Apple should know how this works by now; either they come back with full proof that they did not force the cutting of the Drake stream; or else, said accusation sticks.
Apple should start by suing Tidal for slander.
Er … no, that's not how it works. Tidal made the accusation, so they need to prove it. What's that? They won't because the want to keep it classy? Yes, because posting a poorly worded accusation and then refusing to show the evidence wreaks of 'classy'.
Show the proof, or it didn't happen.
Errrrrrrr …Yes that is exactly how it works. Or maybe you are too young to remember Antennagate, or that Apple's employees routinely commit suicide, or any other of the falsehoods that have been leveled at Apple, and yet, that they have allowed to stick in the mind of public opinion.
But this this time, this is a hard and fast example of a specific charge (false?) distributed to the mass public, by a corporation.
If Apple doesn't sue for slander. then Apple deserves exactly what they get.
(Then again, maybe you just didn't understand my OP)
Personally I think both Apple and Tidal will avoid commenting, or in the case of Tidal commenting further. I suspect there's some grain of truth in there somewhere but not perhaps anything cut and dried, so neither side will want to get into it much.
The strange part of Tidal's continued childish behavior of fabricating sensation to gain attention is the artist investors in the company. They worked hard to become respected in the industry and have amassed fortunes that enable them to do whatever they dream of doing. Being silent about how Tidal continues to behave may come back to bite them.
I agree Apple most likely remain silent about this latest slander. Staying focused on its goals is the way Apple does things. The live stream Apple Music Festival is coming up next month. Apple most likely will be promoting the event worldwide using Internet, newspapers, magazines, radio, billboards, email, social networks, etc. I saw nothing about Tidal's event.
Apple's lawyers do need to have a call-- the accusation is defamatory, and will stick (like all the other bullshit people have made up about apple over the years) unless Tidal retracts it. And Tidal should retract it because otherwise they could be facing serious liability.
Errrrrrrr …Yes that is exactly how it works. Or maybe you are too young to remember Antennagate, or that Apple's employees routinely commit suicide, or any other of the falsehoods that have been leveled at Apple, and yet, that they have allowed to stick in the mind of public opinion.
But this this time, this is a hard and fast example of a specific charge (false?) distributed to the mass public, by a corporation.
If Apple doesn't sue for slander. then Apple deserves exactly what they get.
(Then again, maybe you just didn't understand my OP)
Too young to remember antenna gate? Lol that was 4 years ago. It's not ancient history. I'm sure the responder is at least that old. Idiot!
TMZ: "Jay Z's beef with Tim XX resulted in a shooting outside popular SF club Streamy. Sources say someone in Tim's entourage got all up the face of Jay's main boy. Someone started swinging until shots rang out and both crews scattered as cops arrived."
Hate to say it but this is what happens when Apple shows weakness by buckling to pressure from the likes of Taylor Swift. Now everyone is taking shots at them in the name of artists when it's always been about record labels and contracts. I don't think this one will cost Apple any money or even tarnish their image but there will be many more stunts like this in the future and one of them will bite Apple.
It upsets me that Apple is getting involved with Hip Hop Thug Rappers and all the negative connotations that come with that decision. What’s next, a drive by shooting with bullet holes in Tim Cook’s office window at 1 Infinite Loop? A Tupac hologram at the next WWDC? A Biggie Small statue in the atrium of the spaceship when it’s complete?
Except Apple won't pursue it because Tidal are probably correct. Why would they lie? […] ]Apple are like Scientology in their secrecy and propensity to sue.
So Tidal has no reason to be either dishonest or mistake, but Apple not only has every reason in the world to be deceptive, but lives for it. Got it¡
It upsets me that Apple is getting involved with Hip Hop Thug Rappers and all the negative connotations that come with that decision. What’s next, a drive by shooting with bullet holes in Tim Cook’s office window at 1 Infinite Loop? A Tupac hologram at the next WWDC? A Biggie Small statue in the atrium of the spaceship when it’s complete?
This really, really concerns me.
You honestly want us to believe you're concerned about anything when you make comments about "Hip Hop Thug Rappers" and "bullet holes in Tim Cook’s office window at 1 Infinite Loop" and a "Tupac hologram" and a "Biggie Small statue"? :rolleyes:
Tidal either has solid evidence or stupid lawyers. You don't say something like that.. it's simply not smart (esp. when you're up against a juggernaut - legally speaking) like Apple.
What's the angle for Apple? Stop the stream, or file suit after..... it will look like Apple is TAKING MONEY from a Katrina benefit...
with the cash they have on hand.. they'd charge this one off.
Don't get me wrong, I can see all kinds of C&Ds coming out of Apple if this was just a regular show.
There could be a clause in Drake's agreement with Apple that says if he doesn't make $XX - Apple doesn't consider it in violation - but the Tidal lawyers only saw the part about "we'll sue you back to last week if you...."
Errrrrrrr …Yes that is exactly how it works. Or maybe you are too young to remember Antennagate, or that Apple's employees routinely commit suicide, or any other of the falsehoods that have been leveled at Apple, and yet, that they have allowed to stick in the mind of public opinion.
But this this time, this is a hard and fast example of a specific charge (false?) distributed to the mass public, by a corporation.
If Apple doesn't sue for slander. then Apple deserves exactly what they get.
(Then again, maybe you just didn't understand my OP)
Too young to remember antenna gate? Lol that was 4 years ago. It's not ancient history. I'm sure the responder is at least that old. Idiot!
Except it was 5 years ago, and it's not unreasonable for someone who A: didn't have a smart phone at that time or B; was 11 or 12yo at the time.
Im guessing that if you took a poll now a significant number would not know what antenna gate was. But at the time virtually every one knew about it and many believed it even after it was proven (beyond a doubt) to be a contrived problem.
Trying to win an argument by attempting to belittle and cast personal dispersions (the idiot comment) especially when it is as poorly reasoned as your argument was only reflects (very) badly on yourself.
My advice? Grow up, and act reasonable to people (even those you may disagree with), you will go much further in life.
You honestly want us to believe you're concerned about anything when you make comments about "Hip Hop Thug Rappers" and "bullet holes in Tim Cook’s office window at 1 Infinite Loop" and a "Tupac hologram" and a "Biggie Small statue"? :rolleyes:
Apple also doesn't sue the multitude of trolls posting BS, FUD, and lies in forums or the tech press. You cannot use Apple's absence of comment as proof of guilt.
Comments
Apple should know how this works by now; either they come back with full proof that they did not force the cutting of the Drake stream; or else, said accusation sticks.
Apple should start by suing Tidal for slander.
Er … no, that's not how it works. Tidal made the accusation, so they need to prove it. What's that? They won't because the want to keep it classy? Yes, because posting a poorly worded accusation and then refusing to show the evidence wreaks of 'classy'.
Show the proof, or it didn't happen.
Errrrrrrr …Yes that is exactly how it works. Or maybe you are too young to remember Antennagate, or that Apple's employees routinely commit suicide, or any other of the falsehoods that have been leveled at Apple, and yet, that they have allowed to stick in the mind of public opinion.
But this this time, this is a hard and fast example of a specific charge (false?) distributed to the mass public, by a corporation.
If Apple doesn't sue for slander. then Apple deserves exactly what they get.
(Then again, maybe you just didn't understand my OP)
The strange part of Tidal's continued childish behavior of fabricating sensation to gain attention is the artist investors in the company. They worked hard to become respected in the industry and have amassed fortunes that enable them to do whatever they dream of doing. Being silent about how Tidal continues to behave may come back to bite them.
I agree Apple most likely remain silent about this latest slander. Staying focused on its goals is the way Apple does things. The live stream Apple Music Festival is coming up next month. Apple most likely will be promoting the event worldwide using Internet, newspapers, magazines, radio, billboards, email, social networks, etc. I saw nothing about Tidal's event.
I'm not sure, since those original gangsta rappers are so old now they may need a 'hip' replacement.
Well, at least a hip-hop replacement.
Classy....rolling out bunch of millionaire musicians on a stage ...and then asking for twice the price..
TC
Too young to remember antenna gate? Lol that was 4 years ago. It's not ancient history. I'm sure the responder is at least that old. Idiot!
Originally Posted by BobSchlob
If Apple doesn't sue for slander.
Picky picky grammar police but I think it would be libel, not slander.
Yeah, but even after hip surgery they can still 'hop'.
Apple all gangsta now. Thanks Beats.
Hate to say it but this is what happens when Apple shows weakness by buckling to pressure from the likes of Taylor Swift. Now everyone is taking shots at them in the name of artists when it's always been about record labels and contracts. I don't think this one will cost Apple any money or even tarnish their image but there will be many more stunts like this in the future and one of them will bite Apple.
Too young to remember antenna gate? Lol that was 4 years ago. It's not ancient history. I'm sure the responder is at least that old. Idiot!
-1. These forums really need a thumbs down button.
It upsets me that Apple is getting involved with Hip Hop Thug Rappers and all the negative connotations that come with that decision. What’s next, a drive by shooting with bullet holes in Tim Cook’s office window at 1 Infinite Loop? A Tupac hologram at the next WWDC? A Biggie Small statue in the atrium of the spaceship when it’s complete?
This really, really concerns me.
So Tidal has no reason to be either dishonest or mistake, but Apple not only has every reason in the world to be deceptive, but lives for it. Got it¡
You honestly want us to believe you're concerned about anything when you make comments about "Hip Hop Thug Rappers" and "bullet holes in Tim Cook’s office window at 1 Infinite Loop" and a "Tupac hologram" and a "Biggie Small statue"? :rolleyes:
OK, let's see those threatening emails.
or the
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/libel
charges
Tidal either has solid evidence or stupid lawyers. You don't say something like that.. it's simply not smart (esp. when you're up against a juggernaut - legally speaking) like Apple.
What's the angle for Apple? Stop the stream, or file suit after..... it will look like Apple is TAKING MONEY from a Katrina benefit...
with the cash they have on hand.. they'd charge this one off.
Don't get me wrong, I can see all kinds of C&Ds coming out of Apple if this was just a regular show.
There could be a clause in Drake's agreement with Apple that says if he doesn't make $XX - Apple doesn't consider it in violation - but the Tidal lawyers only saw the part about "we'll sue you back to last week if you...."
"Apple's employees"? Nope. Foxconn.
Too young to remember antenna gate? Lol that was 4 years ago. It's not ancient history. I'm sure the responder is at least that old. Idiot!
Except it was 5 years ago, and it's not unreasonable for someone who A: didn't have a smart phone at that time or B; was 11 or 12yo at the time.
Im guessing that if you took a poll now a significant number would not know what antenna gate was. But at the time virtually every one knew about it and many believed it even after it was proven (beyond a doubt) to be a contrived problem.
Trying to win an argument by attempting to belittle and cast personal dispersions (the idiot comment) especially when it is as poorly reasoned as your argument was only reflects (very) badly on yourself.
My advice? Grow up, and act reasonable to people (even those you may disagree with), you will go much further in life.
He was probably trolling.
Or still mad about the Beats deal.
Apple also doesn't sue the multitude of trolls posting BS, FUD, and lies in forums or the tech press. You cannot use Apple's absence of comment as proof of guilt.