HP to replace audio vendor Beats with Bang & Olufsen

2

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 49
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by SpamSandwich View Post

     

    Just wait... Samsung to buy B&O. LOL!


     

     

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by RobertC View Post

     

    No, but they've worked together in the past on a number of products:

     


    Wait, they worked with Samsung?

     

    I take back what I said. This is clearly a step up for the brand.

     

    I do like that they've brought back the Hewlett-Packard branding. Even if hardly anyone remembers those two.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 49
    tommikeletommikele Posts: 599member



    Besides being wrong and not backed by proven demographics, design awards, performance reviews and audio experts, your remark is just a wee bit infantile. Try getting educated on B & O products and who is using them. Porsche, Audi, BMW, Aston Martin in the auto arena ... so I guess given the success and demographic profile for drivers of cars like those you wouldn't know too much about B & O. You sound like an angry dude who has some issues with success or your lack there of.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 49
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by TomMikele View Post

     



    Besides being wrong and not backed by proven demographics, design awards, performance reviews and audio experts, your remark is just a wee bit infantile. Try getting educated on B & O products and who is using them. Porsche, Audi, BMW, Aston Martin in the auto arena ... so I guess given the success and demographic profile for drivers of cars like those you wouldn't know too much about B & O. You sound like an angry dude who has some issues with success or your lack there of.




    Not sure who this was directed at, but I'll bite: Those systems are designed by the car companies, then later get the branding from the audio company. So B&O has some input but didn't do much.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 49
    sog35 wrote: »
     


    I'd prefer eig.....

    reported for trolling

    Not reported for being soggy.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 49
    B&O is a great old name that is mostly known to the Baby Boom set who have lost most of their hair and part of their hearing....

    I bet their hearing is a whole lot better than the young set, whose ears will have been blasted into submission at an early age by too many years of using earplugs and headphones, not to mention being deafened in clubs. I pity these souls when they get to middle age and already struggle to hear, just at a time when they are starting to appreciate good music.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 49
    9secondko9secondko Posts: 929member
    B&O is the Apple of the audio world.

    Wish Apple bought them in bateau of Beats.

    But no doubt Beats adds to Apple the diverse fan base compared to more of the same with B&O.

    As for me personally, I simply have no use for Beats anything.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 49
    9secondko wrote: »
    B&O is the Apple of the audio world.

    Wish Apple bought them in bateau of Beats.

    But no doubt Beats adds to Apple the diverse fan base compared to more of the same with B&O.

    As for me personally, I simply have no use for Beats anything.

    Ah yes; it's all about diversity these days, quality be damned.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 49
    MacPromacpro Posts: 19,873member
    B&O is a great old name that is mostly known to the Baby Boom set who have lost most of their hair and part of their hearing....

    Sorry ... what did you say? ;)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 29 of 49
    B&O is a great old name that is mostly known to the Baby Boom set who have lost most of their hair and part of their hearing....

    Sorry ... what did you say? ;)

    TIME FOR BED, GRANDAD. ????
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 30 of 49

    Is HP still a thing? I thought failed 1%er candidate Meg Whitman sold off their assets and cashed out years ago.

     

    Oh wait... That's coming...

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 49
    calicali Posts: 3,494member
    Holy Cow!

    Bang and Olufson make great products.

    Good move by HP.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 32 of 49
    calicali Posts: 3,494member

    I'd prefer eight pairs of $2,000 B&O speakers over a $17,000 Apple Watch.

    Why do people keep bringing up the $17000 apple watch?

    Well I can buy about 50 Apple Watch Sports for the price of a $17,000 Apple Watch.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 49
    cali wrote: »

    I'd prefer eight pairs of $2,000 B&O speakers over a $17,000 Apple Watch.

    Why do people keep bringing up the $17000 apple watch?

    Well I can buy about 50 Apple Watch Sports for the price of a $17,000 Apple Watch.

    The Apple Watch Edition is "the best" Apple Watch, according to Tim Cook. Therefore, it makes sense to cite it.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 34 of 49
    pscooter63pscooter63 Posts: 1,084member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Benjamin Frost View Post



    Therefore, it makes sense to cite it.

     

    No, it really doesn't.  Not in a thread about an audio vendor.

     

     

    Vote early, vote often:

    http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/185398/the-banning-of-benjamin-frost

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 35 of 49
    cnocbuicnocbui Posts: 3,613member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by TheWhiteFalcon View Post

     



    Not sure who this was directed at, but I'll bite: Those systems are designed by the car companies, then later get the branding from the audio company. So B&O has some input but didn't do much.




    You are utterly and completely wrong.

     

    Quote:


     

    Digital power amps pack a punchThe promise all of these speakers is further bolstered by its amplification: the A8 features five of B&O's acclaimed ICEpower digital power amplifiers, and a further unit containing an additional nine power amps connect to a single DSP brain via fibre-optic cable.

    This gives access to a proprietary B&O-based 7.1 processing mode, able to optimise sound to suit up to four different listening locations in the car.


    Read more at http://www.whathifi.com/news/exclusive-review-bos-car-audio-system-audi-a8#3TdWH7WVejcZmjJv.99



     

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 36 of 49
    davidwdavidw Posts: 2,183member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Benjamin Frost View Post





    The Apple Watch Edition is "the best" Apple Watch, according to Tim Cook. Therefore, it makes sense to cite it.

     

     

    Yeah, but the $2000 B&O speakers (or any B&O speakers for that matter) aren't anywhere near the "best" speakers you can buy. They (the speakers and the watch) are similar only in that they both appeal to people that rather have style over substance.  

     

    Back in the 80's and mid 90's when I was young (with better hearing) and visiting Hi End stereo stores to audition equipment, I would often see B&O systems (usually set up outside the main showrooms). And they weren't cheap, even if they weren't really considered Hi End by most of the customers that visit these stores. I once asked a dealer if they sold a lot of these. His reply was ….. "Yes, you'll be surprise how many people are satisfy with the sound of an old 70's Pioneer receiver but wants people to see that they spent a lot of money on a stereo system." 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 37 of 49
    Apple should buy Bowers & Wilkins. They are the synonym of quality and style in the audio world. ;)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 38 of 49
    Granted, the quality of B&O is not quite what it used to be the in1990s, the company's floundering a bit design-wise, and there are better speaker to be had for a higher price, but I've generally found that the only people complaining about B&O are those who can't afford it.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 39 of 49
    rpeters wrote: »
    B


    ... and who can actually afford quality audio equipment; we don't have to settle for rubbish like Beats.

    ...and did I mention "cranky," I forgot cranky....
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 40 of 49
    cnocbuicnocbui Posts: 3,613member

    No, people who complain about B&O do so because their sound quality generally did not match their price.  I could have bought B&O speakers but I preferred the sound of B&Ws.

     

    Beats, B&O and Bose are all about style and marketing taking precedence over sound quality.  B&W delivered on sound quality and went on to become the worlds largest and most successful speaker manufacturer with their products being used in numerous recording studios, something that can not be said of the other three Bs.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.