California reintroduces 'Right to Repair' bill after previous effort failed
After a failed attempt in 2018, California lawmakers will again hear arguments for the institution of so-called "right to repair" legislation that would compel electronics makers to provide repair manuals, tools, parts and other related material to consumers and independent repair outlets.
California State Assembly member Susan Talamantes Eggman on Monday announced the introduction of Assembly Bill 1163, which will require manufacturers like Apple to "make service literature and equipment or parts available to product owners and to regulated, independent repair shops."
"For nearly 30 years California has required that manufacturers provide access to replacement parts and service materials for electronics and appliances to authorized repairers in the state. In that time, manufacturers have captured the market, controlling where and when we repair our property, and inflating the electronic waste stream," Eggman said. "The Right to Repair will provide consumers with the freedom to have their electronic products and appliances fixed by a repair shop or service provider of their choice, creating a competitive market that will be cheaper for consumers and reduce the number of devices thrown in the trash."
The bill, officially filed as legislation relating to electronic waste, is Eggman's second try at right to repair legislation. Her first attempt, 2018's Bill 2110, was introduced last March and subsequently died in assembly that November. Like the pending Bill 1163, last year's tendered legislation was crafted as a play to reduce e-waste.
Eggman's announcement includes a word-for-word reproduction of an explainer included in 2018's press release for the now-dead Bill 2110. In it the lawmaker argues that customers who are unable to pay for manufacturer repairs are forced to replace broken equipment like smartphones, TVs and home appliances.
Beyond financial benefits, Eggman also says that the repair and reuse of electronics is more efficient than purchasing a new device, noting that such measures can "stimulate local economies instead of unsustainable overseas factories."
Repair firm iFixit, a steadfast right to repair proponent, publicized Eggman's announcement in a press release sent out to media on Monday.
Apple with its strict in-house and authorized third party repair policies is a primary target of right to repair bills. The company is openly opposed to such legislation, saying access to repair material would expose industry secrets and create security and safety issues for customers. The right to repair movement has so far failed to gain traction in state governments, in part due to lobbyists contracted by Apple and other manufacturers.
Right to repair advocates, however, claim companies that oppose legislation like Bill 1163 do so merely for financial gain. The repair business is a lucrative one, and opening it up to independent firms would lower customer costs by introducing competition, some argue.
The right to repair movement got a shot in the arm earlier this year when Allstate purchased repair firm iCracked.
With its second attempt at right to repair, California joins a cadre of 19 other states with similar legislation on the table.
California State Assembly member Susan Talamantes Eggman on Monday announced the introduction of Assembly Bill 1163, which will require manufacturers like Apple to "make service literature and equipment or parts available to product owners and to regulated, independent repair shops."
"For nearly 30 years California has required that manufacturers provide access to replacement parts and service materials for electronics and appliances to authorized repairers in the state. In that time, manufacturers have captured the market, controlling where and when we repair our property, and inflating the electronic waste stream," Eggman said. "The Right to Repair will provide consumers with the freedom to have their electronic products and appliances fixed by a repair shop or service provider of their choice, creating a competitive market that will be cheaper for consumers and reduce the number of devices thrown in the trash."
The bill, officially filed as legislation relating to electronic waste, is Eggman's second try at right to repair legislation. Her first attempt, 2018's Bill 2110, was introduced last March and subsequently died in assembly that November. Like the pending Bill 1163, last year's tendered legislation was crafted as a play to reduce e-waste.
Eggman's announcement includes a word-for-word reproduction of an explainer included in 2018's press release for the now-dead Bill 2110. In it the lawmaker argues that customers who are unable to pay for manufacturer repairs are forced to replace broken equipment like smartphones, TVs and home appliances.
Beyond financial benefits, Eggman also says that the repair and reuse of electronics is more efficient than purchasing a new device, noting that such measures can "stimulate local economies instead of unsustainable overseas factories."
Repair firm iFixit, a steadfast right to repair proponent, publicized Eggman's announcement in a press release sent out to media on Monday.
Apple with its strict in-house and authorized third party repair policies is a primary target of right to repair bills. The company is openly opposed to such legislation, saying access to repair material would expose industry secrets and create security and safety issues for customers. The right to repair movement has so far failed to gain traction in state governments, in part due to lobbyists contracted by Apple and other manufacturers.
Right to repair advocates, however, claim companies that oppose legislation like Bill 1163 do so merely for financial gain. The repair business is a lucrative one, and opening it up to independent firms would lower customer costs by introducing competition, some argue.
The right to repair movement got a shot in the arm earlier this year when Allstate purchased repair firm iCracked.
With its second attempt at right to repair, California joins a cadre of 19 other states with similar legislation on the table.
Comments
"The company is openly opposed to such legislation, saying access to repair material would expose industry secrets and create security and safety issues for customers.”
There goes privacy and security when that part you bought is later found to be reporting your every move and word to god knows who or where. Oh, you say, legit repair shops will only install Apple OEM parts in your $1K phone. Think again.
I have always opted to repair at Apple’s authorised agent or now Apple’s own store due to earlier horrible experience with 3rd parties. Guess the legislation folks don’t understand the full implications of it!!!
Right to Repair is most commonly associated with automotive repair. Today there are numerous aftermarket manufacturers that make all sorts of commonly replaced parts on vehicles along with countless independent repair shops. These shops can buy parts from dealers (OEM parts) if they wish or choose aftermarket.
That said, not all parts are available from third parties. Especially certain electronic modules or components related to security. Can you imagine being able to buy an instrument cluster and enter your own mileage when you install it? Or allowing independent shops the ability to code their own remote keys?
This is the angle Apple will use to limit right to repair. They can’t be expected to give independent shops access to equipment and parts related to security. I can see Apple providing batteries or screens (common repairs), but that’s it.
If Apple changes their repair policies, will Apple sell more idevices? The answer is no. Apple maintains high resale values because of the quality of repairs/referbs. Apple is going to fight “right to repair” forever...
These initiatives aren't about consumers having the right to repair their electronics. They are about forcing others to facilitate consumers' ability to repair such electronics. People almost always have the right to repair their stuff. What they may sometimes not have is the ability to do so. Compelling particular others to facilitate their ability to do so is, I think, wrong. Those others may have good reasons to choose not to facilitate that ability.
This is another case of governments ostensibly trying to address a supposed problem which, to the extent it really is a problem, the market is quite capable of dealing with. If it's an important enough issue, and people not being able to repair their electronics is a big enough problem, then the market can fix that problem. Apple, e.g., should get to decide whether it is going to make it easy for others to fix Apple products. People should decide, in light of Apple's decisions in that regard as well as based on other factors, whether they will buy Apple products. If repairability (by someone other than Apple) is an important enough consideration - a feature which is in sufficient demand - then the lack thereof will affect Apple's sales enough to cause it to change its policies. Other manufacturers who want to capitalize on that demand can run ads pointing out Apple's policies regarding repairability.
We don't need, and shouldn't embrace, more regulation of such things. We should advocate for not only our only freedoms but those of others.
My big fear is if it mandates that all products be repairABLE. Frankly in order to do what they are designed to do, some products cannot be. I work for a manufacturing company. One of the things we make is a high pressure camera. In order to work, the whole camera is filled with Lucite. We assemble and test the camera and once it passes, put it in a mold and fill it to the brim with liquid Lucite. Once it is hard there is no way it could be repaired. If the law mandated that our products be repairABLE we just would not sell to California.
Scare mongering is a pretty low form of defending a company. "if you don't buy Ford parts you will die". Give me a break. I have been repairing my own stuff for decades and never once have I bought a stealership product. I can get better quality for cheaper by using a myriad of other places to purchase parts. I haven't died yet, so quit the "whoa is you" garbage.