Apple partners with IBM Watson Health Cloud to bring secure cloud, data analytics to HealthKit and R
IBM on Monday announced a new cognitive computing platform called Watson Health Cloud that will, in cooperation with partners Apple, Johnson & Johnson and Medtronic, offer custom tailored data analytics services to healthcare professionals.
Built around Watson technology, IBM's new service pulls in and analyzes massive amounts of real-time data provided by personal electronic devices, such as fitness trackers, connected medical devices, implantables and other sensors. The company will also expand its MobileFirst for iOS portfolio of apps to include HealthKit-powered software.
To better serve potential customers, IBM is establishing a dedicated business arm in Boston, Mass., called IBM Watson Health that will see 2,000 consultants, medical practitioners, clinicians, developers and researchers focus on building out Watson Health. The computing giant also purchased healthcare technology companies Explorys and Phytel to expand its current healthcare analytics capabilities.
As for Apple, IBM Watson Health Cloud will offer secure, open data storage for health information logged by iOS device owners using HealthKit or taking part in ResearchKit studies. The partnership also opens up access to IBM's data analytics capabilities.
"With Apple's groundbreaking ResearchKit, researchers can easily create apps that take advantage of the power of mobile devices to give them rich data from a diverse global population," said Apple SVP of Operations Jeff Williams. "Now IBM's secure cloud and analytics capabilities provide additional tools to help accelerate discoveries across a wide variety of health issues."
Apple recently rolled out in ResearchKit as a way to tap into the 700 million-strong iPhone install base for medical research purposes. With Watson Health Cloud, data from HealthKit and ResearchKit can be anonymized, shared and combined dynamically with existing healthcare data sets that were previously difficult to access.
"Our deep understanding and history in the healthcare industry will help ensure that doctors and researchers can maximize the insights available through Apple's HealthKit and ResearchKit data," said John E. Kelly III, senior vice president at IBM research and solutions portfolio. "IBM's secure data storage and analytics solutions will enable doctors and researchers to draw on real-time insights from consumer health and behavioral data at a scale never before possible."
In addition to cloud services, IBM also plans to create a suite of enterprise apps under the MobileFirst for iOS umbrella, further extending its groundbreaking partnership with Apple. The upcoming apps will help corporations manage employee health needs, from acute diseases to general fitness.
Built around Watson technology, IBM's new service pulls in and analyzes massive amounts of real-time data provided by personal electronic devices, such as fitness trackers, connected medical devices, implantables and other sensors. The company will also expand its MobileFirst for iOS portfolio of apps to include HealthKit-powered software.
To better serve potential customers, IBM is establishing a dedicated business arm in Boston, Mass., called IBM Watson Health that will see 2,000 consultants, medical practitioners, clinicians, developers and researchers focus on building out Watson Health. The computing giant also purchased healthcare technology companies Explorys and Phytel to expand its current healthcare analytics capabilities.
As for Apple, IBM Watson Health Cloud will offer secure, open data storage for health information logged by iOS device owners using HealthKit or taking part in ResearchKit studies. The partnership also opens up access to IBM's data analytics capabilities.
"With Apple's groundbreaking ResearchKit, researchers can easily create apps that take advantage of the power of mobile devices to give them rich data from a diverse global population," said Apple SVP of Operations Jeff Williams. "Now IBM's secure cloud and analytics capabilities provide additional tools to help accelerate discoveries across a wide variety of health issues."
Apple recently rolled out in ResearchKit as a way to tap into the 700 million-strong iPhone install base for medical research purposes. With Watson Health Cloud, data from HealthKit and ResearchKit can be anonymized, shared and combined dynamically with existing healthcare data sets that were previously difficult to access.
"Our deep understanding and history in the healthcare industry will help ensure that doctors and researchers can maximize the insights available through Apple's HealthKit and ResearchKit data," said John E. Kelly III, senior vice president at IBM research and solutions portfolio. "IBM's secure data storage and analytics solutions will enable doctors and researchers to draw on real-time insights from consumer health and behavioral data at a scale never before possible."
In addition to cloud services, IBM also plans to create a suite of enterprise apps under the MobileFirst for iOS umbrella, further extending its groundbreaking partnership with Apple. The upcoming apps will help corporations manage employee health needs, from acute diseases to general fitness.
Comments
If IBM can develop a system that effectively puts the general practitioner out of business, I'd be all for it. Let doctors move into areas of extreme specialization and research.
I'd love for future Apple devices to be so connected as to be constantly monitoring the finest body functions and determining when there is a dangerous condition or health problem that needs to be addressed. Medicine today is still disturbingly primitive and relies too much on doctors who are subject to myriad distractions and concerns which may result in a misdiagnosis.
I said this after IBM/Apple announced their Enterprise partnership - just wait until they bring Watson into the picture. This is a good start. Imagine in the future where Siri is connected to Watson for various industries. If you're a doctor (for example) you can query Watson on a medical condition or symptom. IBM/Apple could charge a subscription for professional to access specific markets they bring Watson into.
That's an interesting question.
Apple has said they are not interested in looking at (or having access to) your personal health data.
However, the way it could be handled is:
IBM provides secure backend services (including private medical records, analytics, etc.) to healthcare providers
The provider could obtain the patient's authorization to: use the IBM services; allow Apple submission of their individual HealthKit/ResearchKit data to IBM.
I think that both the aggregate and and individual data would be extremely valuable in analyzing and treating health issues.
IMO, this is the most significant recent Apple-related announcement -- after the success of the Apple Watch.
That's an interesting question.
Apple has said they are not interested in looking at (or having access to) your personal health data.
However, the way it could be handled is:
IBM provides secure backend services (including private medical records, analytics, etc.) to healthcare providers
The provider could obtain the patient's authorization to: use the IBM services; allow Apple submission of their individual HealthKit/ResearchKit data to IBM.
I think that both the aggregate and and individual data would be extremely valuable in analyzing and treating health issues.
IMO, this is the most significant recent Apple-related announcement -- after the success of the Apple Watch.
Our individual anonymized private health data could still be made available to IBM for analysis and then the results could be continually updated.
http://www.ibm.com/smarterplanet/us/en/ibmwatson/health/
I'm not clear whether or not Apple is providing data from the Health app to IBM (aggregated or not).
Congrats to Mr. Cook for his new partnership with IBM, but I'm checking out:
Settings >> Privacy >> Motion & Fitness >> Fitness Tracking >> Health >> Off
Congrats to Mr. Cook for his new partnership with IBM, but I'm checking out:
Settings >> Privacy >> Motion & Fitness >> Fitness Tracking >> Health >> Off
Why are you responding to yourself?
Congrats to Mr. Cook for his new partnership with IBM, but I'm checking out:
Settings >> Privacy >> Motion & Fitness >> Fitness Tracking >> Health >> Off
Why are you responding to yourself?
So people would know what I was referencing, of course.
Besides, I happen to be excellent company.
Yes!
And almost every one of these Apple/IBM announcements will involve IT support at the various enterprises ...
IT will want to write their own apps to interface the Apple/IBM offerings ...
Likely, the IT apps will be written in Swift on Macs to interface the Apple/IBM apps running on iDevices and IBM's cloud.
It's hard to see any downside to this.
If IBM can develop a system that effectively puts the general practitioner out of business, I'd be all for it. Let doctors move into areas of extreme specialization and research.
This sounds crazy to me. I'm in the medical industry so perhaps I'm too close to it to understand your issue with general practitioners, which probably has some absurd underlying libertarian political rational.
If you have ever worked in an ER or with battle field medics, or volunteered in third world countries to help fight diseases, then you might gain a new appreciation for general practitioners. They are the front line. Perhaps you should think of general practice as a specialty.
Even in first world countries, you have to make an appointment with a family medicine doctor before you can see a specialist, which makes perfect sense to me. Are you suggesting people should try to make an appointment with a neurosurgeon and a radiologist when they have a migraine headache because, you know, it could be a brain tumor.
I, for one, welcome our new...blah, blah, blah...
Sorry. Had to say it.
If IBM can develop a system that effectively puts the general practitioner out of business, I'd be all for it..
Why the general practitioner?? They provide an overall one-stop service and then (if necessary) guide you to the next stop. I love my GP. What's your beef?
Why the general practitioner?? They provide an overall one-stop service and then (if necessary) guide you to the next stop. I love my GP. What's your beef?
No beef whatsoever. In the near future, the socialized medicine system the public has regrettably chosen to embrace will be quickly overwhelmed by the sheer number of patients who will require attention (just check into the population of physicians versus the Boomer population over the next 10-20 years...it's not looking good). Any automation or artificial intelligence that can replace the first tier of medical advice and examination will soon become a mathematical necessity, not a distant possibility...and I expect Apple and IBM will be at the forefront of this type of "doctor supplement and replacement".
In the near future, the socialized medicine system the public has regrettably chosen to embrace will be quickly overwhelmed by the sheer number of patients who will require attention
So I gather in your world, 'require attention' and 'deserve attention' are two different things. I hope you don't someday find yourself on the short end of that determination. Sounds to me that more GPs are better than fewer, considering your doomsday scenario.
You live in a fantasy world.
is this really your rebuttal? Because current demographic and technological trends support my scenario.
Why the personal attack?