I see a lot of you accusing the spokes person from Swatch of lying. Can any of you actually show any proof what so ever that Swatch is lying about the reason behind this patent application? Can you...step up now if you can. Innocent until proven guilty.
I see a lot of you accusing the spokes person from Swatch of lying. Can any of you actually show any proof what so ever that Swatch is lying about the reason behind this patent application? Can you...step up now if you can. Innocent until proven guilty.
So, if it looks like dog sh*t and smells like dog sh*t, do you need to step in it to make sure its dog sh*t?
So, if it looks like dog sh*t and smells like dog sh*t, do you need to step in it to make sure its dog sh*t?
Funny, you still haven't managed to do what I asked. Instead using an example of the simply obvious. The comment from Swatch is exactly that, a comment, so without knowing what is going on in the company you can not say with any accuracy that they are lying or telling the truth. NEXT...
Funny, you still haven't managed to do what I asked. Instead using an example of the simply obvious. The comment from Swatch is exactly that, a comment, so without knowing what is going on in the company you can not say with any accuracy that they are lying or telling the truth. NEXT...
Honestly I couldn't care less about Swatch, but you did answer my question, apparently you do need to step in it to make sure it's dog sh*t.
I was just thinking...... "didn't some guy* on AI bring up Columbo a couple of days ago?!", and I came across your post! You sure done messed up, buddy....
Priceless.
*Sorry I could not remember who it was.
I wouldn't doubt it if he helped. With the internet anyone can look up and find anything. Could have been a low level Swatch employee who pointed it out to them.
Because of this I no longer share big ideas online anymore. I'm genuinely afraid Samsung will steal one of them. They should coin a new phobia for this. Scamsungphonia or something.
Honestly I couldn't care less about Swatch, but you did answer my question, apparently you do need to step in it to make sure it's dog sh*t.
If you read my reply I said " using an example of the simply obvious" this means something that its obvious and requires no proof because of common sense. But if someone made a comment about something and you have no way of proving what they said was fact or fiction then you cant call them a liar simply because you think they are. As for the dog s#1t, only an idiot would step in it to test if it was real.
If you read my reply I said " using an example of the simply obvious" this means something that its obvious and requires no proof because of common sense. But if someone made a comment about something and you have no way of proving what they said was fact or fiction then you cant call them a liar simply because you think they are. As for the dog s#1t, only an idiot would step in it to test if it was real.
So you believe Swatch marketing is referencing a cigar smoking, slob of a cop from a 70's TV show, good for you. Since we're not in "The People's Court" (I borrow from the 80's) the rest of us will see this for the farce that it is...
Don't be. They chose to embrace this joke of an excuse. As if anyone doesn't see through it. Film noir? Oh really? Columbo is the last thing I think of when I think of film noir.
I'd love to see some mid-level manger of Swatch squirm under oath as Apple's lawyers hit them with "Tick Different" and how their Columbo excuse for "One more thing" just doesn't jive with the it coming along with the "Tick Different " trademark application.
Apple lawyer: "So you're saying that it's just an amazing coincidence that these 2 slogans are so similar to previously used Apple slogans and marks? I'll remind you: you're under oath..."
Hey Swatch: welcome to my blacklist of companies I'll never buy a product from again. Samsung might appreciate your company.
Swatch's position is complete nonsense. Trademarks are industry specific. For example, Apple Computer, Inc. (now renamed Apple, Inc.) and Apple Corps (the Beatles' company) only had a trademark clash when Apple Computer, Inc. started to do music. Columbo has nothing to do with the watch industry and is therefore completely irrelevant. All trademark law disputes are judged primarily on the basis of whether or not consumers would be confused about the origin of a product.
Don't be. They chose to embrace this joke of an excuse. As if anyone doesn't see through it. Film noir? Oh really? Columbo is the last thing I think of when I think of film noir.
Comments
I see a lot of you accusing the spokes person from Swatch of lying. Can any of you actually show any proof what so ever that Swatch is lying about the reason behind this patent application? Can you...step up now if you can. Innocent until proven guilty.
I see a lot of you accusing the spokes person from Swatch of lying. Can any of you actually show any proof what so ever that Swatch is lying about the reason behind this patent application? Can you...step up now if you can. Innocent until proven guilty.
So, if it looks like dog sh*t and smells like dog sh*t, do you need to step in it to make sure its dog sh*t?
Rough and Ready models: McCloud
Suave sophisticate: Name of the Game
All with ads playing creepy whistling music and a guy with a flash light searching for swatch dealers in the fog.
So, if it looks like dog sh*t and smells like dog sh*t, do you need to step in it to make sure its dog sh*t?
Funny, you still haven't managed to do what I asked. Instead using an example of the simply obvious. The comment from Swatch is exactly that, a comment, so without knowing what is going on in the company you can not say with any accuracy that they are lying or telling the truth. NEXT...
I heard a rumor Swatch is considering developing a car. A Sweugeot, perhaps?
First thing they said when they heard Columbo used to say this... "Who is Columbo"?
Honestly I couldn't care less about Swatch, but you did answer my question, apparently you do need to step in it to make sure it's dog sh*t.
Swatch is irrelevant. Should be called Swoosh, you know, Swiss for douche.
I wouldn't doubt it if he helped. With the internet anyone can look up and find anything. Could have been a low level Swatch employee who pointed it out to them.
Because of this I no longer share big ideas online anymore. I'm genuinely afraid Samsung will steal one of them. They should coin a new phobia for this. Scamsungphonia or something.
Why trademark the famous Steve Jobs quote?
Didn't Jeff Bozo trademark "One Last Thing" or something similar?
He used it at the end of the FiREPhone unveil.
Honestly I couldn't care less about Swatch, but you did answer my question, apparently you do need to step in it to make sure it's dog sh*t.
If you read my reply I said " using an example of the simply obvious" this means something that its obvious and requires no proof because of common sense. But if someone made a comment about something and you have no way of proving what they said was fact or fiction then you cant call them a liar simply because you think they are. As for the dog s#1t, only an idiot would step in it to test if it was real.
If you read my reply I said " using an example of the simply obvious" this means something that its obvious and requires no proof because of common sense. But if someone made a comment about something and you have no way of proving what they said was fact or fiction then you cant call them a liar simply because you think they are. As for the dog s#1t, only an idiot would step in it to test if it was real.
So you believe Swatch marketing is referencing a cigar smoking, slob of a cop from a 70's TV show, good for you. Since we're not in "The People's Court" (I borrow from the 80's) the rest of us will see this for the farce that it is...
Don't be. They chose to embrace this joke of an excuse. As if anyone doesn't see through it. Film noir? Oh really? Columbo is the last thing I think of when I think of film noir.
Apple lawyer: "So you're saying that it's just an amazing coincidence that these 2 slogans are so similar to previously used Apple slogans and marks? I'll remind you: you're under oath..."
Hey Swatch: welcome to my blacklist of companies I'll never buy a product from again. Samsung might appreciate your company.
I only have this to add about that miserable, sorry excuse for a company. And to think I used to own and wear stuff from Swatch…
By the way, I was only joking, of course, but I came across this…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rickettsia_helvetica
Apparently there's a tick-borne bacterium named after Switzerland. How quaint!
Fixed that for yer.
Maybe they have still b/w TV sets