 30 of 213
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    charlituna wrote: »
    And given all of that, why did it take 25 more days for Ssmsung to double the iPhone launch numbers. They should have been in a position to do it within the first week if not less.

    Doesn't matter, they just have to outsell everyone else and that margin is much bigger than Apple's margin over Samsung.
  • Reply 31 of 213
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    hydr wrote: »
    That is actually how Apple reports its numbers. Although the channel inventory for Apple for companies like Wal-Mart, BestBuy etc is considerably lower. Last quarter I believe the ratio was 70/30 of the reported numbers. So Apple does indeed report shipped and not sold products, but they are clearing out inventory a whole lot faster than the likes of Samsung & Co.
    Hmm...just curious which Apple stores or re-sellers had the iPhone 5 in stock on Saturday or Sunday of the weekend it came out. All I remember is it being sold out everywhere. I guess I'd be curious to know how much of the 5M in 3 days was channel inventory. My guess is none.

    Today I can go to AT&T, Sprint and Best Buy and they all have the S4 in stock and available for delivery (or in store pickup).
  • Reply 32 of 213
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    rogifan wrote: »
    Hmm...just curious which Apple stores or re-sellers had the iPhone 5 in stock on Saturday or Sunday of the weekend it came out. All I remember is it being sold out everywhere. I guess I'd be curious to know how much of the 5M in 3 days was channel inventory. My guess is none.

    Today I can go to AT&T, Sprint and Best Buy and they all have the S4 in stock and available for delivery (or in store pickup).

    How many people went through 2-3 iPhones 5 before settling on one because of scuffs?
  • Reply 33 of 213
    hill60hill60 Posts: 6,992member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by AZREOSpecialist View Post



    Analysts are crazy about Samsung because Samsung can only go up... 


     


    ...If all we see by then are recycled designs and nothing really new...


     


    Samsung is where Nokia was.


     


    Samsung will be in trouble, recycled designs playing catch up with HTC and Sony.


     


     


  • Reply 34 of 213
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    dasanman69 wrote: »
    How many people went through 2-3 iPhones 5 before settling on one because of scuffs?
    So the 5M figure included returned devices? Or stores were out of stock because Apple couldn't make them fast enough? Again, my question is what % of the 5M in 3 days Apple reported was channel inventory compared to the same for Samsung's 10M in 30 days.
  • Reply 35 of 213
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    hill60 wrote: »
    I've never used a Samsung phone. What is the hardware button for? With such a small bezel that button really seems out of place.

    Also I love that the iPhone doesn't have any logo or branding on the front of the phone (especially no AT&T or Verizon logo!). I'd hate having to see the word Samsung every time I stared at my screen.
  • Reply 36 of 213
    heliahelia Posts: 170member


    You all are missing a point which important it seems to me


     


     


     


    Quote:


    three chief executives told reporters that the company had shipped 6 million units to carriers globally and expected shipments to hit 10 million next week



     


    It clearly says they shipped only 6 millions so far, 2 millions a week. and they expect to ship (not sell) 4 millions more in next week!


     


    Is it me or do you have problems grasping the idea of how can it sell 4 mil in a week while it hasnt sold more than 2 per week?!


     


    So samsung is just expecting (they wish!) to sell 10 milllions a month, not that the thing has happened that you argue about it image


  • Reply 37 of 213
    loptimistloptimist Posts: 113member


    I think the market is fairly concentrated these days even more than when iPhone 5 came out.


    Be it iPhone 5/4s, Galaxy S3/Note 2, ONE, Nexus 4, Xperia Z, Optimus G Pro, all of them seem to perform well for most of common tasks...


    Frankly, probably each has more cpu/gpu power than those smartphone sized/compatible apps may demand.


     


    I think it is quite impressive that Galaxy S4 can still fight well against other competitors even when many consumers find no need to switch,


    and am wondering how many people would stick to iPhone for its next cycle soon.


     


    iOS 7 better be good this time.

  • Reply 38 of 213
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    loptimist wrote: »
    iOS 7 better be good this time.

    This implies that iOS 6 isn't good and/or that the Galaxy S4 has somehow done something that makes iOS 6 look bad. What in the S4 is something that is going to attract iPhone users away from the iPhone?
  • Reply 39 of 213
    hill60hill60 Posts: 6,992member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post



    I'd hate having to see the word Samsung every time I stared at my screen.


     


    Why not, it may remind you of your washing machine!


     


    /s

  • Reply 40 of 213
    loptimistloptimist Posts: 113member


    I am not talking specifically about Galaxy S4/TouchWiz filled Android (although I find some of their features to be attractive: eye-tracking(pause/play) / hand/hover gesture when my hands are wet / quick-pick / built in camera software).  I am not saying I will be using them all the time, but choices/options are good when the right moment comes.  Just like having flash enabled by default may not be good but having an option/ability to use it when I actually need it would be appreciated.


     


    But, I am talking more in general about the latest version of Android.  


    To me at least it has been better in many ways than iOS 6.  I think it may be too subjective so I will restrain myself from rambling further.  You may agree or disagree, I don't really care.  And you shouldn't care about my subjective opinion either.

Sign In or Register to comment.