Comcast to purchase Time Warner Cable, future Apple TV partnership uncertain

245

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 97
    Lmmfao! On the AI app on this thread cable/dish is using appleADs to advertise.
    [IMG]http://forums.appleinsider.com/content/type/61/id/38377/width/200/height/400[/IMG]
  • Reply 22 of 97
    Great. Comcast owns NBC and now Time Warner.

    I guess that simplifies things for the DoJ when in ten years they sue Apple for monopolistic partnering with the only telecom in existence. Never mind that the only telecom in existence is inherently monopolistic; that doesn’t matter. What matters is that Apple is doing something that lets us take money from them.

    Unfortunately the government granted them the monopoly. Very hypocritical to sue a company for the very same thing you grant to another.
  • Reply 23 of 97
    Netflix has House of Cards. Apple should dangle a bunch of money to the top show producers and just bypass these giant middlemen.

    Great show, I think Robin Wright has gotten sexier with age. You're absolutely right though, there are probably dozens of great shows just waiting to be picked up by someone.
  • Reply 24 of 97
    Comcast is not really known as an innovator... Do they have a fiber transition plan ala FIOS or Google Fiber?
  • Reply 25 of 97
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by gwmac View Post

     

     Do you live on this forum? () How you managed to quote me in the short time prior to me deleting it says quite a bit. 


     

    He's sporting Google Glass! <img class=" src="http://forums-files.appleinsider.com/images/smilies//lol.gif" /> 

  • Reply 26 of 97
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    Netflix has House of Cards. Apple should dangle a bunch of money to the top show producers and just bypass these giant middlemen.
    Comcast owns NBC Universal. If the content owners were willing to play ball we'd have an updated Apple TV already. WSJ is reporting that Apple wanted to do an ala carte service where people could get programming via Apple TV and "cut the cord", but he media companies consistently pulled out of negotiations. The TV industry isn't in the same place the music industry was. They don't have to play ball with Apple.

    http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304703804579379611592863936?mg=reno64-wsj&amp;url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304703804579379611592863936.html
  • Reply 27 of 97
    Apple can easily buy Comcast. Hostile takeover all stock
  • Reply 28 of 97
    Originally Posted by Dickprinter View Post

    He's sporting Google Glass! <img class=" src="http://forums-files.appleinsider.com/images/smilies//lol.gif" /> 




    “Glass, tell me when gwmac posts.”



    “Glass, shatter.”

  • Reply 29 of 97
    rogifan wrote: »
    If the content owners were willing to play ball we'd have an updated Apple TV already.

    ... an ala carte service where people could get programming via Apple TV and "cut the cord"...

    The TV industry isn't in the same place the music industry was.

    On the first two points: absolutely correct.

    On the last? The music industry was pushed by rampant illegal downloads that destroyed CD sales, and with no online alternative, needed iTMS desperately to rescue them from file sharing (eg. Napster).

    TV shows have gone in a similar direction, with quality programming torrented and streamed increasingly, but the cable companies money, advertising and better general knowledge of the internet have slowed progress in this area.

    So far they have made the mistake of thinking their content is still being viewed via channels on cable/satellite TV boxes out of necessity rather than convenience.

    Even if Apple are forced to start their subscription prices high, any agreements that can be made to make some money back from those that stream will become increasingly attractive, especially if linked to notions of in-series purchases of additional plays or DVD-like special features.

    For the most part, this fits extremely well (anecdotally) with a target audience currently mistakenly considered as criminal with no want to provide monetary reward for entertainment. The market is definitely ripe.
  • Reply 30 of 97
    asdasdasdasd Posts: 5,686member
    So do none of the content producers or US networks have apps?

    As I said I could use my iPad right now to bypass TV or airplay all TV because everything I get on my TV is available in Apps. Is that not the case in the US?
  • Reply 31 of 97
    OK. Comcast bought Time Warner for $45.2 Billion.
    It would appear that Comcast will now have 2 sets of content contracts.
    Apple may have made a deal for the TimeWarner contracts.

    This may explain the delay in availability of the content to allow Comcast to close the deal and integrate TWC into its set of contracts.

    If the contracts are not transferrable then they can not be transferred to Comcast which does not need them anyway. If the contracts are transferrable them perhaps Apple could buy them outright and be done.

    Time will tell.
  • Reply 32 of 97
    mjtomlinmjtomlin Posts: 2,673member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by weironfire View Post



    I really hope Apple has been taking all this time to deal directly with the individual networks. Pick a few big boys, get them on board for monthly or yearly subscription to the consumers. Then the rest will fold like a cheap suit. Directv and Comcast need to fail!

     

    The bigger issue and the reason why the government needs to step in and stop this merger, is that once this happens, Comcast will have exponentially more control over the networks. If a network doesn't agree to their terms, they threaten to drop the network. We see this happens all the time already, imagine what it would be like after this merger?

  • Reply 33 of 97
    I recently quit Comcast for U-Verse. Comcast said they compete on quality, not price. The quality was the issue you morons!
  • Reply 34 of 97
    I don't get why AT&T got shut down on their T-Mobile purchase but Comcast can just do whatever they want.
  • Reply 35 of 97
    mknoppmknopp Posts: 257member

    The government made the right decision in not allowing AT&T to buy T-mobile and look at what happened to the cell phone industry. The majority have separated phone subsidies from their plan cost and competition is leading to good changes for the consumers.

     

    How in the world could the FCC every allow this merger? The cable industry doesn't have enough competition as it is, and now they are going to let the #1 and #2 merged because the #1 says it will let 3 million customers go. That is the most asinine thing that I have ever heard. Let them go where? Let them do what? And then what is to stop them from just reacquiring those same three million customers again over the next handful of years through other means? This is stupid and in no way good for any consumer at all.

  • Reply 36 of 97
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by AjbDtc826 View Post



    Why on Earth would Apple even partner up with a cable co? Hulu I could see but hard line? Nah, everything will be cellular soon enough- cable companies will die out in a decade (including remote cities once LTEA goes live).

    It makes sense to me.  What has failed internet TV players in the past hasn't been the hardware or features, it's been the content.  Apple TV, Roku, and others have gone as far as they can with the content they have.

     

    The only thing that's going to REALLY take off is a device that has ALL of the channels that people want, including the latest shows and live TV.  Short of Apple striking deals with 60 different networks and cable channels, which I don't think will happen anytime soon, striking a deal with a big cable company gets you the content.  This is a big first step to show what is possible.  Maybe then after a few years and enough arm twisting, the cable company can be bypassed.

  • Reply 37 of 97
    j1h15233 wrote: »
    I don't get why AT&T got shut down on their T-Mobile purchase but Comcast can just do whatever they want.

    Kabletown strikes back!
  • Reply 38 of 97
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    charlituna wrote: »
    I would say that this strongly suggests that the talk of a partnership is totally bunk. This purchase deal would have been going for a while and Apple would likely know that it was in the works. So why would they going full guns with TWC only to have to start over if the purchase deal went through.

    I agree. Perhaps either the rumor was bunk all along ... or they are taking to them in anticipation, i.e. they are talking to Comcast too?

    On a side note regarding customer service from these giants: This is an odd household, we have contracts with three of the big guys. FiOS for which I pay a premium for a high upload and download speed as well as Comcast Xfinity for HD TV only, this is because Comcast is provided in our community as part of the HOA services and also AT&T for all cellular services on iPhones and iPads and we are grandfathered in for unlimited data. Dealing with either Comcast or Verizon is pretty horrible. On the other hand AT&T these days seem to have really got their act together and are amazing whenever we have an issue with iPhones or iPads.
  • Reply 39 of 97
    mknopp wrote: »
    The government made the right decision in not allowing AT&T to buy T-mobile and look at what happened to the cell phone industry. The majority have separated phone subsidies from their plan cost and competition is leading to good changes for the consumers.

    How in the world could the FCC every allow this merger? The cable industry doesn't have enough competition as it is, and now they are going to let the #1 and #2 merged because the #1 says it will let 3 million customers go. That is the most asinine thing that I have ever heard. Let them go where? Let them do what? And then what is to stop them from just reacquiring those same three million customers again over the next handful of years through other means? This is stupid and in no way good for any consumer at all.

    I hate to tell you, but it is by the hand of government (and ours is a corporatist government) that monopolies are created, not by competition. Frankly, AT&T should've gobbled up T-mobile, because they will not survive much longer unless they merge with another company. They are giving up great deals for consumers right now to inflate their growth numbers to make them a more attractive buyout, not because they are already doing well. Government should stand down and get out of the protectionism racket and let real competition winnow out the weak companies and allow market forces to play out. When companies become too big and unresponsive, people act by seeking alternatives and pouring their money into smaller, more responsive start ups. It's the story of IBM and Apple all over. Let people vote with their wallets.
  • Reply 40 of 97
    dcgoodcgoo Posts: 280member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

     

    Great. Comcast owns NBC and now Time Warner.

     


     

    Time Warner Cable is not the same company as Time Warner Media/telecom/CNN and so forth.  They spun off the cable company years ago. But otherwise I agree, this can't be  good for the general state of telecom in the U.S.  Now, if they want to become a public utility, submit to rate regulation, and spin off their content arm NBC Universal, maybe.  But somehow I don't see the Roberts family going for that. FCC *could* make a statement, but I would be surprised to see a fundamental change.  Too bad.

Sign In or Register to comment.