Apple's first iPhone was also the first to realize the potential of the smartphone

Posted:
in iPhone edited June 2017
The iPhone was the phone I'd wanted all along. I had been trying to use cell phones as if they were iPhones for years, but nothing really stuck.




On January 9, 2007, I was at the Moscone Center in San Francisco. I was working for a company that made TV tuners for Mac, and we sold in Apple stores across the U.S.

I was setting up the booth at Macworld 2007 while the keynote was going on, and missed out on the big iPhone announcement. Everyone else in the company was at the presentation and came back more excited than I'd ever seen them. At the Apple stage, there were employees taking questions about iPhone with the model displayed in its glass cylinder.

AppleTV was also introduced at the event, and they had tables upon tables of AppleTV and televisions connected so that we could experience Apple's first move into home entertainment. Katie Cotton was on site and handling press requests, which were coming like a barrage. Macworld became overwhelmed overnight with everyone who got on a flight from Las Vegas leaving CES to come see the phone that would change every phone after it.

Years before, I had a Sony Ericsson T616, which I bought because it was on the list of phones that Apple showed as working with iSync. I modified it with OS X sounds and animations (the progress wheel, the 2003 Apple logo, the Jaguar wallpaper) all to make it feel more Apple-like. Having contact and photos sync was powerful. At that time, people were used to having to edit contacts in the phone. Being able to write the contacts at the Mac and sync them across was powerful.

Then I got a few Nokia s60 Symbian-based phones. These were my first phones with an App Store. It was a bit horrible, but I was able to Skype chat and message from them, and participate in IRC chat (which is a prehistoric version of Slack for young people who don't know). These were also purchased because they were iSync compatible. Apps were written in Java and Qt, which were awful, but worked. Mostly.

On June 29, 2007, I had a friend wait outside a store in Beaverton, Ore., to get me an iPhone and Fedex it to me on the other side of the country. Years later, he and I would stand in line together to get the iPhone 5 on its release day.

The iPhone was the first phone that did all the things the others before it had promised. I still think its rounded aluminum back is one of the best designs, with its shiny chrome bezel. I really liked everything about it, even in its early days without copy paste, proper GPS, or MMS picture messaging. It was simply the best phone there was for the time.

This was a time when people still phoned each other regularly, and visual voicemail was the thing that made it the very best phone available. The notion that you could fast forward through messages and hear them out of order made it the phone I had to have. I remember updating to iOS 2 the day it came out in order to have an App Store at Macworld 2008.

Now, the world has changed, but the iPhone has kept up. Messages, FaceTime, and things like iCloud shared notes and calendars have kept it one step ahead of the other options that have sprung up as challengers. I powered on that original iPhone: It still has Textie installed, which I used for sending messages over wifi or cellular data, just as Messages does today.

Back then, in 2007, I was driving to Ohio for my cousin's wedding, and on the way I got a call from a friend from high school. He was getting married and asked if I could attend. Just after the first wedding ended, I drove to Virginia, to somewhere I'd describe as off the beaten path. Afterwards, I tried to navigate home.

Using the iPhone as a compass (because it didn't have turn by turn directions), and being so far out that AT&T didn't have good signal, I'd drive for a while, wait until I had enough signal for AT&T to draw a map, drive a little more, and as long as I got on roads that would take me south and east, I'd eventually hit something that I'd recognize as a road to get me home.

Back in those days, it was still important to be able to read a map as a skill, something that with turn-by-turn and traffic avoidance has become largely unnecessary. For most of my drive, I was a blue dot on graph paper, using the compass to make sure I was heading in something resembling the right direction. By about 2 a.m. I started to find small state roads that had familiar numbers, and could load enough map data to see where I needed to turn. I made it back. I'm sure there may have been a better route, but that's how Maps on iPhone got me home.

HP used to advertise that they were making the computer personal again. Apple always said the Macintosh was the computer for the rest of us. When iPhone launched, Mike Lazardis, CEO of Blackberry, got his hands on one and took it apart. He's reputed to have said, "How did they put a Macintosh inside the phone?"

Apple regularly tells us that the iPad is the future of computing. It all started with that one phone that first saw light of day back in January 2007, that's led to iOS fulfilling the Mac's promise as the computer for the rest of us.
lolliverrandomthot2watto_cobranchia
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 33
    I find Mike Lazardis' comment very revealing. If you can't figure out how Steve "squeezed a Mac" into a phone when everything is right there in front of you, how do you expect to understand what it is capable of and where the future is headed? 
    radarthekatwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 33
    vmarksvmarks Posts: 762editor
    I find Mike Lazardis' comment very revealing. If you can't figure out how Steve "squeezed a Mac" into a phone when everything is right there in front of you, how do you expect to understand what it is capable of and where the future is headed? 
    They were convinced they'd be fine. They had all of US Congress on Blackberry, and a number of other government contracts besides. They believed it was a fad, because real keyboards made them what they were.
    radarthekattmaywatto_cobraanton zuykovbb-15
  • Reply 3 of 33
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    vmarks said:
    I find Mike Lazardis' comment very revealing. If you can't figure out how Steve "squeezed a Mac" into a phone when everything is right there in front of you, how do you expect to understand what it is capable of and where the future is headed? 
    They were convinced they'd be fine. They had all of US Congress on Blackberry, and a number of other government contracts besides. They believed it was a fad, because real keyboards made them what they were.
    I seem to recall that the co-CEOs of Blackberry nee Research in Motion also didn't believe that Steve Jobs' January 2007 demo was authentic because they couldn't believe that the OS could be that responsive to mobile HW.
    radarthekat[Deleted User]watto_cobraanton zuykovbb-15
  • Reply 4 of 33
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    BTW, I'm loving these articles about the last decade. I'd like to see more of these as Apple has has many, many milestones over the years. For example, next year on 23 April 2018 will be the 10th anniversary of Apple buying PA Semi. Remember when people said that was a wait of money and that Apple couldn't possibly make a decent chip? In 2010 Apple introduced the iPad with the A4 chip and we've seen nothing but just success from Apple in this area. So much success that Apple's power per watt and lithography is besting the expensive and heavily wasted features on Intel's offerings.

    [Deleted User]tmaywatto_cobraanantksundaram
  • Reply 5 of 33
    bluefire1bluefire1 Posts: 1,302member
    Even though I buy a new Phone every year and sell the previous year's model to Gazelle, I kept my 2007 iPhone. Even after a decade, it still remains a beautiful, disruptive device that changed everything. 
    Thanks Apple!
    williamlondonwatto_cobraanton zuykovanantksundarambb-15
  • Reply 6 of 33
    vmarksvmarks Posts: 762editor
    Soli said:
    vmarks said:
    I find Mike Lazardis' comment very revealing. If you can't figure out how Steve "squeezed a Mac" into a phone when everything is right there in front of you, how do you expect to understand what it is capable of and where the future is headed? 
    They were convinced they'd be fine. They had all of US Congress on Blackberry, and a number of other government contracts besides. They believed it was a fad, because real keyboards made them what they were.
    I seem to recall that the co-CEOs of Blackberry nee Research in Motion also didn't believe that Steve Jobs' January 2007 demo was authentic because they couldn't believe that the OS could be that responsive to mobile HW.
    They were very vocal about their disbelief, and their confidence that they couldn't lose their lead.

    They weren't alone. Ed Colligan said, those computer guys aren't going to walk in here and be able to do mobile.
    Ballmer had a few good ones, on the price, and there's no chance that the iPhone is going to get significant market share, no chance.

    Blackberry: 

    They couldn't understand how Apple could do it - which led to the disbelief, the idea that the demo must have been faked. Honestly, it was a rickety demo, with the developers in the front row taking shots when it didn't crash–but it wasn't faked.

    They couldn't understand how AT&T would let them do a real browser. They'd tried, and AT&T had told them they couldn't ship a real browser, so they were in disbelief, "it'll collapse the network!" Which it did at some points.

    They couldn't believe Apple got a better deal, and that this would cause them to lose AT&T as a customer. 

    They thought it wasn't secure, it had a worse keyboard than theirs, and it had terrible battery life. And it did have worse battery life compared to flip phones of the time, which could be expected to last a week on standby, or a few days with little talk time, rather than the iPhone's single day. It turned out, users didn't mind charging the phone every day.

    I can't emphasize the disbelief enough: They publicly said that Apple's demo was rigged.

    Also: at the time, it was an AT&T exclusive. AT&T had a 45 page book explaining all the ways to use the iPhone, and had the carefully crafted answers to questions about picture messaging (no one really cared about copy and paste at the time, unless you were coming from Palm/Treo or Windows Mobile). Sprint stores actively campaigned against it. 

    Sprint employees were instructed to point out the price, the unfairness of AT&T having an exclusive contract, the fact that AT&T couldn’t perform repairs (that they had to be done directly through Apple), that AT&T’s insurance wouldn’t cover it, that it was untested, that there was no way the internet would work how they advertised, and that its battery wasn’t removable – and anything else they could think of. 

    Soliwatto_cobramacguianantksundarambb-15
  • Reply 7 of 33
    vmarksvmarks Posts: 762editor
    Soli said:
    BTW, I'm loving these articles about the last decade. I'd like to see more of these as Apple has has many, many milestones over the years. For example, next year on 23 April 2018 will be the 10th anniversary of Apple buying PA Semi. Remember when people said that was a wait of money and that Apple couldn't possibly make a decent chip? In 2010 Apple introduced the iPad with the A4 chip and we've seen nothing but just success from Apple in this area. So much success that Apple's power per watt and lithography is besting the expensive and heavily wasted features on Intel's offerings.

    This wasn't even the first time they were rumored to have been buying a semiconductor company. They were originally meant to be doing it when the iPod was king, before there was an iPhone. People at the time were worried Apple would make it impossible to produce an mp3 player without licensing chips from them. 
    Soliwatto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 33
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    Even professional techies were blindsided by the iPhone. Some of the opinion pieces and reviews are hilarious when read in today’s context. I remember the biggest boogeyman was the keyboard (much like the headphone jack is today). They laughed at the touch keyboard like they laugh today about the headphone jack. I keep this in mind today when I read some of the techie wannabe’s pronouncements about what Apple must do to stay relevant and survive.
    polymniawilliamlondonwatto_cobraStrangeDaysanton zuykovanantksundaram
  • Reply 9 of 33
    tmaytmay Posts: 6,340member
    Soli said:
    BTW, I'm loving these articles about the last decade. I'd like to see more of these as Apple has has many, many milestones over the years. For example, next year on 23 April 2018 will be the 10th anniversary of Apple buying PA Semi. Remember when people said that was a wait of money and that Apple couldn't possibly make a decent chip? In 2010 Apple introduced the iPad with the A4 chip and we've seen nothing but just success from Apple in this area. So much success that Apple's power per watt and lithography is besting the expensive and heavily wasted features on Intel's offerings.

    I'm not surprised other than the A10x nomencature. Will the A11 yet to come be an architectural advancement on the A10x to support AI and AR?

    We'll know soon enough.


    watto_cobra
  • Reply 10 of 33
    GeorgeBMacGeorgeBMac Posts: 11,421member
    To be honest, my experience was quite different:
    When the iPhone came out I had been using a Samsung smart phone for years.   Actually, it was two devices in one:  a phone and a Palm OS based PDA...  

    The major difference between it and the iPhone was the keyboard.  The physical keyboard was easier to use -- but then it restricted the screen size to less than half of what it could be -- so it was a mixed blessing.

    And, to be honest, the Palm OS PDA seemed to me to be more functional than anything on the iPhone:  As a tech manager it kept track of everything I needed it to keep track of and did it very well.  Then, later as I transitioned into healthcare, it stored medical reference books that I needed quick access to...

    But, as time went on the Palm OS went into decline while Apple continued to improve the iPhone.  And eventually I transitioned to iPhone...
  • Reply 11 of 33
    xbitxbit Posts: 390member
    vmarks said:
    Soli said:
    vmarks said:
    I find Mike Lazardis' comment very revealing. If you can't figure out how Steve "squeezed a Mac" into a phone when everything is right there in front of you, how do you expect to understand what it is capable of and where the future is headed? 
    They were convinced they'd be fine. They had all of US Congress on Blackberry, and a number of other government contracts besides. They believed it was a fad, because real keyboards made them what they were.
    I seem to recall that the co-CEOs of Blackberry nee Research in Motion also didn't believe that Steve Jobs' January 2007 demo was authentic because they couldn't believe that the OS could be that responsive to mobile HW.
    They were very vocal about their disbelief, and their confidence that they couldn't lose their lead.

    They weren't alone. Ed Colligan said, those computer guys aren't going to walk in here and be able to do mobile.
    Ballmer had a few good ones, on the price, and there's no chance that the iPhone is going to get significant market share, no chance.
    Their remarks sound like misplaced hubris now but what could they really say publicly? I would suspect that most were terrified of the iPhone when they first saw it. Nokia's death knell was when their CEO admitted that they couldn't compete in a leaked memo. Sales collapsed shortly afterwards. Even a CEO in trouble has to put a brave face on events.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 33
    anton zuykovanton zuykov Posts: 1,056member
    What potential? What new smartphones? It is quite clear that the reason now they look the way they are, is just a natural evolution of smartphones.
    /s

    watto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 33
    I love to listen to naysayers. They sit back with their arms folded and with a smug smile on their faces. They like to say things like, "It won't work, it can't be done, it's definitely going to fail, no one needs it, etc." Honestly, what makes people so arrogant when it comes to predicting the future? I look at new things and say, "Maybe it does have some appeal even if I don't see the possibilities." I simply don't make stupid comments about what can happen in the future because I've seen so many changes and odd customer habits. I wouldn't ever buy a fidget spinner but they sure do sell a lot of them. I don't understand the purpose of them but apparently, a lot of people do .

    These people who are always claiming Apple is going to fail is just the craziest thing I can imagine. I realize any company can fail and Apple is no exception but why always single out Apple. So many CEOs of other companies said Apple would fail but it was those CEO's companies that failed. There's no future guarantee about anything except most of us die sooner or later. When it comes to products, it's just hard to tell what consumers will like, so you just never know what product will succeed or fail. I personally think all flagship smartphones are amazing and terrific so none are that much worse or better than others to a great degree. They can all do some pretty amazing things.

    It's a great time we live in when it comes to tech. I think all smartphone companies have a good chance at having a future because consumers need smartphones. I don't laugh if a company wants to build a smartphone with a physical keyboard because that's their vision and some people may prefer it. Why everyone laughed at Apple for not including a physical keyboard on the iPhone simply didn't make any sense to me. A virtual keyboard wasn't perfect but it certainly was usable and allowed people to have a larger display. People actually said this was stupid but they were so wrong it's unbelievable when I look back on those statements. I think everything should be given some chance instead of simply blowing it off as a failure.
    edited June 2017
  • Reply 14 of 33
    To be honest, my experience was quite different:
    When the iPhone came out I had been using a Samsung smart phone for years.   Actually, it was two devices in one:  a phone and a Palm OS based PDA...  

    The major difference between it and the iPhone was the keyboard.  The physical keyboard was easier to use -- but then it restricted the screen size to less than half of what it could be -- so it was a mixed blessing.

    And, to be honest, the Palm OS PDA seemed to me to be more functional than anything on the iPhone:  As a tech manager it kept track of everything I needed it to keep track of and did it very well.  Then, later as I transitioned into healthcare, it stored medical reference books that I needed quick access to...

    But, as time went on the Palm OS went into decline while Apple continued to improve the iPhone.  And eventually I transitioned to iPhone...
    You're entitled to like what you like regardless of what other people think of you.  You used the Palm PDA for what you needed it for and when it no longer suited you, you changed products.  It's just good to keep an open mind.  So many people form an instant hate for products they have little experience with.  How can a person simply look at a product and say it's no good without even trying it?  It seems so many tech-heads form an opinion from things they really know nothing about and it's really not fair.  Apple seems like a target for people when it comes to forming instant negative opinions when history shows they're mostly wrong.  Always give new products a chance.  Try it and if you don't like it, that's fine.  I just don't like it when people say it's no good for everyone else.
  • Reply 15 of 33
    To be honest, my experience was quite different:
    When the iPhone came out I had been using a Samsung smart phone for years.   Actually, it was two devices in one:  a phone and a Palm OS based PDA...  

    The major difference between it and the iPhone was the keyboard.  The physical keyboard was easier to use -- but then it restricted the screen size to less than half of what it could be -- so it was a mixed blessing.

    And, to be honest, the Palm OS PDA seemed to me to be more functional than anything on the iPhone:  As a tech manager it kept track of everything I needed it to keep track of and did it very well.  Then, later as I transitioned into healthcare, it stored medical reference books that I needed quick access to...

    But, as time went on the Palm OS went into decline while Apple continued to improve the iPhone.  And eventually I transitioned to iPhone...
    You're entitled to like what you like regardless of what other people think of you.  You used the Palm PDA for what you needed it for and when it no longer suited you, you changed products.  It's just good to keep an open mind.  So many people form an instant hate for products they have little experience with.  How can a person simply look at a product and say it's no good without even trying it?  It seems so many tech-heads form an opinion from things they really know nothing about and it's really not fair.  Apple seems like a target for people when it comes to forming instant negative opinions when history shows they're mostly wrong.  Always give new products a chance.  Try it and if you don't like it, that's fine.  I just don't like it when people say it's no good for everyone else.
    Ah, for a moment I thought you are talking about people in this forum ridiculing Android smartphones, based on problems with 4 year old android phones without even trying them in 2016 or 2017!!! Ok, it is about tech media in your post. But isn't it true the other way round as well?
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 16 of 33
    lkrupp said:
    Even professional techies were blindsided by the iPhone. Some of the opinion pieces and reviews are hilarious when read in today’s context. I remember the biggest boogeyman was the keyboard (much like the headphone jack is today). They laughed at the touch keyboard like they laugh today about the headphone jack. I keep this in mind today when I read some of the techie wannabe’s pronouncements about what Apple must do to stay relevant and survive.
    I like to call them numbskulls and knuckleheads.  What gives them the ability to foresee the future.  They think they're smarter than everyone else and that their opinion represents the entire population.  I understand people using standard headphone jacks like them, but to say Apple is wrong for eliminating them is just absurd.  Half the things on devices usually disappear in a decade, especially computing devices.  After these people have seen things like floppy discs and DVD drives disappear and the death of the VCR, how can they say that standard headphone jacks must stay forever.  I'm sure that in a couple of years most smartphones will no longer have standard headphone jacks.  I grew up in the 1950's and I've seen enough changes to know nothing remains the same.  It's just stupid to fight those changes.  Accept them and move on with the rest of the world.  Why people hate on Apple for starting those changes, I'll never know.  Somebody has to start with change, so it might as well be Apple.
  • Reply 17 of 33
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,213member
    Soli said:
    BTW, I'm loving these articles about the last decade. I'd like to see more of these as Apple has has many, many milestones over the years. For example, next year on 23 April 2018 will be the 10th anniversary of Apple buying PA Semi. Remember when people said that was a wait of money and that Apple couldn't possibly make a decent chip? In 2010 Apple introduced the iPad with the A4 chip and we've seen nothing but just success from Apple in this area. So much success that Apple's power per watt and lithography is besting the expensive and heavily wasted features on Intel's offerings.

    Agreed, some great articles in the past couple of days. Love the history and the tone. Well done AI.
    edited June 2017
  • Reply 18 of 33
    macguimacgui Posts: 2,360member
    I love to listen to naysayers. They sit back with their arms folded and with a smug smile on their faces. They like to say things like, "It won't work, it can't be done, it's definitely going to fail, no one needs it, etc." Honestly, what makes people so arrogant when it comes to predicting the future? I look at new things and say, "Maybe it does have some appeal even if I don't see the possibilities." I simply don't make stupid comments about what can happen in the future because I've seen so many changes and odd customer habits. I wouldn't ever buy a fidget spinner but they sure do sell a lot of them. I don't understand the purpose of them but apparently, a lot of people do .

    These people who are always claiming Apple is going to fail is just the craziest thing I can imagine. I realize any company can fail and Apple is no exception but why always single out Apple. So many CEOs of other companies said Apple would fail but it was those CEO's companies that failed. There's no future guarantee about anything except most of us die sooner or later. When it comes to products, it's just hard to tell what consumers will like, so you just never know what product will succeed or fail. I personally think all flagship smartphones are amazing and terrific so none are that much worse or better than others to a great degree. They can all do some pretty amazing things.

    It's a great time we live in when it comes to tech. I think all smartphone companies have a good chance at having a future because consumers need smartphones. I don't laugh if a company wants to build a smartphone with a physical keyboard because that's their vision and some people may prefer it. Why everyone laughed at Apple for not including a physical keyboard on the iPhone simply didn't make any sense to me. A virtual keyboard wasn't perfect but it certainly was usable and allowed people to have a larger display. People actually said this was stupid but they were so wrong it's unbelievable when I look back on those statements. I think everything should be given some chance instead of simply blowing it off as a failure.
    Other than loving to listen to naysayers, I agree with everything in your post. Naysayers are tedious and exist everywhere, including forums all over the net. If it's not about their pet device(s) it's a FAIL. That's it. No objectivity, no wait and see. And they never learn because ultimately, facts are irrelevant. It's always about what isn't, never about what could be, regardless of platform.

    I had several different phones before the iPhone, and as the rumors grew, I was giddy with hope. Having no idea what to expect, I still new a phone from Apple would be my next. Whatever it was going to be, I believed it would be unique and do things no other phone could. And I was right.

    It was fascinating on many levels, but the thing that made the biggest, immediate impact to me was the UI, with its combination of software and hardware— specifically, the Home button. No more drilling down and backing out to navigate. A phone that was actually efficient to use! 

    The future suddenly became dim for my Palm T3 and the creation of the App Store was its death knell. I still have my day one iPhone. I remember how detractors pointed out its 'flaws' and chanting the 'evolutionary, not revolutionary' cliche. They took great pains to point out how almost every single tech feature, hardware or software, had existed previously on some other platform or phone. They completely missed or discounted that nobody has assembled so many of these features on one phone, and so seamlessly integrated three devices into one. They not only didn't see the revolution coming, they didn't know it was already there.

    Everybody has their favorite device, platform, or brand. That doesn't in itself doesn't make them a fanboi or hater. Those are choices they make for themselves. Life's too short for me to waste time arguing about what something isn't. I'd much rather look forward to seeing what could and will be.


    edited June 2017 gatorguy
  • Reply 19 of 33
    PekoePekoe Posts: 6member
    I was working at Palm when the iPhone was announced.  We knew that Apple was working on a smart phone, but had convinced ourselves that Apple would be years behind us.  IMHO Apple's biggest advance was reinventing the relationship with the carriers.  All other smart phones of the day were loaded with bloatware, lousy apps, and unwanted features that the carriers required.  The iPhone was not.  Apple was able to get the carriers to support visual voice-mail -- a great advance for the day.  Palm and other smart phone makers had trouble getting the carriers do anything for us.  Apple was able to build a universal brand.  Palm and other smart phone makers were at best co-branded with each of the major carriers.   As time went on Apple was able to provide timely software upgrades which requires major testing/approvals from the carriers.  Palm and other smart phone makers struggled to get this same level of carrier support.  Anyway - congrats to Apple on all of the advances of the iPhone.
  • Reply 20 of 33
    anantksundaramanantksundaram Posts: 20,404member
    To be honest, my experience was quite different:
    When the iPhone came out I had been using a Samsung smart phone for years.   Actually, it was two devices in one:  a phone and a Palm OS based PDA...  

    The major difference between it and the iPhone was the keyboard.  The physical keyboard was easier to use -- but then it restricted the screen size to less than half of what it could be -- so it was a mixed blessing.

    And, to be honest, the Palm OS PDA seemed to me to be more functional than anything on the iPhone:  As a tech manager it kept track of everything I needed it to keep track of and did it very well.  Then, later as I transitioned into healthcare, it stored medical reference books that I needed quick access to...

    But, as time went on the Palm OS went into decline while Apple continued to improve the iPhone.  And eventually I transitioned to iPhone...
    You're entitled to like what you like regardless of what other people think of you.  You used the Palm PDA for what you needed it for and when it no longer suited you, you changed products.  It's just good to keep an open mind.  So many people form an instant hate for products they have little experience with.  How can a person simply look at a product and say it's no good without even trying it?  It seems so many tech-heads form an opinion from things they really know nothing about and it's really not fair.  Apple seems like a target for people when it comes to forming instant negative opinions when history shows they're mostly wrong.  Always give new products a chance.  Try it and if you don't like it, that's fine.  I just don't like it when people say it's no good for everyone else.
    Ah, for a moment I thought you are talking about people in this forum ridiculing Android smartphones, based on problems with 4 year old android phones without even trying them in 2016 or 2017!!! Ok, it is about tech media in your post. But isn't it true the other way round as well?
    You're being too facile. I think you fail to appreciate that the disdain here for Android (and its hardware makers) runs much, much deeper than your presumed "problems with 4 year old phones."

    You might wish to brush up on some of the history, especially the role that Schmidt played (with his being on Apple's board, his subsequent firing), Andy Rubin, the Apple-Samsung legal saga, etc.
    Soli
Sign In or Register to comment.