G02Mac has these details...
<a href="http://www.go2mac.com/story.lasso?newsID=8922" target="_blank">http://www.go2mac.com/story.lasso?newsID=8922</a>
The most interesting bit is the graphics hardware, other than that it looks like the usual speedbumped Quicksilver stuff.
The most interesting bit is the graphics hardware, other than that it looks like the usual speedbumped Quicksilver stuff.
Comments
[ 01-24-2002: Message edited by: fobie ]</p>
Thats a lowend radeon. I think a GeForce 2 MX is a bit more powerful.
The HD is smaller and no SD. WTF is that?
The GeForce 4 in the other models is really sweet, if true.
This is a joke, right?
danho
As in $500 less?
MSKR
That's on February, 5th I think...
[ 01-24-2002: Message edited by: timortis ]</p>
<strong>Did it ever occur to anyone thatthe low end Power Mac might be less than the upper end iMac?
As in $500 less?
MSKR</strong><hr></blockquote>
Ok, I forgot that the imac would have the superdrive and the tower would have only CD-RW. If one could buy such a tower (with LCD) for the same price (perhaps cheaper), and trade off design, superdrive and larger HD for faster HD, CD-RW, better graphics card, and expandability, I suspect the lower end tower would cannibilize (sp?) imac sales.
We shall see.
Geforce 3 has gotten very fast through the use of some very expensive memory, bus, and core speed bumps. Geforce 4 was designed to accomplish the same/better performance with better design (and thus be cheaper to produce)
This is only being discussed in a thread that is now 3 pages long <a href="http://forums.appleinsider.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=001098" target="_blank">here.</a>
But all of this should be old news to you since you are certain that the G5 is coming this week. <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />