Real-world LTE speed has doubled since iPhone 5s, is big reason to upgrade

Posted:
in iPhone edited February 2019
Owners of older iPhone models should upgrade to newer versions if they want to benefit from faster cellular speeds, research from OpenSignal advises, with the iPhone 5s seemingly only capable of half of the network performance of the iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max due to the use of older communications technologies.

The iPhone XR doesn't use the same LTE Category support as the iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max, making it slower on mobile networks
The iPhone XR doesn't use the same LTE Category support as the iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max, making it slower on mobile networks


The full report by OpenReach expands on data revealed yesterday that the iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max are nearly 26 percent faster than all other models released between 2015 and 2017. On closer inspection of the data, it seems the adoption of new LTE Category numbers over the years makes a big difference in the amount of data an iPhone can consume at a time.

OpenSignal uses data from a variety of iPhones tested across the United States over multiple carriers, between October 26 and January 24. While 3G data could have been analyzed, the report solely looks into the use of 4G signal.

According to a chart of models from the iPhone 5s to the current generation of models, there is seemingly a major jump in connection speeds from the use of Cat 3 in the iPhone 5s and Cat 4 in the iPhone 6, 6 Plus, and iPhone SE, to later releases. While those that had Cat 4 LTE reached download speeds of up to 12.8Mbps, the iPhone 6S and Plus' support of Category 6 brought speeds up to 15.6Mbps and 15.9Mbps respectively.

Opensignal download speeds


Speeds did not majorly change until the introduction of Cat 12 support in the iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, and iPhone X, with the technology retained for use in the iPhone XR. Both the iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max's speeds above 20Mbps are partly due to their support of Category 16 LTE communications.

According to OpenSignal, smartphones using older 4G standards, namely those with lower LTE Category numbers, are incapable of supporting advanced techniques used by carriers to boost bandwidth, such as carrier aggregation. In the case of the LTE Category 16 devices, their modems are designed to improve the efficiency of network performance, which helps both with increasing speed but also keeping the connection stable.

It is also noted that, while the physically larger models have more room for high-grade antennas to be used, the Plus models of each generation have comparable connectivity to their non-Plus counterparts.

Opensignal upload speeds


A similar grouping of speed increases is also seen when upload speeds are examined. Newer devices tend to offer greater upload speeds than older models, with the iPhone XS Max at 20.2Mbps almost doubling the iPhone 5s' 10.2Mbps.

"With both 4G download and upload experience we see a difference between the iPhone XR and the iPhone XS," notes OpenSignal. "This highlights how the choice of modem, chipset, and antenna design influence the mobile network experience that consumers receive."

It is probable that the next generation of iPhones won't see as much of a speed boost as observed with the iPhone XS and XS Max. Apple typically lags behind the curve in terms of adopting communications standards, and the first iPhones to use the upcoming 5G networks isn't expected until 2020 at the earliest.

Carriers in the US have started to roll out their 5G mobile networks, which are expected to provide a major jump in connection speeds. Again, while there are some areas where some people can legitimately use 5G signal, they are currently limited to specific situations, with general coverage of standards-based 5G signal unlikely to make an impact until the end of 2019 or even 2020.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 12
    I’m glad I don’t live in an area with such lousy data speeds, or are they testing on Sprint? LOL. It’s fairly common for my XS Max to hit over 100 Mbps on Verizon (Beyond Unlimited data plan) in different parts of my city.
  • Reply 2 of 12
    A 5S with a 4in screen vs any modern phone. I guess everyone has different use cases but are you really going to be stream 4K video on such a small screen? I'm guessing that there are ten things more important to 5S users than their mobile download speeds.
    schlackbonobobcurtis hannah
  • Reply 3 of 12
    Those are some pretty graphs...

    The reality is my iPhone 6s speeds fluctuates enormously, and it has nothing to do with my device.

    In the exact same location my 6s can get anywhere from 75Mbs to less than 10Mbs, so I know the device is “capable” of at least 75Mbs on the network.

    I used to get closer to the 75Mbs every time I ran the test, but then T-mobile announced their merger with Sprint.  The problem isn’t my phone, it’s the network, interference, congestion, etc.

    If I upgrade 6s to the latest phone, I’ll see incremental improvement but not enough to justify the cost.  If bandwidth was the concern, I’d see greater improvement (for the cash) switching Verizon.

    I’ll replace my 6s when 5G is rolled out in my area.  That’s when I’ll see significant improvement...
    curtis hannah
  • Reply 4 of 12
    mac_128mac_128 Posts: 3,454member
    I don’t necessarily see a compelling reason to upgrade between the 6s and XS, but, I’m a little surprised to see the SE isn’t much faster than the 5s. Perhaps I’m remembering incorrectly, but I thought the SE had mostly 6s internals for all but the front display components. Guess this was one of the areas they didn’t boost to 6s specs.
    DAalsethcurtis hannah
  • Reply 5 of 12
    DAalsethDAalseth Posts: 2,783member
    mac_128 said:
    I don’t necessarily see a compelling reason to upgrade between the 6s and XS, but, I’m a little surprised to see the SE isn’t much faster than the 5s. Perhaps I’m remembering incorrectly, but I thought the SE had mostly 6s internals for all but the front display components. Guess this was one of the areas they didn’t boost to 6s specs.
    I thought so too. I was surprised the SE was so far behind. We have an SE and a 6. I was thinking of keeping them for another couple of years but maybe it's time we start looking at upgrading.
  • Reply 6 of 12
    Folks should never expect good speeds from cellular networks. It’s total laziness not to get WiFi for the home internet. Plus WiFi is better for the phone battery.
  • Reply 7 of 12
    davgregdavgreg Posts: 1,037member
    I see the 5G E on my iPhone (AT&T) and Ookla Speedtest says 80.5 Mbps down 20.4 up. My Comcast Cable Internet according to my eero router is getting 141 Mbps down 12 up.

    Where I see a problem is in dense urban areas- I live in the burbs. In the city, there are a lot more phones drawing on every tower and the speeds are nowhere near that even when you are close and unimpeded.

    The real improvement in mobile internet has been away from the urban centers and Interstate corridors. I drive to a rural hospital on weekends and the quality of coverage is so much better than it used to be there is no scale I can think of to apply to it. There are 3 different routes I can take depending upon construction and weather. 2 of them have flawless connectivity and the 3rd is much better but still has a stretch of very marginal connectivity, but it is a very rural area in the middle of nowhere.
  • Reply 8 of 12
    My XS Max just tested at 37 download and 25 upload.

    However, I should clarify that I’m in our warehouse at work which gets poor reception. I have hit 100 several times in areas with better reception. No complaints here with my speeds and my apparently shitty Intel modem.
  • Reply 9 of 12
    sflocalsflocal Posts: 6,093member
    Folks should never expect good speeds from cellular networks. It’s total laziness not to get WiFi for the home internet. Plus WiFi is better for the phone battery.
    It doesn't have to do with laziness.  I know plenty of people who's home WiFi is actually slower than their phone antenna.  Other scenarios like connecting to WiFi at work is not feasible for many as well since WiFi (like at my company) runs through an overly-restrictive firewall that blocks just about anything so it's better to just disable WiFi and use my cell provider.  I'm not alone.  This is quite common.
  • Reply 10 of 12
    This isn't all taking everything into account, when the 5S came out it was lucky for any phone in the US to have 10 Mbps speeds, now you are considered to be in a bad signal area if you're having less than 20 Mbps, in most areas it averages 50 Mbps+. Sure an iPhone XS might have up to double that do to more bands supported, but odds are it won't.

    Faster cellular is not at all in my consideration to upgrade my 6S+, unless you consider it might discourage me knowing 5g networks are a year or so away and that is a reason to delay.
  • Reply 11 of 12
    mattinozmattinoz Posts: 2,315member
    Why does size effect speed?

    My 5s loads anything i'd want out and about faster enough when in a reasonable service area. I see no reason in these figures to update.
    ( I wouldn't class it as an upgrade given the compromises required)
  • Reply 12 of 12
    mac_128mac_128 Posts: 3,454member
    mattinoz said:
    Why does size effect speed?

    My 5s loads anything i'd want out and about faster enough when in a reasonable service area. I see no reason in these figures to update.
    ( I wouldn't class it as an upgrade given the compromises required)
    My SE likewise loads anything I want plenty fast. In a direct comparison to my 5s, I can say the SE appears to load noticibly faster. Now that I know they have about the same cellular network performance, the processor seems to make a significant difference, even in loading the data. So it’s an illusion... I’m sure I’d see a noticible difference in loading speed, but probably not that significant in real world situations.
Sign In or Register to comment.