Off on a tangent again, are you? So that you miss the point, just like the "filmmakers" did?
The problem is the amount of useless, snaggy thread hanging out on that screw, and the mishmash of jamb nuts being used to lock down the screw, nuts that look like they came from the 99 cents store.
This was probably shot in Uncle Ernie's garage in Queens. A machinist who cared would use a shorter screw if he absolutely had to rig up some mess like this. No way would he want anyone to see it as an example of his work.
So you're telling us the problem is fixable in post? Nice.
I don't think one can give Samsung the "credit" of copying the ideas of an ad. Ads are made by marketing communication companies, and the one that made the Samsung ad, was apparently not in a very creative mode.
Ideas for marketing communication are not protected by any means, so ideas that worked in the past are picked up by others and repackaged
Lol! It makes my friends mad when ever I ask them "why does your iPhone says Samsung on it?" Yet they is nothing they can say. And the battery life is bad on the s6
Actually there are plenty that while technically right, are also technically meaningless because they are right by a wide margin.
Namely, the materials and measuring in nanometers.
First, the materials are by no means impossible.
Curved glass are used extensively in architecture.
Aluminium are used in auto parts, aircraft parts, ladders, etc. a good percentage of those auto and aircraft parts are milled, for their purposes, they are so hard that they don't dent when dropped, so i am pretty sure their aluminium are denser then a phone's
And diamond tipped bits are nothing new, what do you think we used when steel bits could not do the job? Lasers? They are not the most cost effective option for most commercial projects and Lasers are presently confined to cutting 2D shapes from sheets of materials in terms of mass production.
Why did they not mention their curved oled? Thats something that actually is novel!
But the one thing that really caught my attention was that bit about measuring in nanometers. I would like to explain something and then let you know what i think of that. First off, some information.
A nanometer is
1/1,000,000,000 of a meter, or 0.000000001 or a meter.
Most manufacturing industry measures in microns or in terms of micro meters,
Which is 1/1,000,000 of a meter, or 0.000001 of a meter.
Now, thermal expansion,
Going from 20°c to 21°c,
A strip of 10 cm long aluminium strip would grow by about 2.4microns, or 0.0000024 of a meter.
A strip of 10cm long glass, would grow by about 0.9microns, or 0.0000009 of a meter.
What this means is that if you were looking for deviations on the order of nanometers, you are looking for deviations of +/-0.0000000xx of a meter. Coupled with thermal expansion, your results will fluctuate by thousands of nanometers off because you cannot absolutely control temperature(human touch transfer heat for instance). Your measurements are literally functionally useless when viewed at the nanometer scale, you might as well use the micrometer scale.
So all in all with all that considered, i thus would like to state for the record that, That video is full of bullshit.
---
Addon:
Here are some objects that measure about 10 micron :
Samsung is copying everything they can from Apple, except the one thing that makes them successful: a commitment to creating superlative products that delight their customers. Samsung is motivated solely by greed, and to them everything else is just a means to achieve that end. The results speaks for themselves.
So I was wrong about the wonky-tooling scene being shot at Uncle Ernie's garage in Queens.
The ad agency is [B]72andSunny[/B], the same LA ultracool hipster sell-outs who were responsible for the Samsung ads that mocked the Apple line-waiters for the iPhone 5 (?).
So the offending "tooling" shot was probably snagged somewhere locally, near the wasteland of ex-aerospace job shops that surround their offices in Westchester and Inglewood.
How would these clowns know what real tooling looks like anyway? They spend as much time getting manicures as their wives used to spend, back when such people had wives. Probably they don't even put air in their tires.
If Samsung had any integrity they'd fire these effete "creatives" for making the company a laughing-stock.
This company doesn't have an original creative bone in their body. They should hang their heads in shame. But instead they see stealing as a virtue, thumbing their nose at intellectual property on a worldwide basis.
Right on, Samsung terribly lacks creativity.
They have been fairly successful copying Apple's products,
but have come out with a few ideas on their own, which they soon drop.
After Apple got after Samsung for their obvious copying, Samsung have been sadly lacking in their designs.
Comments
Off on a tangent again, are you? So that you miss the point, just like the "filmmakers" did?
The problem is the amount of useless, snaggy thread hanging out on that screw, and the mishmash of jamb nuts being used to lock down the screw, nuts that look like they came from the 99 cents store.
This was probably shot in Uncle Ernie's garage in Queens. A machinist who cared would use a shorter screw if he absolutely had to rig up some mess like this. No way would he want anyone to see it as an example of his work.
So you're telling us the problem is fixable in post? Nice.
We are Samsung. Next is somebody else's ideas.
We suck.
I don't think one can give Samsung the "credit" of copying the ideas of an ad. Ads are made by marketing communication companies, and the one that made the Samsung ad, was apparently not in a very creative mode.
Ideas for marketing communication are not protected by any means, so ideas that worked in the past are picked up by others and repackaged
Yeah, I was going to mention that. He also has a slight lisp, but that might be the de-esser kicking in a little too aggressively in the studio.
Listening to him, I got the impression that he's not British - he's Korean, but from an international school background.
Just a hunch, though.
Have you seen the Phillies play? Haha. I'm a fan.
I think his dad was a Yankees fan since the Phillies were dreadful back in the day while the yanks won a lot.
I doubt that ever happens.
Agreed. Were Apple not continually learning how to shrink things into smaller footprints they wouldn't be able to release new products like the watch.
Or, as Walter Sobchak put it, so succinctly... Well, OK, that's not strictly about Samsung and Google, but you get the idea.
after extolling the material "design" aspects of their latest cheapest parts amalgamation
Because that QHD screen and 16MP camera are really bargain basement compared to what you get in an iPhone 6...
In other words, an imitation British accent! Seems fitting for Sammy.
Why is everyone so sure the voiceover was by a Brit? Sounded Australian to me.
Namely, the materials and measuring in nanometers.
First, the materials are by no means impossible.
Curved glass are used extensively in architecture.
Aluminium are used in auto parts, aircraft parts, ladders, etc. a good percentage of those auto and aircraft parts are milled, for their purposes, they are so hard that they don't dent when dropped, so i am pretty sure their aluminium are denser then a phone's
And diamond tipped bits are nothing new, what do you think we used when steel bits could not do the job? Lasers? They are not the most cost effective option for most commercial projects and Lasers are presently confined to cutting 2D shapes from sheets of materials in terms of mass production.
Why did they not mention their curved oled? Thats something that actually is novel!
But the one thing that really caught my attention was that bit about measuring in nanometers. I would like to explain something and then let you know what i think of that. First off, some information.
A nanometer is
1/1,000,000,000 of a meter, or 0.000000001 or a meter.
Most manufacturing industry measures in microns or in terms of micro meters,
Which is 1/1,000,000 of a meter, or 0.000001 of a meter.
Now, thermal expansion,
Going from 20°c to 21°c,
A strip of 10 cm long aluminium strip would grow by about 2.4microns, or 0.0000024 of a meter.
A strip of 10cm long glass, would grow by about
0.9microns, or 0.0000009 of a meter.
What this means is that if you were looking for deviations on the order of nanometers, you are looking for deviations of +/-0.0000000xx of a meter. Coupled with thermal expansion, your results will fluctuate by thousands of nanometers off because you cannot absolutely control temperature(human touch transfer heat for instance). Your measurements are literally functionally useless when viewed at the nanometer scale, you might as well use the micrometer scale.
So all in all with all that considered, i thus would like to state for the record that, That video is full of bullshit.
---
Addon:
Here are some objects that measure about 10 micron :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10_micrometres
Notice at the end paper is just under 100 microns thick,
Blood cells are about 10 microns wide,
This goes further to show,
A) you wont see thermal expansion of 2microns and
You can compare wit this video.
Who wrote this trash, I wonder? Which is the ad agency we should congratulate for coming up with this?
Where is real business journalism to be found now?
Samsung is copying everything they can from Apple, except the one thing that makes them successful: a commitment to creating superlative products that delight their customers. Samsung is motivated solely by greed, and to them everything else is just a means to achieve that end. The results speaks for themselves.
The ad agency is [B]72andSunny[/B], the same LA ultracool hipster sell-outs who were responsible for the Samsung ads that mocked the Apple line-waiters for the iPhone 5 (?).
So the offending "tooling" shot was probably snagged somewhere locally, near the wasteland of ex-aerospace job shops that surround their offices in Westchester and Inglewood.
How would these clowns know what real tooling looks like anyway? They spend as much time getting manicures as their wives used to spend, back when such people had wives. Probably they don't even put air in their tires.
If Samsung had any integrity they'd fire these effete "creatives" for making the company a laughing-stock.
This company doesn't have an original creative bone in their body. They should hang their heads in shame. But instead they see stealing as a virtue, thumbing their nose at intellectual property on a worldwide basis.
Right on, Samsung terribly lacks creativity.
They have been fairly successful copying Apple's products,
but have come out with a few ideas on their own, which they soon drop.
After Apple got after Samsung for their obvious copying, Samsung have been sadly lacking in their designs.
LOL