Review: Logitech's Circle 2 Wired is the best camera with Apple's HomeKit - for now

Posted:
in iPhone edited January 2021
Logitech's Circle 2 has been available for a little while, but only recently did the company add HomeKit support to the Wired model -- making it just one of two security cameras in the entire smarthome market with that integration. The results are reasonably good, but some missing features prevent a whole-hearted recommendation.




Installing the Circle 2 can be dead simple or consume an entire afternoon, depending on your needs. By default the camera offers an adjustable base, which can be used either as a stand or a wall mount -- some supplies are included for the second option. It's best to install the camera (and its power supply) in a location that can't easily be reached by thieves.

Indoor installations are generally the easy ones, since sockets are plentiful and Wi-Fi should be strong. All you need to do is position the camera, plug it in, and follow some basic steps in the Logi Circle app for iPhones and iPads -- a HomeKit ID can be found underneath the camera's removable exterior. We were up and running within minutes once we established a good vantage point.

If you choose to install outdoors, the camera is already weatherproof, but in addition to mounting it you'll have to run cables and ensure a steady Wi-Fi signal. Expect to need things like a ladder, clips, a drill, a Wi-Fi extender, and/or Logitech's $29.99 Weatherproof Extension, which is essential for exposed power outlets. A $39.99 window mount may avoid the need for going outdoors, but reflections and messy glass could cause their own problems.

The camera offers automatic night vision up to 15 feet, resolutions up to 1080p, and a field of view up to 180 degrees. Those are fairly impressive specs for a consumer model, its FOV enabling a single camera to cover a huge area. You can scale this back to "Wide" or "Ultra-wide" if the edges contain too much dead space or objects liable to trigger motion detection.




We chose "Ultra-wide," and also decided to scale resolution down to 720p, since 1080p led to too much buffering even on our test home's Wi-Fi network. Indeed there were still occasional buffering problems afterward whether viewing on Wi-Fi or LTE, but performance was quick and reliable enough that we didn't want to sacrifice any more quality.

Make no mistake, the Circle 2 is entirely cloud-dependent. There's no SD card slot or external drive support, meaning that if the internet goes down, so does recording. You can download highlight clips and screenshots at any time, including a handy "Day Brief" timelapse, but Logitech only offers 24 hours of storage for free -- 14- and 31-day Circle Safe subscriptions start at $3.99 per month, per camera.




Only a Circle Safe Premium plan costing $9.99 per month or $99.99 per year (and once again, per camera) offers features like person detection, motion zones, and more specific alerts and filtering.

Logitech's paid plans seem a little stingy, especially since Netgear offers 7 days of free recording for up to 5 Arlo cameras. The Circle Free plan is still better than offerings from August and Nest, which force you to pay for much of anything beyond live streaming.

The Logi Circle app only sends movement notifications when you're away from home. If you have Premium's motion zones enabled, you can choose to limit alerts to specific areas -- in a backyard, for instance, you can draw a zone around your patio using a Web interface. Premium members can also dictate whether alerts are limited to humans.




All customers can optionally narrow alerts to high activity, as well as 1-, 15-, or 30-minute frequencies. A privacy mode can be used to completely halt recording and alerts, but must be triggered through the Circle app, which makes it a little cumbersome.




The most disappointing thing about the Circle 2 proved to be its two-way audio. While its microphone did a decent job picking up voices and ambient noise, its speaker proved to be too weak, making it hard for people to hear if there was any other significant sound source.

HomeKit

HomeKit support could potentially tip the scales for some shoppers, and it's not hard to see why. On the simplest level, it makes the camera easier to control. On an iPhone or iPad you can tell Siri to "show me the security camera," and it'll jump straight to a custom live feed where mic and sound functions still work. Within the iOS Home app, the Circle 2 gets a live thumbnail view on the dashboard.




Live feeds are even available on the Apple Watch, though only streaming from a paired iPhone -- no dice for owners of the LTE Series 3.

Where HomeKit really matters is in integration with third-party accessories, particularly under iOS 11. We for instance set up a camera to turn on Philips Hue lights whenever the Circle 2 detected motion, but only at night. There's no reason to limit things to security either -- in theory motion can trigger fans, shades, outlets, and more.




There are some barriers. The camera's settings can only be configured via Logi Circle, and using Home limits the number of simultaneous live streams to two. Likewise, you'll need an Apple TV or iPad as a hub if you want remote streaming and automation, despite the Logi Circle app having no such restrictions.

It's worth noting here that the camera also supports a handful of Amazon Alexa commands -- just none that are terribly useful unless you have an Echo Show.

Conclusions

If you want an iPhone- or iPad-connected security camera and you're going the HomeKit route, the Circle 2 is easily the best choice at the moment. The only other HomeKit-compatible camera is the D-Link Omna 180 Cam HD, which records solely to microSD and has other drawbacks as well.

The operative words here are "at the moment." The hardware itself is cost-competitive, but its (paid) subscription plans aren't, and it desperately needs a louder speaker. Some form of local storage option would be good for backup purposes.

If HomeKit isn't absolutely essential, it might be wiser to consider something like Netgear's Arlo Pro 2, which not only includes 7-day cloud storage but a siren, USB drive support, and a wireless mode. Apple doesn't allow HomeKit on fully wireless security cameras, which may be the only thing holding Netgear back.

Score: 4 out of 5

Where to buy

The Logitech Circle 2 Wired is available at Amazon for $179.99 with free shipping. Best Buy also has the Circle 2 for the same price, with free in-store pickup.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 14
     Well I would like to agree with your four out of five rating, as a customer owning three of these, and having returned a wire free unit because of its unreliability, I have to disagree with you. I have found the cameras to be highly unreliable, with dreadful Wi-Fi picking up capabilities, even one or 2 meters from my router, it only shows two bars of signal.  I have had to implement additional Wi-Fi routers in the house just to cover a standard size house with cameras attached to the outside walls. The cost of implementation is astonishing. I have found that the responsiveness of the camera and their online service is dreadful, and we as a collective of users, based on the forums, I’ve found a platter of issues from being unable to reset the camera, to just simply being frustrating to work with.

    The biggest problem, however, is the fact that they frequently go off-line without any hope of recovery without a power cycle. After several trips away from home, I have on several occasions had to make do with cameras being off-line permanently, thus negating their usefulness. This is not a security device, but more hobby for them at this point, until they update or improve their firmware.

    On paper, perfect. In reality, frustrating as hell. Just search the forums on the community site for other people who are facing similar frustrations.
    abedossmacguihabiusrussw
  • Reply 2 of 14
    oomuoomu Posts: 130member
    way too much expensive for something my computer could do without cloud, securely, in my house.
  • Reply 3 of 14
    "Apple doesn't allow HomeKit on wireless security cameras"

    A review of a camera that communicates wirelessly is an odd place for this 
    statement. Did you intend to say that Apple does not allow Homekit on battery powered security cameras? 
  • Reply 4 of 14
    StrangeDaysStrangeDays Posts: 12,875member
    oomu said:
    way too much expensive for something my computer could do without cloud, securely, in my house.
    There is a functional difference between localized and cloud based storage. A thief or fire shuts down local. 
    bshank
  • Reply 5 of 14
    oomu said:
    way too much expensive for something my computer could do without cloud, securely, in my house.
    There is a functional difference between localized and cloud based storage. A thief or fire shuts down local. 
    I don't know the value of using a camera for a fire since fire alarms are specially designed to detect them but for security against theft I would prefer the camera to send the data wirelessly to an inconspicuous storage device like a time capsule hidden away. In fact I would prefer if the camera was also inconspicuous.
  • Reply 6 of 14
    wyredwyred Posts: 10member
    We've had good luck with Y-cam devices. The wired outdoor version is very stable and the app + free 7 days storage work well. Wifi version is not quite as stable but this may be due to my wifi router. Having your cloud videos stored most likely in China is not ideal but for our purposes it's working. Homekit would be nice but not worth the risk with the product above.
  • Reply 7 of 14
    flydogflydog Posts: 1,123member
    lack of local storage + requires subscription = no sale
  • Reply 8 of 14
    flydogflydog Posts: 1,123member
    oomu said:
    way too much expensive for something my computer could do without cloud, securely, in my house.
    There is a functional difference between localized and cloud based storage. A thief or fire shuts down local. 
    Ah yes the hypothetical thief and fire. Yet security cameras with local storage have the mainstay since cameras have been around. There already far more valuable things in homes that can be stolen by a thief or destroyed in a fire. 
  • Reply 9 of 14
    bshankbshank Posts: 255member
    flydog said:
    oomu said:
    way too much expensive for something my computer could do without cloud, securely, in my house.
    There is a functional difference between localized and cloud based storage. A thief or fire shuts down local. 
    Ah yes the hypothetical thief and fire. Yet security cameras with local storage have the mainstay since cameras have been around. There already far more valuable things in homes that can be stolen by a thief or destroyed in a fire. 
    It’s not about the value of the camera, it’s that the thief can steal evidence of his crime when a camera only has local storage
    russw
  • Reply 10 of 14

    It's too bad nobody could design something that saves to local NAS, which is then automatically backed up somewhere else.  I completely get why companies want to implement the subscription model, but I don't want video of my house saved on servers about which I know nothing with regard to security.

  • Reply 11 of 14
    GG1GG1 Posts: 483member
    I'd like a multi-camera security system that has local and cloud storage with motion zones. I'm waiting for Homekit devices, but the Circle 2 isn't it. I expect local storage to be free, and cloud storage to be available with optional subscription, but motion zones should be baseline capability. Even better, Apple could provide Homekit cloud storage so I know my video is reasonably secure (and not stored in an unknown location).

    I get that wifi cameras are convenient, but a wired system is so much more secure. A simple wifi jammer will take out all your wifi cameras without any physical entry to your system.
  • Reply 12 of 14
    macguimacgui Posts: 2,357member
    bshank said:
    It’s not about the value of the camera, it’s that the thief can steal evidence of his crime when a camera only has local storage
    I know this to be happening more and more in my area as burglars become more tech savvy, which is an eventuality. I'm surprised it took this long for the forum to realize this.
  • Reply 13 of 14
    trying to delete
    edited October 2017
  • Reply 14 of 14
    If you have Premium's motion zones enabled, you can choose to limit alerts to specific areas -- in a backyard, for instance, you can draw a zone around your patio using a Web interface. Premium members can also dictate whether alerts are limited to humans.



    This is untrue.  I own two of these after returning a third.  Using two wired cameras for 2-3 months. One of my biggest gripes is that  Motion detection notifications cannot be limited to motion zone areas. Example, I want notifications only when someone is on my front steps, not every time a car drives by on the road. I would think that is the whole point?!!

    Some other complaints:
    1. Camera goes offline frequently requiring power cycle (~once every week)
    2. Mediocre wi-fi reception (however it doesn't seem to affect performance much)
    3. Cost of the premium service is per camera making upgrades very expensive. 

    Pros:
    1. The "clip" system is a winner. 
    2. The "Day Brief" is fun and works quite well.
    3. Night Vision very crisp and clear although fast moving objects tend to blur - probably a function of not enough infrared light.

    Final conclusion: Happy with the purchase but holding off on expanding the system until above issues are addressed. There have been numerous firmware updates however so at least it appears Logitech is listening and reacting. Time will tell.
Sign In or Register to comment.